Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr 16;154(1):72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.011

Table 1.

Patient characteristics in model development and validation cohort

Characteristic Mayo validation cohort (N=276) Published model development cohort* (N=350)
Age (years), median (range) 64 (21–91) 61 (34–86)
Primary site of disease, N (%)
  Ovary 186 (67.4) 264 (75.4)
  Peritoneal 72 (26.1) 44 (12.6)
  Fallopian tube 18 (6.5) 42 (12.0)
FIGO stage, N (%)
  IIIA/B 0 8 (2.3)
  IIIC 210 (76.1) 248 (70.9)
  IV 66 (23.9) 94 (26.9)
FIGO grade, N (%)
  1 or 2 13 (4.7) 19 (5.4)
  3 259 (93.8) 328 (93.7)
  Unknown 4 (1.4) 3 (0.9)
Histology, N (%)
  Endometrioid/clear cell 17 (6.1) 2 (0.6)
  Serous 236 (85.5) 314 (89.7)
  Mixed/Other 23 ( (8.3) 34 (9.7)
Preoperative CA-125 (U/mL), median (range) 729 (10–45400) 860 (9–38100)
ASA score, N (%)
  1 3 (1.1) 10 (2.9)
  2 139 (50.4) 158 (45.1)
  3 133 (48.2) 179 (51.1)
  4 1 (0.4) 3 (0.9)
Residual disease (RD), N (%)
  RD0, no visible disease 136 (49.3) 117 (33.4)
  RD1, 0.1–1.0 cm 114 (41.3) 144 (41.1)
  RD >1 cm 26 (9.4) 89 (25.4)

Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

*

Data from Suidan 2014 publication