Skip to main content
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2020 Aug 4;8:682. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00682

Cerium Oxide-Decorated γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles: Design, Synthesis and in vivo Effects on Parameters of Oxidative Stress

Maksym Moskvin 1, Irena Marková 2, Hana Malínská 2, Denisa Miklánková 2, Martina Hüttl 2, Olena Oliyarnyk 2, Ognen Pop-Georgievski 1, Alexander Zhigunov 1, Eduard Petrovský 3, Daniel Horák 1,*
PMCID: PMC7417791  PMID: 32850680

Abstract

Magnetic γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles were obtained by basic coprecipitation/oxidation of iron chlorides with hydrogen peroxide, followed by precipitation of Ce(NO3)3 with ammonia. The appearance of CeOx on the magnetic particle surface was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and elemental analysis; a magnetometer was used to measure the magnetic properties of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx. The relatively high saturation magnetization of the particles (41.1 A·m2/kg) enabled magnetic separation. The surface of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles was functionalized with PEG-neridronate of two different molecular weights to ensure colloidal stability and biocompatibility. The ability of the particles to affect oxidative stress in hereditary hypertriglyceridemic (HHTg) rats was tested by biological assay of the liver, kidney cortex, and brain tissues. An improvement was observed in both enzymatic [superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx)] and non-enzymatic (reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione) levels of antioxidant defense and lipid peroxidation parameters [4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA)]. The results corresponded with chemical determination of antioxidant activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, proving that in the animal model γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles effectively scavenged radicals due to the presence of cerium oxide, in turn decreasing oxidative stress. These particles may therefore have the potential to reduce disorders associated with oxidative stress and inflammation.

Keywords: maghemite, cerium oxide, nanoparticles, oxidative stress, antioxidant

Introduction

On a cellular level, many types of inflammation are associated with the excessive formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide/hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Schieber and Chandel, 2014). Their ability to be scavenged is important in combating serious oxidative stress-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis, liver steatosis, diabetes mellitus, cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and aging. All these disorders are associated with severe damage to lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids (Poprac et al., 2017; Rehman and Akash, 2017). Due to ability of cerium oxide (CeOx) nanoparticles to mimic antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Korsvik et al., 2007; Celardo et al., 2011), catalase (CAT) (Pirmohamed et al., 2010), and peroxidase (Jiao et al., 2012), they have recently received considerable attention as a potentially useful antioxidant agent in mitigating these diseases. These nanoparticles are adept at scavenging almost all types of reactive species, including hydroxyl and nitroxyl radicals. The impressive radical scavenging activity of CeOx, which can take the form of CeO2 or Ce2O3, is attributed to mutations in the oxidation state between Ce4+ and Ce3+ ions (Asati et al., 2009; Xu and Qu, 2014). In order to enhance scavenging activity, the surface area of CeOx must be increased, achieved by decreasing their overall size to a nanometer scale.

In addition to their usefulness in biomedicine, drug delivery, and analysis, CeOx nanoparticles are also utilized in numerous engineering applications, such as solid-oxide fuel and solar cells (Stambouli and Traversa, 2002; Corma et al., 2004), corrosion protection (Ivanov et al., 2009), and catalysis (Walkey et al., 2015). The many approaches to preparing CeOx nanoparticles largely depend on variations in morphology, size, and the tendency to aggregate. These include ball milling, thermal decomposition, precipitation, spray pyrolysis, hydro-/solvothermal or sol-gel methods, surfactant-assisted techniques, and green synthesis using natural stabilizers (Xu and Qu, 2014). Precursors of CeOx synthesis include ammonium cerium nitrate, cerium sulfate, nitrate, and chloride. However, a key role in the fabrication of CeOx nanoparticles is played by surface engineering, which ensures colloidal stability in physiological media, biocompatibility, and/or functionalization with reactive groups employed for further conjugation of biomolecules, targeting peptides, and/or drugs. Among the conventionally used coatings are dextran (Karakoti et al., 2007; Weaver and Stabler, 2015), polyethylenimin (Lee et al., 2013), poly(ethylene glycol) (Karakoti et al., 2009), poly(acrylic acid) (Wu et al., 2018), cyclodextrin (Xu et al., 2013), and glucose (Li et al., 2013).

Another class of inorganic particles attracting growing attention in biomedicine is the iron oxides (magnetite Fe3O4 and maghemite γ-Fe2O3). These materials are superparamagnetic, magnetizing in the presence of an external magnetic field; however, they exhibit no residual magnetization in the absence of a magnetic field (Li et al., 2017). These properties enable the targeting tissues required by drug delivery systems and/or monitoring of iron oxide-labeled cells using non-invasive in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Moreover, magnetic nanoparticles can control the movement and transportation of biomolecules and/or generate heat in an external magnetic field to kill tumor cells (Jordan et al., 1993). A major advantage of Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 is their biocompatibility, with ferumoxytol (Feraheme) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease suffering from iron deficiency (Toth et al., 2017).

The aim of this report was to merge both the magnetic and antioxidant properties of the maghemite core and cerium oxide shell into a new delivery system that would be colloidally stable and magnetically manipulable. Antioxidant properties were verified based on chemical and biological in vivo tests of using a rat model of metabolic syndrome and prediabetes—the hereditary hypertriglyceridaemic rat (Malinska et al., 2019). Effect of cerium oxide-decorated γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles on oxidative stress and antioxidant defense parameters has been evaluated.

Experimental

Materials

FeCl2 · 4H2O, FeCl3 · 6H2O, Ce(NO3)3 · 6H2O, trisodium citrate dihydrate, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). NH4OH (25 wt.%), HCl (35 wt.%), H2O2 (30 wt.%), ethanol (96 %), propan-2-ol, and all other chemicals were purchased from LachNer (Neratovice, Czechia). Poly(ethylene glycol)-neridronate (PEG-Ner) was synthesized using PEG at a molecular weight of 2,000 or 5,000 Da as described previously (Kostiv et al., 2017).

