Table 3.
Nested logistic regression model of determinants of HB vaccinate intention among migrant workers in Tianjin
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | |
| Gender | |||||||||
| Male | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Female | 0.84 | 0.53–1.34 | 0.463 | 0.80 | 0.49–1.28 | 0.345 | 0.71 | 0.43–1.18 | 0.191 |
| Age | |||||||||
| 16–35 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| 35–45 | 0.44 | 0.21–0.90 | 0.025 | 0.38 | 0.18–0.80 | 0.011 | 0.28 | 0.12–0.63 | 0.002 |
| 45–65 | 0.36 | 0.18–0.72 | 0.004 | 0.33 | 0.16–0.68 | 0.003 | 0.35 | 0.16–0.77 | 0.009 |
| Education level | |||||||||
| low | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Medium | 0.73 | 0.34–1.59 | 0.428 | 0.65 | 0.27–1.56 | 0.330 | 0.56 | 0.22–1.42 | 0.225 |
| High | 1.21 | 0.66–2.23 | 0.536 | 1.26 | 0.65–2.43 | 0.492 | 1.23 | 0.62–2.48 | 0.554 |
| Marital status | 1.81 | 0.93–3.54 | 0.080 | 2.29 | 1.10–4.80 | 0.028 | 3.17 | 1.44–6.98 | 0.004 |
| Self-rated health | |||||||||
| Poor | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Medium | 1.01 | 0.57–1.79 | 0.962 | 1.20 | 0.66–2.19 | 0.553 | 1.78 | 0.91–3.46 | 0.090 |
| Good | 1.88 | 1.00–3.54 | 0.052 | 2.17 | 1.10–4.25 | 0.025 | 3.37 | 1.61–7.09 | 0.001 |
| Income group | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Medium | 0.63 | 0.35–1.14 | 0.129 | 0.60 | 0.33–1.12 | 0.107 | 0.65 | 0.34–1.24 | 0.191 |
| High | 1.21 | 0.70–2.10 | 0.497 | 1.41 | 0.80–2.48 | 0.236 | 1.26 | 0.68–2.34 | 0.466 |
| Migrant location | |||||||||
| Tianjin migrant | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| Non-tianjin migrant | 2.55 | 1.15–5.65 | 0.021 | 3.31 | 1.37–7.99 | 0.008 | |||
| Migrant accompanied | |||||||||
| Yes | 1.37 | 0.79–2.38 | 0.264 | 1.27 | 0.71–2.28 | 0.428 | |||
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| Industry | |||||||||
| Manufacturing | 0.61 | 0.32–1.17 | 0.137 | 0.68 | 0.34–1.38 | 0.287 | |||
| Retail | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| Service | 1.11 | 0.56–2.19 | 0.760 | 1.26 | 0.62–2.58 | 0.521 | |||
| Severity | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | ||||||||
| High | 2.15 | 1.25–3.71 | 0.006 | ||||||
| Vulnerability | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | ||||||||
| High | 1.07 | 0.64–1.78 | 0.809 | ||||||
| Response efficacy | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | ||||||||
| High | 0.86 | 0.50–1.46 | 0.565 | ||||||
| Self-efficacy | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | ||||||||
| High | 2.75 | 1.62–4.66 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Response costs | |||||||||
| Low | 1.0 | ||||||||
| High | 0.50 | 0.29–0.83 | 0.008 | ||||||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.050 | 0.074 | 0.146 | ||||||
| P | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.000 | ||||||
| -2LL | 438.56 | 427.48 | 394.21 | ||||||
Odds ratios 95% CI and p value are shown