Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;25(8):661–668. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0780

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis with MLR‐LDH combination

Variables Training cohort Validation cohort Pooled cohort
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Age, ≥70 vs.70 1.79 (1.11–2.86) .016 1.38 (0.85–2.24) .188 1.63 (1.18–2.25) .003
Sidedness, left vs. right 0.62 (0.36–1.06) .089 0.81 (0.51–1.29 .387 0.75 (0.54–1.04) .018
Surgery of primary tumor, yes vs. no 0.40 (0.24–0.68) .001 0.97 (0.61–1.53) .904 0.67 (0.49–0.94) .089
Pattern of metastasis
Lung vs. liver 0.97 (0.47–1.96) .933 1.42 (0.75–2.69) .273 1.17 (0.76–1.82) .466
Nodes vs. liver 1.29 (0.68–2.46) .456 1.07 (0.52–2.23) .839 1.29 (0.81–2.05) .281
Peritoneum vs. liver 1.39 (0.78–2.44) .254 3.06 (1.68–5.57) <.001 1.97 (1.33–2.93) .001
BRAF, mutated vs. WT 2.31 (1.08–4.91) .029 1.37 (0.64–2.93) .412 1.79 (1.06–3.02) .028
MLR‐LDH combination
MLR or LDH high vs. low 2.74 (1.62–4.66) <.001 1.86 (1.00–3.47) .051 1.98 (1.38–2.86) <.001
MLR and LDH high vs. low 3.73 (1.94–7.18) <.001 4.46 (2.09–9.52) <.001 3.42 (2.16–5.41) <.001
NLR, continuous variable 1.00 (0.99–1.01) .321 0.97 (0.88–1.06) .527 1.00 (0.99–1.02) .081

Bold values are statistically significant. Italicized text are values of reference.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MLR, monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; WT, wild type.