Preparation of Cerium Oxide-Decorated Maghemite Nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3/CeOx)

γ-Fe2O3 cores were obtained by modifying a previously published procedure (Moskvin and Horák, 2016). Briefly, an aqueous FeCl3 and FeCl2 solution (500 ml; FeCl3/FeCl2 = 2/1 mol/mol) was precipitated with NH4OH (20 ml; pH 11) at 70°C by stirring (700 rpm); the resulting magnetite (Fe3O4) was oxidized by the addition of H2O2 (5 ml) and 35 % HCl (~12 ml) at 90°C. The final γ-Fe2O3 particles were washed with water five times using a magnetic separation and sonication (Hielscher UP-400St; Teltow, Germany; 20 W and 70 % amplitude) for 10 min and stabilized with trisodium citrate (60 mg per 300 mg of γ-Fe2O3). The γ-Fe2O3 surface was then modified by dispersion precipitation of cerium(III) nitrate (300 mg; γ-Fe2O3/Ce(NO3)3 = 1/1 w/w) with NH4OH (1 ml; pH 11) in a mixture of water/propan-2-ol = 1/1 v/v (25 ml) at 60°C for 3 h. Subsequently, the colloid was thoroughly washed with water 10 times (20 ml each) under sonication and magnetic separation and stabilized by the addition of aqueous trisodium citrate as described above; the final concentration was 4 mg of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx per ml (pH ~8).

Pure CeOx particles used as a reference material in DPPH assay were prepared as described above, but in the absence of γ-Fe2O3.

PEGylation of Cerium Oxide-Decorated Maghemite Nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG)

Aqueous γ-Fe2O3/CeOx (100 mg) dispersion (10 ml) was added to a solution of poly(ethylene glycol)-neridronate (40 mg) in water (15 ml). The reaction proceeded at room temperature (RT) for 1 h with sonication for 5 min. The resulting γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles were washed with water (100 ml).

Particle Characterization

γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles were visualized using the Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (TEM; FEI; Brno, Czechia). Number-average diameter (Dn = ΣDi/N, where Di is the diameter of the i-th particle and N is the total number of particles), weight-average diameter (Dw = ΣDi4Di3) and dispersity (Ð = Dw/Dn) were calculated from at least 300 individual particles on the micrographs using Atlas software (Tescan Digital Microscopy Imaging; Brno, Czechia). Surface ζ-potential, hydrodynamic diameter Dh, and polydispersity PI were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a ZEN3600 Nano-ZS ZetaSizer (Malvern Instruments; Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of dry γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles were measured in reflection mode using the Explorer high-resolution diffractometer (GNR Analytical Instruments; Agrate Conturbia, Italy) equipped with the Mythen 1K one-dimensional silicon strip detector (Dectris; Baden, Switzerland). Radiation of MoKα (λ = 0.7107 Å) monochromatized with Zr foil (β-filter) was used for diffraction in the range of 2θ = 2–40° with step 0.1° and exposure time 10 s. FTIR spectra were recorded in KBr pellet on a Bruker IFS 55 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) with a DTGS detector under resolution of 4 cm−1 and 32 scans. Cerium, iron, carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen content was determined using the Perkin-Elmer 3110 atomic absorption spectrometer after mineralizing particles with HCl (1:1) at 80°C and the Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN elemental analyzer. Magnetic properties of the particles were measured using the EV9 vibrating sample magnetometer (DSM Magnetics ADE; Lowell, MA, USA) at RT; magnetization was corrected for paramagnetic contribution in fields >400 kA/m.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS was performed using a K-Alpha+ XPS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Loughborough, UK) operating at a base pressure of 1.0 × 10−7 Pa. Data were acquired and processed using Thermo Scientific Avantage software. γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles were uniformly deposited on clean silicon substrates and analyzed using Al Kα X-ray microfocused monochromated radiation (400 μm spot size) with a pass energy of 200 and 50 eV for survey and high-energy resolution core-level spectra, respectively. The X-ray angle of incidence was 30°, with the emission angle normal to the surface. The K-Alpha dual-charge compensation system was employed during analysis, using electrons and low-energy argon ions to prevent any localized charge build-up. The acquisition times were kept <1 min to avoid the reduction of cerium oxide after the exposure to XPS radiation under high vacuum (Zhang et al., 2004). The high-resolution spectra were fitted using Voigt profiles and referenced to the C 1 s peak attributed to C-C and C-H at 285.0 eV binding energy, which was controlled using the standard photoelectron peak positions for poly(ethylene terephthalate), Cu, Ag, and Au. Atomic concentrations of phosphorous, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, iron, and cerium were determined from the P 2p, C 1s, N 1s, O 1s, Fe 2p, and Ce 3d photoelectron peak areas after Shirley inelastic background subtraction. The amount of cerium in oxidation states Ce3+ and Ce4+ was approximated by comparing the measured spectra with those of Ce2O3 and CeO2 taken from Avantage database.

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant activity of the particles was measured colorimetrically by 2,2-diphenyl-l-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. Briefly, 0.1 mM ethanolic DPPH solution (0.6 ml) was added in a 2 ml Eppendorf tube to a mixture of ethanol (1.2 ml) and aqueous particle dispersion (0.2 ml; 4.4 mg of γ-Fe2O3/ml) with shaking for 1 min using a Vortex shaker (1,000 rpm), leaving the reaction to continue in darkness for 30 min. The above mixture was used as a control or blank solution in the absence of the particles or DPPH, respectively. Absorbance of the solution was measured by the Specord 250 Plus UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena, Germany) against ethanol at 517 nm. Antioxidant activity (AA) was calculated using Equation (1):

AA=Ac-Ap+AbAc·100 (1)

where Ac, Ap, and Ab is the absorption of control, particle dispersion, and blank, respectively.

