Table 4.
Total predictive value score | Total patients | Optimal | Suboptimal | Observed suboptimal rate in the Mayo validation cohort (95% CI)* | Predicted suboptimal rate in the published model development cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N | N | |||
0 | 17/276 (6.2%) | 16 | 1 | 5.9% (0.2–28.7%) | 5% |
1–2 | 74/276 (26.8%) | 69 | 5 | 6.8% (2.2–15.1%) | 10% |
3–4 | 63/276 (22.8%) | 62 | 1 | 1.6% (0.04–8.5%) | 17% |
5–6 | 55/276 (19.9%) | 49 | 6 | 10.9% (4.1–22.3%) | 34% |
7–8 | 38/276 (13.8%) | 30 | 8 | 21.1% (9.6–37.3%) | 52% |
≥9 | 29/276 (10.5%) | 24 | 5 | 17.2% (5.9–35.8%) | 74% |
Exact 95% confidence intervals for a binominal proportion.