Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0237217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237217

Table 2. The distribution of catastrophic health expenditure over time.

Panel A IES 1995 IES 2000 IES 2005 IES 2010
Catastrophic ≥ 5% 4.7212 (4.475, 4.967) 4.8898 (4.608, 5.172) 11.8211 (11.384,12.258) 9.4446 (9.083, 9.806)
Catastrophic ≥ 10% 1.4361 (1.298, 1.574) 1.4477 (1.292, 1.604) 3.5206 (3.271, 3.770) 3.1664 (2.950, 3.383)
Catastrophic ≥ 15% 0.7191 (0.621, 0.817) 0.7553 (0.642, 0.869) 1.5903 (1.421, 1.759) 1.2592 (1.121, 1.397)
Catastrophic ≥ 25% 0.1603 (0.114, 0.207) 0.2653 (0.198, 0.333) 0.3879 (0.304, 0.472) 0.3676 (0.293, 0.442)
Catastrophic ≥ 40% 0.0357 (0.014, 0.058) 0.0801 (0.043, 0.117) 0.0942 (0.053, 0.136) 0.0688 (0.036, 0.101)
Panel B IES 1995 IES 2000 IES 2005 IES 2010
Catastrophic ≥ 5% 10.6837 (10.326,11.042) 10.5543 (10.153,10.956) 25.0609 (24.475,25.647) 22.2307 (21.716,22.745)
Catastrophic ≥ 10% 4.2454 (4.012, 4.479) 4.3678 (4.101, 4.635) 11.6129 (11.179,12.046) 9.9740 (9.603,10.345)
Catastrophic ≥ 15% 2.1786 (2.009, 2.348) 2.4961 (2.292, 2.700) 6.4753 (6.142, 6.808) 5.4897 (5.208, 5.771)
Catastrophic ≥ 25% 0.8406 (0.735, 0.946) 1.0898 (0.954, 1.226) 2.7329 (2.512, 2.953) 2.1735 (1.993, 2.354)
Catastrophic ≥ 40% 0.2678 (0.208, 0.328) 0.4698 (0.380, 0.559) 1.0431 (0.906, 1.181) 0.9082 (0.791, 1.026)
Panel C IES 1995 IES 2000 IES 2005 IES 2010
Catastrophic ≥ 5% 17.3380 (16.899,17.777) 17.8189 (17.319,18.319) 34.0974 (33.456,34.739) 30.3796 (29.811,30.948)
Catastrophic ≥ 10% 8.9570 (8.626, 9.288) 8.9496 (8.576, 9.323) 19.0413 (18.510,19.572) 16.0269 (15.573,16.480)
Catastrophic ≥ 15% 5.3708 (5.109, 5.632) 5.2992 (5.006, 5.592) 11.8450 (11.408,12.282) 9.7365 (9.370,10.103)
Catastrophic ≥ 25% 2.3120 (2.138, 2.486) 2.5093 (2.305, 2.714) 5.6856 (5.372, 5.999) 4.7162 (4.454, 4.978)
Catastrophic ≥ 40% 0.9745 (0.861, 1.088) 1.1303 (0.992, 1.269) 2.4770 (2.267, 2.687) 1.9868 (1.814, 2.159)

The table reports, for each survey year, the percentage of the the population facing catastrophic health care expenditures. We use thresholds of 5%, 10%, 15%, 25% and 40% shares of health expenditure relative to the household’s capacity-to-pay as defined in (5)) along with 95% confidence intervals. Panel A focuses on the WHO-method, where capacity is defined as non-subsistence expenditure [1]. Panel B defines the household’s capacity-to-pay by adult equivalent total household expenditure [26]. Panel C defines the household’s capacity-to-pay by adult equivalent total nonfood expenditure [27]. Table prepared with the xtable package in R [40]. The code to develop these values is available in Appendix; see S2 File.