Administration of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx Nanoparticles Using an Experimental Animal Model

To investigate the in vivo effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles, a non-obese rat model of metabolic syndrome and prediabetes was used. The hereditary hypertriglyceridemic (HHTg) strain of rat exhibits dyslipidemia, tissue resistances to insulin action, fatty liver, mild hypertension, and low-grade chronic inflammation in the absence of obesity. Animals were fed a standard diet and given free access to food and water. Five-month-old male rats were randomly divided into five experimental groups of eight animals; untreated rats, treated with γ-Fe2O3 (control), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles. Nanoparticle dispersions (4 mg/ml) were administrated i.v. to the vena caudalis at a dose of 0.5 ml, untreated rats were given i.v. 0.5 ml saline instead of nanoparticle dispersion. Three days after nanoparticle application, the animals were sacrificed in a postprandial state. The collected tissue samples (liver, kidney cortex and brain) were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C before analysis.

All experiments were performed in agreement with the Animal Protection Law of the Czech Republic (311/1997) in compliance with European Community Council recommendations (86-609/ECC) for the use of laboratory animals and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague.

Basal Metabolic Analysis

Serum levels of triglycerides, glucose, and total cholesterol were measured using commercially available kits (Erba Lachema; Brno, Czechia). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) enzyme activity was determined spectrophotometrically using routine clinical biochemistry methods and Roche Diagnostics kits (Mannheim, Germany).

Oxidative Stress Parameters

Levels of reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) forms of glutathione were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescent detection using a HPLC diagnostic kit (Chromsystems; Gräfelfing, Germany).

The antioxidant enzyme activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was measured using commercially available kits (Sigma-Aldrich and Cayman Chemicals; Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Malondialdehyde (MDA), a parameter of lipid peroxidation, was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection; 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), a sensitive product of lipid peroxidation, was detected by rat ELISA assay (MyBiosource; San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Fisher's post-hoc test using Statistica 12 software. Group comparisons were made against the control group of γ-Fe2O3-administered animals. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles

Starting iron oxide particles were prepared using a one-pot procedure consisting of two steps: (i) aqueous precipitation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) chlorides with ammonia, followed by (ii) oxidation with H2O2 and electrostatic stabilization achieved by the addition of trisodium citrate. The morphology of particles was almost spherical, with a mean diameter Dn = 15 nm and a dispersity Ð = 1.28 according to TEM, indicating moderately broad particle size distribution (Figure 1A; Table 1). These results were in agreement with DLS analysis, which documented polydispersity PI = 0.21, hydrodynamic size Dh = 68 nm, and ζ-potential = −43 mV due to citrate stabilization. Dh proved larger than Dn because the former is a z-average diameter affected by the presence of larger particles to a much greater extent than the latter diameter of dry particles determined by TEM. Moreover, the particles had a tendency to slight aggregation in water.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

TEM micrographs of (A) γ-Fe2O3, (B) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and (C) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles.

Table 1.

Characterization of nanoparticles.

Particles Dn (nm) Ð Dh (nm) PI ζ-potential (mV) AA (%)
γ-Fe2O3 15 1.28 68 0.21 −43 13
γ-Fe2O3/CeOx 16 (6)a 1.33 85 0.27 −45 78
γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 16 (6)a 1.39 63 0.20 −29 89
γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 17 (6)a 1.37 71 0.22 −15 85
a

CeOx nanoparticles; Dn, number-average particle diameter (TEM); Ð, dispersity (TEM); Dh, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS); PI, polydispersity (DLS); AA, antioxidant activity.

To determine whether magnetite (Fe3O4) or maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) was obtained during coprecipitation, an XRD diffractogram of the synthesized iron oxide particles was compared with the reference diffraction lines of cubic γ-Fe2O3 according to the Crystallography Open Database (COD)1; COD ID 96-900-6317 (Figure 2; reference vertical diffraction lines were marked in black). The most intense peaks for Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 coincided; the differences in peak positions were minor, but clearly visible, suggesting that the particles contained γ-Fe2O3. The less intense γ-Fe2O3 peak, at 2θ = 22.49°, was observed as a small bump in the diffractogram. The particle sizes L were estimated using the Scherrer (Equation 2):

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Diffraction pattern of γ-Fe2O3 (black), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx (red), and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles (blue) compared to that of γ-Fe2O3 and CeO2 from the Crystallography Open Database (vertical black and green lines, respectively).

L=Kλβ· cos Θ (2)

where K is the shape factor (usually 0.9) and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of reflection. For this purpose, the most intense peak at 2θ = 16.24° was chosen, possessing FWHM = 0.4734°. Assuming that the particle is fully crystalline, average size of 17.4 nm was obtained, which agrees well with TEM results.

Cerium Oxide-Decorated γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3/CeOx)

A TEM micrograph of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles could not distinguish CeOx from γ-Fe2O3 due to their similar electron densities (Figure 1B); however, rather small CeOx nanoparticles (~6 nm) were clearly visible in the micrograph in addition to the pure γ-Fe2O3 particles (Figure 1A). Neither the dispersity (Ð = 1.33) nor morphology of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles (Figure 1B) substantially differed from those of starting γ-Fe2O3. This was in agreement with results obtained on magnetic cerium oxide nanoconjugates prepared by glutaraldehyde-crosslinked polyethyleneimine-coated mixture of magnetic and cerium oxide nanoparticles (Turin-Moleavin et al., 2019). Compared to the γ-Fe2O3 particles, the hydrodynamic size of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles in water increased (Dh = 85 nm), probably due to the presence of CeOx and the citrate layer; ζ-potential did not substantially change from that of γ-Fe2O3.

From the XRD spectrum of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles, it was evident that CeO2 was present in the composite in its crystalline form (Figure 2). The conclusion was made by comparing the diffractogram with COD ID 96-434-3162. Therefore, the diffraction curve, corresponding to the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx composite (Figure 2, red line), showed the superposition of neat crystalline phases of γ-Fe2O3 and CeO2.

FTIR spectra of the γ-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles were recorded to probe their surface structure (Figure 3); the spectra did not substantially differ, with the exception of high intensities of γ-Fe2O3 bands in the region of 400–800 cm−1, corresponding to the vibrations of atoms in the crystalline lattice of iron oxide. A broad band of OH- stretching vibrations was situated at ~3,400 cm−1 and ascribed to hydroxyl groups on the particle surface and partially to water adsorbed by hygroscopic KBr used as a binder for the sample preparation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

FTIR spectra of γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles.

The covalent structure of the nanoparticles was further investigated after each modification step by XPS (Figure 4; Table 2). The pure γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles exhibited a characteristic Fe 2p spectrum previously reported for maghemite (Zasonska et al., 2016; Shatan et al., 2019). Successful deposition of cerium oxide on γ-Fe2O3 was verified in the high-resolution Ce 3d spectra of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles based on the appearance of characteristic Ce 3d5/2-Ce 3d3/2 spin-orbital multiplet splitting. Ce content reached ~26 wt.%, while iron content in the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles dropped to 38.7 ± 1.7 wt.% from 64.5 ± 2.2 wt.% in γ-Fe2O3. The Ce4+/Ce3+ ratio was determined to be 7.8 (Table 2), showing that cerium was predominantly in the form of CeO2 (~23.1 wt.%). Small peaks were found in the C 1s spectra of pure γ-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles, originating from organic molecules adsorbed on the nanoparticle surface during its exposure to air.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

High-resolution Fe 2p, Ce 3d, C 1s, P 2p, and N 1s XPS spectra of (a) γ-Fe2O3, (b) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and (c) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles. Spectra and their resulting fitted envelopes are presented with full and magenta lines, respectively. Individual contributions of the fitted curve are presented with dashed lines.

Table 2.

Surface composition of γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles determined by XPS analysis.

Electronic state of element γ-Fe2O3(wt.%) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx(wt.%) γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2, 000(wt.%)
P 2p a 1.8 ± 0.1
C 1s 7.5 ± 1.9 8.8 ± 1.2 34.0 ± 0.5 26.1 ± 0.1b
N 1s 0.9 ± 0.1
O 1s 28.0 ± 0.4 26.2 ± 0.8 36.2 ± 0.2
Fe 2p 64.5 ± 2.2 38.7 ± 1.4 13.9 ± 0.2
Ce 3d 26.3 ± 0.7 13.2 ± 0.4
Ce4+/Ce3+ 7.8 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.2
a

Below the detection limit of XPS measurement;

b

content of PEG according to C-O-C bond.

Magnetic measurements of γ-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles revealed saturation magnetization values of Ms = 53.3 and 41.1 A·m2/kg, respectively (Figure 5). This means that ~23 wt.% of CeOx was present in the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles, as calculated from the dependence of Ms on γ-Fe2O3 content. Remanent magnetization and coercivity of γ-Fe2O3 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx were very low (Mrs = 0.4 and 0.2 A·m2/kg and Hc = 2.8 and 1.1 Oe, respectively), as determined using interpolation between the neighboring data points on the hysteresis loop. This shows the absence of a domain structure due to the collective behavior and high concentration of superparamagnetic particles. As a result, the particles remained dispersible in water in the absence of an external magnetic field and easily magnetized and manipulated in its presence, thus enabling magnetic separation of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Magnetization hysteresis loop of γ-Fe2O3 (blue) and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles (red) at room temperature; magnified loop is inserted. H, magnetic field; M, magnetization.

γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG Nanoparticles

To provide efficient steric stabilization even in buffered media at a high ionic strength and to enhance biocompatibility of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles, their surfaces were modified with PEG-neridronate (PEG-Ner) at two different molecular weights: Mw = 2,000 and 5,000 Da (Figure 6). PEG-Ner was obtained from sodium neridronate and O-[(N-succinimidyl)succinylaminoethyl]-O'-methylpoly(ethylene glycol) as previously described (Kostiv et al., 2017). As PEG <5 kDa is typically used for PEGylation of particles in in vivo studies (Zalipsky, 1995), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles were investigated by TEM, XPS, FTIR, and elemental analysis. According to TEM, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles resembled to γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, with PEG coating invisible due to its low electron density (Figure 1C). The γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles had a number-average diameter Dn = 15 and 6 nm for maghemite and cerium oxide particles, respectively; dispersity Ð = 1.39 was higher than that of pure γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles due to the presence of tiny CeOx particles; the hydrodynamic diameter of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles reached Dh = 63 and 71 nm, respectively, with PI = 0.2 (Table 1). The PEG-modified particles were smaller in size, as they have a reduced tendency to aggregate due to improved steric stabilization. Moreover, the effect of the counter-ion layer on citrate-stabilized γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles may have caused them to increase in size. Absolute value of ζ-potential of PEGylated γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles decreased due to the presence of electroneutral PEG shell; nevertheless, it was still negative (Table 1).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Synthesis of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles using PEG-neridronate.

X-ray diffraction spectrum of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles was presented in Figure 2 as a blue curve. Peak positions and relative intensities of γ-Fe2O3 and CeO2 phases were the same as for the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, confirming no changes in crystalline structure of the two components. Despite the fact that the content of PEG2,000 was relatively high (>26 wt.% according to XPS), no crystalline peak corresponding to PEG was observed. Moreover, there was a wide peak with a mean value of 2θ = 12.3°, which could be ascribed to the mean distance between PEG chains.

FTIR spectrum of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles had strong valence vibration band of amide N-H bonds at 1,550 cm−1, corresponding to PEG-neridronate linker (Figure 3). Bands at 2,870, 1,467, and 1,342 cm−1 were ascribed to PEG aliphatic chain vibrations of CH3 and scissor and wagging vibrations of CH2, respectively. Vibrations of C-O-C groups of PEG were observed at 1,240, 1,097, and 960 cm−1. Band at 1,643 and 1,278 cm−1 was attributed to vibrations of amide carbonyls and P=O bonds originating from phosphonic acid residues of neridronate. This confirmed successful anchoring of PEG-Ner to the particle surface.

XPS spectroscopy confirmed the successful chelation of PEG-Ner to the cerium oxide shell. The strong binding of PEG2,000-Ner to γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles was clearly evident from high-resolution P 2p, C 1s, and N 1s spectra of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles (Figure 4). The presence of neridronate was detected based on its characteristic P 2p and N 1s signals from the bisphosphonate and amide groups at 132.1 and 399.8 eV, respectively. The experimentally found bisphosphonate/amide ratio (0.92 mol/mol) corresponded with the theoretical ratio in PEG-Ner that equaled one. PEG binding to the cerium oxide shell induced a significant increase of C 1s content to 34.0 ± 0.5 wt.% (Table 2). In addition, the C 1s spectrum of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles was dominated by a characteristic PEG C–O–C signal at 286.6 eV (Pop-Georgievski et al., 2018); PEG reached a quantity of 26.1 ± 0.1 wt.%. Coating the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx with PEG induced a drop in iron and cerium content to 13.9 ± 0.2 and 13.2 ± 0.4 wt.%, respectively, further confirming the successful surface modification of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles with PEG. Modification of the particles with PEG did not significantly reduce the Ce4+/Ce3+ ratio amounting to 7.7 (Table 2). This result confirmed that the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx possessed high CeO2 content (~11.7 wt.%) even after the reaction with bisphosphonate groups of PEG-Ner.

Atomic absorption spectroscopy and elemental analysis were used as further methods to characterize the elemental composition of particles (Table 3). Experimentally found Fe, Ce, C, and N content was close to theoretical values. The percentage of analyzed Ce (20.1 wt.%) almost corresponded to Ce content (19 wt.%) based on magnetization measurement and assuming CeO2 to be a shell. The Fe content found in γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles (54.2 wt.%) was slightly higher than theoretical value (50 wt.%), probably due to the moderate removal of cerium oxide during particle purification. Carbon analysis revealed 12.7 wt.% of C, indicating that the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particles contained 25.4 wt.% of PEG, which means that 63 wt.% of PEG loaded in the reaction mixture was actually attached to the particle surface. Nitrogen content originating from the neridronate groups anchored to the iron oxide surface amounted to 0.5 wt.% (Table 3). The discrepancies between elemental analysis and XPS can be attributed to the latter technique only accounting for the particle surface layer and not the particle bulk.

Table 3.

Elemental composition of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles.

Element particles Fe (wt.%)a Ce (wt.%)a C (wt.%) H (wt.%) N (wt.%)
Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp.
Fe2O3/CeOx 50 54.2 23.3 20.1
γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 35.6 39.5 16.6 14.3 14.4 12.7 2.4 3.2 0.3 0.5
a

Based on atomic absorption spectroscopy; Th., theoretical content, Exp., experimentally found content.

ROS Scavenging by CeOx and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG Nanoparticles

The antioxidant activity (AA) of CeOx particles determined by DPPH assay reached 96%, while that of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles was 78%, which was a much higher percentage than that of pure γ-Fe2O3 at only 13% (Table 1). Both γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles exhibited similar antioxidant activity, reaching 89 and 85%, respectively. The increase in AA, compared to that of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles, can be ascribed to the enhanced surface area of the PEG-modified particles available for scavenging as a result of reduced particle aggregation. A small decrease of antioxidant activity of PEGylated γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles compared to that of pure CeOx can be ascribed to the presence of iron oxide with reduced AA.

In vivo Effect of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG Nanoparticles on Oxidative Stress in HHTg Rats

Through biological experiments, effect of γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles on oxidative stress and the antioxidant defense in HHTg rats was investigated. Preliminarily, various exposure times were tested (1, 3, and 5 days), with the greatest nanoparticle effect found after 3 days of exposure. Nanoparticle administration did not alter rat body weight, glucose serum levels, triglycerides, total cholesterol, or hepatic enzyme activity (Table 4), suggesting that the particles not only avoided damaging the liver but also exhibited good biocompatibility.

Table 4.

Basal metabolic parameters of HHTg animals untreated and treated with γ-Fe2O3/CeOx-based nanoparticles.

Untreated γ-Fe2O3 γ-Fe2O3/CeOx γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2, 000 γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5, 000 p
Body weight (g) 405 ± 13 386 ± 46 387 ± 25 417 ± 36 408 ± 18 n.s.
Triacylglycerols (mmol/l) 3.22 ± 0.33 3.47 ± 0.20 3.45 ± 0.46 3.84 ± 0.34 2.96 ± 0.62 n.s.
Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.88 ± 0.10 2.04 ± 0.35 1.86 ± 0.19 1.98 ± 0.10 1.85 ± 0.12 n.s.
Non-fasting glucose (mmol/l) 8.71 ± 0.22 8.05 ± 1.60 8.13 ± 0.38 8.70 ± 0.44 7.96 ± 0.60 n.s.
ALT (μkat/l) 1.16 ± 0.12 1.07 ± 0.08 1.09 ± 0.14 1.04 ± 0.06 1.19 ± 0.50 n.s.
AST (μkat/l) 2.75 ± 0.09 2.41 ± 0.11 2.70 ± 0.48 2.25 ± 0.18 2.76 ± 0.07 n.s.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; p, statistical significance; n.s., not significant.

Considering oxidative stress status, effect of each nanoparticle type was investigated on liver, kidney cortex, and brain tissues. The activity of antioxidant enzyme SOD increased significantly in the liver after γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 administration as well as in the brain after γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and in the kidney after γ-Fe2O3/CeOx exposure, compared to the animal control group treated with γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (Figure 7A). CAT activity increased after the administration of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 in the brain only (Figure 7B). After exposure of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000, the activity of glutathione-dependent enzyme GPx increased in the liver and brain as well as in the liver after γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles administration (Figure 7C). In the brain, elevated levels of the reduced form (GSH) of glutathione and decreased levels of the oxidized form (GSSG) after γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx treatment improved oxidative status. The injection of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 in HHTg rats also markedly decreased the oxidized form of glutathione in the liver and kidney cortex (Figures 8A,B). After γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 particle administration, reduced levels of MDA were observed in the liver (Figure 9A). The concentration of another product of lipid peroxidation, 4-HNE, did not change after nanoparticle applications in the case of all tissues examined, indicating no oxidative damage to lipids (Figure 9B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effect of γ-Fe2O3 (yellow), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx (red), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 (blue), and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles (green) on activity of (A) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) catalase (CAT), and (C) glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in the tissues of HHTg rats; rats untreated with nanoparticles are in gray. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effect of γ-Fe2O3 (yellow), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx (red), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 (blue), and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles (green) on level of (A) reduced (GSH) and (B) oxidized forms of glutathione (GSSG) in the tissues of HHTg rats; rats untreated with nanoparticles are in gray. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Effect of γ-Fe2O3 (yellow), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx (red), γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 (blue), and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 nanoparticles (green) on concentrations of (A) malondialdehyde (MDA) and (B) 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) markers of lipid peroxidation in the tissues of HHTg rats; rats untreated with nanoparticles are in gray. *p < 0.05.

Discussion

In order to obtain magnetic particles possessing antioxidant properties, γ-Fe2O3 particles were used as seeds for CeOx growth (Figure 10). Dispersion precipitation of Ce(NO3)3 with ammonia (pH 11) resulted in the formation of Ce(OH)3 nuclei, which were attached to the γ-Fe2O3 surface by hydrogen bonds. This was followed by the conversion of Ce(OH)3 to Ce2O3 using a dehydration reaction under heating. The subsequent growth of cerium oxides was stabilized by sodium citrate, resulting in a ceria shell formation around the iron oxide core. XRD confirmed the presence of γ-Fe2O3 and CeO2 crystalline forms in the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles. Further coating by PEG2,000 did not affect the crystalline structure of the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles or induced crystallization of PEG. Based on a comparison of the high-resolution Ce 3d spectra (Figure 4) with data from the literature (Beche et al., 2008), we conclude that cerium in γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles coexisted in both Ce3+ and Ce4+ oxidation states, the latter being the most predominant. The saturation magnetization of starting γ-Fe2O3 was relatively comparable to previous reports (Lai et al., 2003; Zasonska et al., 2019), albeit lower than that of bulk maghemite. Because these particles are small in size, they are less magnetic than the same material in bulk, since they contain a higher fraction of metal ions on the particle surface that fail to contribute to net magnetization (Kucheryavy et al., 2013).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Synthesis of sodium citrate-stabilized γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles by dispersion precipitation of Ce(NO3)3 with NH4OH.

In order to stabilize the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles in a culture medium and render them biocompatible, they must be coated with a polymer that is both amphiphilic and hydrophilic. PEG-Ner is an eminently suitable candidate, boasting extremely high affinity of bisphosphonate groups to metal cations (in our case Ce3+) deposited on the γ-Fe2O3 surface. This post-modification of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx nanoparticles differs from one-pot synthesis of dextran-coated nanoceria, which involves the alkaline-based precipitation of cerium oxide from a solution containing cerium salt and dextran (Perez et al., 2008). One of the benefits of CeOx is its ability to catalytically scavenge ROS, including H2O2, hydroxyl, and superoxide radicals due to the high number of surface cerium atoms capable of alternating between Ce3+ and Ce4+ (Figure 11). The further ability of CeOx to self-regenerate its surface makes the γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles an ideal candidate for in vivo ROS scavenging.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Schematic view of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radical scavenging due to a Ce3+/Ce4+ redox shift on γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles.

In this report, antioxidant activity of γ-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles was documented by DPPH assay, a convenient and accurate method for chemically determining radical scavenging ability. γ-Fe2O3 itself exhibited relatively low AA due to the redox properties of Fe3+ ions and the large specific surface area of the particles. In contrast, the ability of cerium oxides attached to the γ-Fe2O3 surface to capture radicals was much higher than that of γ-Fe2O3. γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles showed significantly higher antioxidant activity (AA ~90 %), compared to activity previously reported (AA ~45%) for poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)-stabilized Fe3O4/CeO2 core-shell nanoparticles determined by H2O2/horse radish peroxidase assay (Wu et al., 2018). Increased AA in γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG particles can be induced by differences in the chemical structure and steric orientation of the above polymer coatings, thus restricting the accessibility of DPPH radicals to cerium ions in PAA-coated Fe3O4/CeO2 nanoparticles. This effect may also be partially due to differences in the assays employed.

To determine the antioxidant effect of cerium oxide-decorated magnetic particles, a strain of HHTg rats was deemed the most suitable experimental model given its tendency to exhibit increased oxidative stress in tissues (Malinska et al., 2019). We examined the tissues of the liver, kidney cortex, and brain, where metabolic disorders and changes are associated with metabolic syndrome and diabetes, after administering each nanoparticle type. Based on in vivo tests, Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 were found to exhibit a superior antioxidant defense to γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000 and γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles, activating most antioxidant enzymes and reducing the concentration of MDA formed by lipid peroxidation in the liver. Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 exhibited a positive effect on the brain by increasing GSH levels while simultaneously decreasing GSSG concentrations, thus improving oxidative status. Last but not least, Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG particles also demonstrated their capacity to circulate freely within the rat blood stream and thus reach and positively affect target tissues, an especially important asset in preventing the development of diabetic complications.

Conclusion

We developed a combination of antioxidant CeOx nanoparticles and superparamagnetic γ-Fe2O3 particles by dual coprecipitation and oxidation of Fe chlorides and Ce nitrate in alkaline media. The colloidal stability and biocompatibility of the resulting γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles was clearly boosted by PEGylation. PEG-neridronate proved an excellent stabilizing agent for preventing particle aggregation. γ-Fe2O3/CeOx particles reached the target tissues and ameliorated oxidative stress in tissues. The PEG coating did not affect the autocatalytic properties of nanoceria, given that hydrogen peroxide and peroxyl radicals were able to diffuse through the hydrophilic PEG shell and oxidize Ce3+ to Ce4+. Representing another significant advantage, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG nanoparticles can be prospectively monitored by MRI, facilitating the tracking of cerium oxide delivery to the diseased site and the evaluation of ceria biodistribution. Combining the antioxidant defense properties of cerium oxide with a magnetic carrier thus provides great benefits for magnetic targeting. Compared to the administration of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG5,000, γ-Fe2O3/CeOx, and control γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, the effect of γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles on parameters of oxidative stress in the brain and liver of HHTg rats was superior. The γ-Fe2O3/CeOx@PEG2,000 nanoparticles proved to positively influence oxidative stress in experimental animals, thus providing protection against oxidative damage. As such, the particles offer great potential for reducing complications associated with various diseases accompanied by increased oxidative stress such as cardiovascular disorders, diabetes mellitus, liver steatosis, and inflammatory conditions.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.

Author Contributions

MM synthesized the particles. IM, HM, DM, MH, and OO performed ROS scavenging and in vivo studies of the particles. OP-G, AZ, and EP performed XPS, XRD, and magnetic measurements, respectively. DH supervised the work and together with IM wrote the publication. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. Main financial support of the Czech Science Foundation (20-02177J) was gratefully acknowledged; OP-G also acknowledges CSF (20-08679S) for the support. We acknowledge support of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic under the Conceptual Development of Research Organizations program (Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine – IKEM, IN 00023001). This work also was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Program II (Project BIOCEV-FAR LQ1604). The Cedars-Sinai Medical Center's International Research and Innovation in Medicine Program is also gratefully acknowledged, as well as the RECOOP HST Association. Opportunity for MM's doctoral studies at the Charles University was acknowledged.

References

  1. Asati A., Santra S., Kaittanis C., Nath S., Perez J. M. (2009). Oxidase-like activity of polymer-coated cerium oxide nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2308–2312. 10.1002/anie.200805279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beche E., Charvin P., Perarnau D., Abanades S., Flamant G. (2008). Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (CexTiyOz). Surf. Interface Anal. 40, 264–267. 10.1002/sia.2686 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Celardo I., Pedersen J. Z., Traversa E., Ghibelli L. (2011). Pharmacological potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 3, 1411–1420. 10.1039/c0nr00875c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corma A., Atienzar P., Garcia H., Chane-Ching J.-Y. (2004). Hierarchically mesostructured doped CeO2 with potential for solar-cell use. Nat. Mater. 3, 394–397. 10.1038/nmat1129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ivanov V. K., Shcherbakov A., Usatenko A. (2009). Structure-sensitive properties and biomedical applications of nanodispersed cerium dioxide. Russ. Chem. Rev. 78, 855–871. 10.1070/RC2009v078n09ABEH004058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiao X., Song H. J., Zhao H. H., Bai W., Zhang L. C., Lv Y. (2012). Well-redispersed ceria nanoparticles: promising peroxidase mimetics for H2O2 and glucose detection. Anal. Methods 4, 3261–3267. 10.1039/c2ay25511a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jordan A., Wust P., Fähling H., John W., Hinz A., Felix R. (1993). Inductive heating of ferrimagnetic particles and magnetic fluids - physical evaluation of their potential for hyperthermia. Int. J. Hyperthermia 9, 51–68. 10.3109/02656739309061478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karakoti A. S., Kuchibhatla S. V. N. T., Babu K. S., Seal S. (2007). Direct synthesis of nanoceria in aqueous polyhydroxyl solutions. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 17232-17240. 10.1021/jp076164k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karakoti A. S., Singh S., Kumar A., Malinska M., Kuchibhatla S. V. N. T., Wozniak K., et al. (2009). PEGylated nanoceria as radical scavenger with tunable redox chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 14144–14145. 10.1021/ja9051087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Korsvik C., Patil S., Seal S., Self W. T. (2007). Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 1056–1058. 10.1039/b615134e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kostiv U., Lobaz V., Kučka J., Švec P., Sedláček O., Hrubý M., et al. (2017). A simple neridronate-based surface coating strategy for upconversion nanoparticles: highly colloidally stable 125I-radiolabeled NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+@PEG nanoparticles for multimodal in vivo tissue imaging. Nanoscale 9, 16680–16688. 10.1039/C7NR05456D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kucheryavy P., He J., John V. T., Maharjan P., Spinu L., Goloverda G. Z., et al. (2013). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with variable size and an iron oxidation state as prospective imaging agents. Langmuir 29, 710–716. 10.1021/la3037007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lai J., Shafi K. V. P. M., Loos K., Ulman A., Lee Y., Vogt T., et al. (2003). Doping γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with Mn(III) suppresses the transition to the α-Fe2O3 structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11470–11471. 10.1021/ja035409d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee S. S., Song W., Cho M., Puppala H. L., Nguyen P., Zhu H., et al. (2013). Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating. ACS Nano 7, 9693–9703. 10.1021/nn4026806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li M., Shi P., Xu C., Ren J. S., Qu X. G. (2013). Cerium oxide caged metal chelator: anti-aggregation and anti-oxidation integrated H2O2-responsive controlled drug release for potential Alzheimer's disease treatment. Chem. Sci. 4, 2536–2542. 10.1039/c3sc50697e [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Q., Kartikowati C. W., Horie S., Ogi T., Iwaki T., Okuyama K. (2017). Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 7, 9894. 10.1038/s41598-017-09897-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malinska H., Hüttl M., Oliyarnyk O., Markova I., Poruba M., Racova Z., et al. (2019). Beneficial effect of troxerutin on metabolic disorders in a non-obese model of metabolic syndrome. PLoS ONE 14, e0220377. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moskvin M., Horák D. (2016). Carbohydrate-modified magnetic nanoparticles for radical scavenging. Physiological Res. 65 (Suppl. 2), S243–S252. 10.33549/physiolres.933426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perez J. M., Asati A., Nath S., Kaittanis C. (2008). Synthesis of biocompatible dextran-coated nanoceria with pH-dependent antioxidant properties. Small 4, 552–556. 10.1002/smll.200700824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pirmohamed T., Dowding J. M., Singh S., Wasserman B., Heckert E., Karakoti A. S., et al. (2010). Nanoceria exhibit redox state-dependent catalase mimetic activity. Chem. Commun. 46, 2736–2738. 10.1039/b922024k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pop-Georgievski O., Zimmermann R., Kotelnikov I., Proks V., Romeis D., Kučka J., et al. (2018). Impact of bioactive peptide motifs on molecular structure, charging, and nonfouling properties of poly(ethylene oxide) brushes. Langmuir 34, 6010–6020. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Poprac C., Jomova K., Simunkova M., Kollar V., Rhodes C. J., Valko M. (2017). Targeting free radicals in oxidative stress-related human diseases. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 38, 592–607. 10.1016/j.tips.2017.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rehman K., Akash M. S. H. (2017). Mechanism of generation of oxidative stress and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus: how are they interlinked? J. Cell Biochem. 118, 3577–3585. 10.1002/jcb.26097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schieber M., Chandel N. S. (2014). ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 24, R453–R462. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shatan A. B., Venclíková K., Zasonska B. A., Patsula V., Pop-Georgievski O., Petrovský E., et al. (2019). Antibacterial silver-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles: design, synthesis and bactericidal effect. Pharm. Res. 36, 147–159. 10.1007/s11095-019-2680-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stambouli A. B., Traversa E. (2002). Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 6, 433–455. 10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00014-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Toth G. B., Varallyay C. G., Horvath A., Bashir M. R., Choyke P. L., Daldrup-Link H. E., et al. (2017). Current and potential imaging applications of Ferumoxytol for magnetic resonance imaging HHS public access. Kidney Int. 92, 47–66. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Turin-Moleavin I.-A., Fifere A., Lungoc A.-L., Rosca I., Coroaba A., Peptanariu D., et al. (2019). In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of the new magnetic-cerium oxide nanoconjugates. Nanomaterials 9, 1565. 10.3390/nano9111565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Walkey C., Das S., Seal S., Erlichman J., Heckman K., Ghibelli L., et al. (2015). Catalytic properties and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano, 2, 33–53. 10.1039/C4EN00138A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weaver J. D., Stabler C. L. (2015). Antioxidant cerium oxide nanoparticle hydrogels for cellular encapsulation. Acta Biomater. 16, 136–144. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu Y., Yang Y., Zhao W., Xu Z. P., Little P. J., Whittaker A. K., et al. (2018). Novel iron oxide–cerium oxide core–shell nanoparticles as a potential theranostic material for ROS related inflammatory diseases. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 4937–4951. 10.1039/C8TB00022K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu C., Lin Y., Wang J., Wu L., Wei W., Ren J., et al. (2013). Nanoceria-triggered synergetic drug release based on CeO2-capped mesoporous silica host-guest interactions and switchable enzymatic activity and cellular effects of CeO2. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2, 1591–1599. 10.1002/adhm.201200464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu C., Qu X. (2014). Cerium oxide nanoparticle: a remarkably versatile rare earth nanomaterial for biological applications. NPG Asia Mater. 6, e90 10.1038/am.2013.88 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zalipsky S. (1995). Chemistry of polyethylene glycol conjugates with biologically active molecules. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 16, 157–182. 10.1016/0169-409X(95)00023-Z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zasonska B. A., Líšková A., Tulinská J., Pop-Georgievski O., Ciampor F., Vávra I., et al. (2016). Functionalized porous silica&maghemite core-shell nanoparticles for applications in medicine: design, synthesis and immunotoxicity. Croat. Med. J. 57, 165–178. 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zasonska B. A., Pustovyy V. I., Babinskiy A. V., Palyvoda O. M., Chekhun V. F., Todor I., et al. (2019). Combined antitumor effect of surface-modified superparamagnetic maghemite nanoparticles and a vitamin E derivative on experimental Walker-256 mammary gland carcinosarcoma. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 471, 381–387. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang F., Wang P., Koberstein J., Khalid S., Chan S. W. (2004). Cerium oxidation state in ceria nanoparticles studied with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and absorption near edge spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 563, 74–82. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.05.138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES