Abstract
Objective
To comprehensively characterize the clinical presentation and course of care for concussion among 5- to 11-year-old children, identifying preinjury and injury factors potentially influencing clinical outcomes.
Study design
A single-institution retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from children ages 5- to 11 years with a concussion from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. Electronic health record data were abstracted for a 20% random sample of 292 patients.
Results
Three-fourths of patients (74.3%) presenting for concussion care had a standardized visiovestibular assessment performed. Almost all of those who eventually sought specialty care (92.9%) also had such an assessment, and only 42.9% patients initially seen in the emergency department or urgent care were examined in this manner. Of those assessed, 62.7% (n = 136) demonstrated deficits, with children ages 9-11 years more frequently exhibiting deficits than their younger counterparts (67.9% vs 53.2%; P = .03). Almost all patients (95.9%) reported at least 1 somatic symptom (eg, headache, dizziness), and one-half to two-thirds reported problems with sleep (54.1%) and visiovestibular symptoms (66.1%). Only 11.6% of children were referred for rehabilitation therapies and less than one-half of concussed patients (43.8%) were provided with a letter recommending school accommodations.
Conclusions
Somatic symptoms, sleep problems, and visiovestibular deficits are common in elementary school-aged children with concussion, but specific visiovestibular clinical assessments are often not performed, particularly in the emergency department setting. Recommendations for school accommodations are often not provided at the time of concussion diagnosis. Incorporating a standardized visiovestibular assessment into practice could facilitate early targeted school accommodations and thereby improve return to learning for elementary school-aged children with concussion.
Much of the literature on pediatric concussion has focused on characterizing concussions among adolescent athletes (ie, 12- to 19-year-olds in middle and high school).1 However, in our previous study of concussions presenting to a large pediatric healthcare network, almost one-third of 0- to 18-year-old children who sustained a concussion were in elementary school, ages 5-11 years, about whom much less is known.2 Previous research among concussed adolescents has identified differences in vestibular, balance, and visual deficits based on point of care (eg, presenting to the emergency department [ED] or specialty care practice), highlighting the importance of studying pediatric concussion across clinical settings to characterize fully the injury profile.3 In addition, deficits of the visio-vestibular system can affect reading and note-taking4 and predict longer recovery in adolescents.5–7 These deficits likely affect learning for elementary school-aged children as well, but are not well-characterized. An improved understanding of the characteristics of concussion sustained in elementary school-aged children could influence the clinical management of concussions.
The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize the clinical presentation and course of care among 5- to 11-year-old children diagnosed with a concussion within the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s (CHOP) pediatric health care network. Specifically, we aimed to describe preinjury and injury characteristics that might influence outcomes, including a comparison of older and younger elementary school-aged children within middle childhood to identify any differences that might be related to development.8
Methods
The CHOP network consists of more than 50 locations throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey, with 31 pediatric and adolescent primary care centers, 14 specialty care centers, a 535-bed inpatient hospital, 2 EDs, and 2 urgent care centers with more than 1 million visits per year. CHOP serves a racially and socioeconomically diverse population, and participates in most insurance plans, including Medicaid. A network-wide, unified electronic health record (EHR) system (EpicCare, Epic Systems, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin) is used across the network for all clinical care.
Two aspects of concussion care in the CHOP network deserve mention. First, CHOP introduced an EHR clinical decision support tool in July 2012, which standardized the documentation of concussion-specific assessments, including the visio-vestibular examination, as well as diagnosis and management. Second, all providers have been trained to perform a visio-vestibular assessment during their clinical examination for concussion.5,9 Briefly, the visio-vestibular examination consists of an assessment of smooth pursuits, horizontal and vertical saccades, vestibulo-ocular reflex, and complex tandem gait, as well as an estimate of the near point of convergence. The current visio-vestibular examination (Table I) is similar to the vestibular/oculomotor screen, but includes an additional measure of tandem gait.10
Table I.
Visiovestibular assessment for concussion
| Assessments | Procedures | Abnormal findings in concussion |
|---|---|---|
| Smooth pursuit | At a distance of 1 foot from patient, examiner moves visual target horizontally for 5 repetitions | Unable to follow visual target, headache or dizziness, eye pain, eyes watering, or eye redness provoked by pursuit |
| Saccades | Visual target held 2 feet apart, patient moves eyes horizontally then vertically between targets while holding head still up to 30 repetitions | Unable to visually jump back and forth between visual targets, headache or dizziness, eye pain, eyes watering, or eye redness provoked by saccades |
| Vestibulo-ocular reflex | Patient focuses on visual target at 1 foot from patient and shakes (horizontal) or nods head (vertical) while maintaining visual focus up to 30 repetitions | Unable to tolerate head movement with visual fixation, headache or dizziness, eye pain, eyes watering, or eye redness provoked by head movement |
| Near point of convergence | Use 20/30 visual target and bring towards nose; the near point of convergence is the distance from the forehead when the visual target becomes double | Visual target becomes double >6 cm from forehead* |
| Complex tandem gait | Tandem gait heel-toe forward and backward with eyes open and closed | Unable to maintain tandem gait or lifts arms up to maintain balance or demonstrates truncal sway off the midline while performing task |
Scheiman M, Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Investigator Group. The Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial: design, methods, and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2008; 15:24-36.
Patient Identification
We queried the CHOP EHR to identify all 5- to 11-year-olds with a concussion visit from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015 (n = 1626 patients), defined as a visit with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code for concussion.11 Patients with a concussion sustained before the beginning of the study, defined as those with a concussion-related CHOP visit within 6 months of their earliest visit in the study period (n = 95), were excluded. To minimize misclassification, we excluded patients who were also assigned an ICD-9-CM code for a more severe traumatic brain injury, as previously published (n = 4).12 Abstraction was performed on a simple random sample of 20% of patients (n = 306). Distributions of race/ethnicity, sex, age, insurance payor (private, Medicare/self-pay), location of first visit (primary care, outpatient, or ED/urgent care) were similar between the randomly selected sample and the underlying cohort. We also compared younger (age 5-8) with older (age 9-11) children in this cohort, corresponding with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s subdivision of middle childhood.8
EHR Abstraction
Manualized EHR abstraction was performed by 2 abstractors trained by a study author. Seven cases were abstracted in training; all differences were resolved until complete agreement was reached. Clinical data (variables described elsewhere in this article) were abstracted from the EHR and reviewed by 1 study author, resolving discrepancies with the team’s clinical expert. Based on abstraction, an additional 14 patients were excluded because there was no concussion (ie, erroneous ICD-9-CM coding; n = 6) or the first concussion visit during the study period was a follow-up visit for a previous concussion (n = 8). Of the 13 patients with more than 1 concussion during the study period, only the first concussion was included. The final sample included 292 patients aged 5- to 11-years-old with an initial visit for concussion within the CHOP network during the 1-year study period.
Abstracted Variables
The mechanism of injury was categorized in a standardized fashion, where external causes of injury codes (ie, fall, struck by object, struck by person) were assigned to each case and were subsequently characterized as sports or recreation related or not.13 Additionally abstracted were the self-reported number of previous concussions and pre-existing co-occurring conditions that might influence recovery from concussion. Co-occurring conditions (with corresponding ICD-9-CM codes) included learning/developmental problems (learning and developmental disabilities: 315.x; autism spectrum disorder: 299.x; and intellectual disability: 317.x, 318.x, 319.x), vision problems (strabismus: 378.x; amblyopia: 368.0x; hypermetropia: 367.0; and myopia: 367.1), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (314.x), migraine/headache (346.x), anxiety (300.x), hearing problems (ear disorders: 388.x and hearing loss: 389.x), mental/behavioral problems (mood disorders: 296.x, depression: 311.x, and oppositional defiant disorder: 313.81), motion sickness (994.6), and epilepsy (345.x).14,15
The patient’s point of entry into the healthcare system (at CHOP or elsewhere) was abstracted (ED/urgent care, primary care, specialty care [ie, sports medicine, trauma surgery, neurology]).12 Because not all children were seen for a formal clearance visit for return to organized sports, we defined the clinical course of care for the concussion—a proxy for time to recovery—as the number of days between the injury and the last CHOP visit for concussion, with abstraction of data from July 1, 2014, through January 29, 2018, to encompass all follow-up visits for the index concussion. Twenty-eight days was used as a clinically meaningful cutoff for comparisons regarding clinical course of care,16 because most pediatric concussions spontaneously recover within that timeframe.17 All provider types seen during the clinical course of care were noted; in addition, parent- or patient-reported visits to the school nurse or athletic trainer were noted. Documented referrals to therapy services (vision, vestibular, physical, speech, occupational, neuropsychology, and counseling) were recorded.
We also abstracted all patient or parent-reported concussion-related symptoms documented at any point during the clinical course of care. Symptoms from the PostConcussion Symptom Scale were grouped into 5 categories, including a specific visiovestibular subcategory to compare with the widespread use of a visiovestibular assessment across the CHOP Network: (1) somatic symptoms (headache, nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to noise, numbness or tingling), (2) visio-vestibular symptoms (balance deficits, dizziness, or visual problems), (3) sleep symptoms (fatigue, trouble falling asleep, sleeping more than usual, sleeping less than usual, or drowsiness), (4) emotional symptoms (irritability, sadness, nervousness, or feeling more emotional), and (5) cognitive symptoms (feeling slowed down, feeling mentally foggy, difficulty concentrating, or difficulty remembering).18 Whether a visio-vestibular examination was performed at each visit was recorded.18–20 Finally, any recommendations for school accommodations and return to physical activity were abstracted.
Statistical Analyses
We described the distribution of relevant demographic and clinical characteristics among patients with a concussion using frequencies and proportions for categorical variables, and median and IQR for continuous variables. We compared the distribution of these variables by age group and, for select variables (eg, visiovestibular assessment), by point of care using χ2 (for categorical variables) and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests (for continuous variables). All analyses were conducted using SAS software, Version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). This study was reviewed and approved by the CHOP Institutional Review Board.
Results
Patient and Injury Characteristics
The demographic characteristics of this cohort are fully described in Table II. We found no statistically significant differences in patient demographic characteristics between the 20% simple random sample and the overall cohort. In addition, no statistically significant differences in demographics were observed among younger (age 58 years) and older (age 9-11 years) elementary school-aged children. Younger children were more likely to have sustained their injury during a non-sports- and recreation-related activity than older children (41.9% and 32.6%, respectively; P = .05). Overall, 1 in 8 patients (13%) had a history of a prior concussion, and co-occurring medical diagnoses were identified in almost one-half of patients (44.9%), with no difference between the age subgroups. Specific co-occurring conditions identified in more than 5 patients per age group are presented in Table II, including learning/developmental problems, vision problems, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Table II.
Characteristics of patients aged 5-11 years presenting with a concussion, July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015 (n = 292)
| All ages (n = 292) |
5-8 years (n = 105) |
9-11 years (n = 187) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | P value |
| Demographic | |||||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 117 | 40.1 | 38 | 36.2 | 79 | 42.2 | .31 |
| Male | 175 | 59.9 | 67 | 63.8 | 108 | 57.8 | |
| Race/ethnicity | |||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 203 | 69.5 | 66 | 62.9 | 137 | 73.3 | .16 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 55 | 18.8 | 23 | 21.9 | 32 | 17.1 | |
| Hispanic | 11 | 3.8 | 3 | 2.9 | 8 | 4.3 | |
| Non-Hispanic other | 6 | 2.1 | 3 | 2.9 | 3 | 1.6 | |
| Unknown | 17 | 5.8 | 10 | 9.5 | 7 | 3.7 | |
| Payor | |||||||
| Private | 229 | 78.4 | 79 | 75.2 | 150 | 80.2 | .32 |
| Medicaid/self-pay | 63 | 21.6 | 26 | 24.8 | 37 | 19.8 | |
| Patient | |||||||
| Prior history of concussion | 38 | 13.0 | 11 | 10.5 | 27 | 14.4 | .33 |
| Any co-occurring condition* | 131 | 44.9 | 42 | 40.0 | 89 | 47.6 | .21 |
| Most common co-occurring conditions† | 101 | 34.6 | 32 | 30.5 | 69 | 36.9 | .27 |
| Learning/developmental problems | 47 | 16.1 | 23 | 21.9 | 24 | 12.8 | .04 |
| Vision problems | 42 | 14.4 | 9 | 8.6 | 33 | 17.6 | .03 |
| Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | 34 | 11.6 | 9 | 8.6 | 25 | 13.4 | .22 |
| Concussion | |||||||
| Sports- or recreation-related | 187 | 64.0 | 61 | 58.1 | 126 | 67.4 | .05 |
| Mechanism of injury | |||||||
| Fall | 138 | 47.3 | 57 | 54.3 | 81 | 43.3 | .21 |
| Struck by object | 91 | 31.2 | 27 | 25.7 | 64 | 34.2 | |
| Struck by person | 47 | 16.1 | 14 | 13.3 | 33 | 17.6 | |
| Other/unknown | 16 | 5.5 | 7 | 6.8 | 9 | 4.8 | |
Co-occurring conditions include learning/developmental problems (learning and developmental disabilities: 315.x [ICD-9-CM code]; autism spectrum disorder: 299.x; and intellectual disability: 317.x, 318.x, 319.x), vision problems (strabismus: 378.x; amblyopia: 368.0x; hypermetropia: 367.0; and myopia: 367.1), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (314.x), migraine/headache (346.x), anxiety (300.x), hearing problems (ear disorders: 388.x and hearing loss: 389.x), mental/behavioral problems (mood disorders: 296.x, depression: 311.x, and oppositional defiant disorder: 313.81), motion sickness (994.6), and epilepsy (345.x).
Specific co-occurring conditions identified in ≤5 patients per age group are not presented.
Clinical Course of Care
When considering the entire cohort, equal proportions of patients with a concussion reported initially presenting to primary care (49.0%) or the ED or urgent care setting (49.0%). The proportion that presented first to primary care was higher for those children who call the CHOP network their medical home (208/292 [61.1%]). The median clinical course of care was 2 visits (IQR, 2-3) within the CHOP network and there was no difference in clinical course of care based on point of entry into the health care system. Although patients rarely presented initially to specialty care (2.1%), almost one-fourth of patients (24.7%) were seen by a specialty care provider at some point during their course of care. One in 5 patients (21.9%) were documented as seeing a school nurse at some point during their clinical course of care. Overall, 39.4% of patients (n = 177) completed their clinical course within 1 week of injury (median, 10 days; IQR, 3-24 days), whereas 36.0% and 22.3% of patients had a clinical course of 8-28 days and ≥29 days, respectively. Overall, 11.6% were referred for various rehabilitative services, with vestibular therapy and vision therapy being the most common (n = 29 [9.9%] and n = 10 [3.4%], respectively).
Symptom Profile
Patients with a concussion reported a median of 4 distinct Post-Concussion Symptom Scale symptoms (IQR, 2-7) at any point during their course of care. Almost all patients (95.9%) reported at least 1 somatic symptom (Table III), and one-half to two-thirds reported problems with sleep (54.1%) and visiovestibular symptoms (66.1%). We did not observe age-related differences in the proportion of patients reporting somatic, sleep, emotional, or cognitive symptoms. However, 9- to 11-year-old patients were more likely to report visiovestibular symptoms than 5- to 8-year- olds (72.2% and 55.2%, respectively; P = .003).
Table III.
Concussion symptoms reported over the clinical course of care, by age group (n = 292)
| All ages (n = 292) |
5-8 years (n = 105) |
9-11 years (n = 187) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | P value |
| Somatic | 280 | 95.9 | 100 | 95.2 | 180 | 96.3 | .67 |
| Visiovestibular | 193 | 66.1 | 58 | 55.2 | 135 | 72.2 | .003 |
| Sleep | 158 | 54.1 | 58 | 55.2 | 100 | 53.5 | .77 |
| Emotional | 67 | 22.9 | 22 | 21.0 | 45 | 24.1 | .54 |
| Cognitive | 112 | 38.4 | 36 | 34.3 | 76 | 40.6 | .28 |
Visio-vestibular Assessment
Overall, three-fourths of patients (74.3%) had a visio-vestibular assessment at some point during their clinical course of care in the CHOP Network. Among those whose initial point of care was at CHOP, 83.8% of patients received a targeted visio-vestibular assessment documented on the same day as their initial visit. This proportion varied by point of care; only 6 of 14 patients (42.9%) seen at CHOP ED/urgent care received an initial assessment compared with 101 of 112 patients (90.2%) initially seen at CHOP primary care (Table IV). Patients who were ever seen by specialty care at CHOP were more likely to have such an assessment compared with those who were never seen by specialty care (65/70 specialty patients [92.9%] vs 152/222 patients never seen by specialty care [68.5%]; P < .001). Of the 74% with a documented visio-vestibular assessment, 62.7% (n = 136) had identifiable deficits. A greater proportion of concussed patients ages 9-11 years had abnormal findings upon visiovestibular assessment compared with those ages 5-8 years (95/140 patients [67.9%] and 41/77 patients [53.2%], respectively; P = .03). Those who reported visio-vestibular symptoms were more likely to have visio-vestibular deficits upon examination (107/156 patients with symptoms [68.7%]) compared with those who did not report visiovestibular symptoms (29/61 patients without symptoms [47.5%]; P = .004). The most commonly noted deficits were in gaze stability (41.7%), tandem gait (40.0%), and saccades (38.8%), with deficits in convergence (18.4%) and smooth pursuits (16.8%) occurring at lower proportions.
Table IV.
Proportion of patients by initial point of care within the CHOP Care Network with and without documented visio-vestibular assessment (n = 292)
| CHOP provider |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 292) |
Primary care (n = 127) |
ED/urgent care (n = 58) |
Specialty outpatient (n = 5) |
Non-CHOP provider (n = 102) |
||||||
| Visio-vestibular assessment | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % |
| Documented | 109 | 83.8 | 101 | 90.2 | 6 | 42.9 | 2 | 50 | n/a | n/a |
| Not documented | 75 | 25.7 | 15 | 11.8 | 44 | 75.9 | 1 | 20 | 15 | 14.7 |
n/a, not applicable.
Return to Learn and Return to Play
Fewer than one-half of all of the concussed patients (43.8%) were provided with a letter recommending standardized school accommodations, such as taking pacing breaks for symptoms, extra time for assignments, or larger printed font or use of audiobooks.21 Slightly more than one-half (56.2%) had documentation of clearance for return to play/activities at the end of their clinical course; there were no differences in this aspect between the age subgroups. The vast majority of patients seen only in the ED (38/40 [95.0%]) were not provided with a letter for school accommodations.
Discussion
Even though almost one-third of pediatric concussions presenting for medical care occur in children less than 12 years of age, little is known about concussions presenting across a broad sample of healthcare settings in this age group.11 Findings from this comprehensive description of ambulatory elementary school-aged concussions, including those presenting to a primary care setting, have important implications for the management of concussion in this age range.
With one-half of 5- to 8-year-olds and three-fourths of 9- to 11-year-olds reporting visio-vestibular symptoms, this high prevalence was similar to rates observed in adolescents, among whom these symptoms and the associated physical findings also predict prolonged recovery.9,19 Although visio-vestibular deficits can affect school function, affecting both reading as well as note taking, one-fourth of patients with a concussion in this study were not assessed for these deficits.15 Differences were found in clinical practice by the point of care, with most children seen in primary care (90.2%), and virtually all children eventually seen in specialty care (92.9%), being assessed with a visio-vestibular examination, whereas those evaluated only in the ED were much less likely to have this assessment (42.9%). Because this assessment captures neurophysiologic function beyond self-reported symptoms, it may add clinical value, particularly in younger children, who may be less able to describe adequately all their symptoms. Of note, all these rates are likely higher within the CHOP network compared with other healthcare settings due to concerted, system-wide training and implementation of an EHR-based clinical decision support tool that resulted in the increased use of this assessment from 1.8% to 71.0%.22 In addition, in our cohort, there was a substantial group of children with deficits or symptom provocation upon assessment who did not self-report visiovestibular symptoms, with a smaller proportion of younger children (ages 5-8 years) reporting these symptoms than older children (ages 9-11 years). This finding maybe related to the developmental immaturity of younger children failing to recognize and report visio-vestibular symptoms, making a clinical assessment of this system even more important in the diagnosis and management of concussion in this age range. Because these visio-vestibular deficits are also associated with persistent symptomatology and poorer outcomes, identifying children with these deficits could be important in crafting relevant school-based accommodations for recovery from acute concussion.9,21,23 Finally, although there is increasing evidence that vestibular oculomotor therapy is effective in reducing concussion symptoms among some patients with persistent visio-vestibular deficits, only 11.6% of our cohort were referred for vestibular or visual therapy, suggesting that rehabilitation for these deficits may be underutilized.24–26
Although the observed concussion symptom profile likely substantially affects a young child’s ability to return to learning and playing, fewer than one-half of the children in our study, and very few seen only in the ED, received guidance for school accommodations after injury, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.27 One prior study found that children received significantly more academic accommodations after a concussion diagnosis in the ED when they were provided with school-focused discharge instructions and a return to learn letter that specifically listed recommended accommodations.28 Another study of children ages 8- 18 years found that a little more than one-half (51.3%) received academic accommodations after the diagnosis of concussion in the ED, with accommodations being more likely if they had a co-occurring history of migraines or learning disability, a sport-related concussion, commercial insurance, or their parents’ primary language was English.29 In our study, close to 50% of our cohort of elementary school-aged children had co-occurring conditions that likely interact with concussion (eg, 16.1% with diagnosed learning disabilities, 14.4% with vision disorders, and 11.6% with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). These conditions may be exacerbated in the classroom after injury and would likely benefit from academic accommodations following injury.14,15,30 Our results suggest that younger children, in particular, are not being provided with recommendations for school accommodations as frequently as their middle-school and high-school counterparts, further highlighting gaps in clinical care.
Slightly more than one-half of the patients had formal documentation of clearance to return to play in sports, which is lower than the reported rate in CHOP adolescent patients with a concussion. This finding likely aligns with lower rates of organized sports participation in this age range, as well as less frequent sport- and recreation-related mechanisms of injury.31,32 However, most, if not all, of these younger children are returning to physical education, recreational activities, or free play, where instructions for safe, gradual return to activity after a concussion would still be relevant. This gap represents an area that could be further addressed with additional interventions to optimize outcomes.
There are limited previous data characterizing the course of care for younger preadolescent children with a concussion. In this study, the median clinical course was 10 days, indicating that many young children likely have a self-limited course of spontaneous recovery after concussion, similar to their older adolescent counterparts.33–36 However, close to one-quarter had a clinical course longer than 28 days, a proportion that mirrors reported rates of prolonged symptomatology for older children.30,37 These data indicate that persistent symptoms from concussion are also a concern in this younger population, with implications for function in life and in school. Recent pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines have urged assessment of factors that predict longer recovery in children after a concussion; these factors may vary by pediatric age range.38
Our study also revealed that, for some, the concussion burden at this age is already notable; 1 in 8 children had a prior history of concussion. A history of multiple concussions may be an important consideration when contemplating risk-bearing activities, such as contact sports.16,39–45 Our previous work quantified that, for those children sustaining at least 2 concussions by age 15, one-quarter will experience at least a third injury within the next 2 years, suggesting that, for some of these elementary school-aged children, there is a strong likelihood of having a third or fourth concussion before they leave high school.46 In addition, our previous work has also indicated that those with a history of concussion were more likely to demonstrate visiovestibular disorders in a dose-response fashion correlating with persisting symptoms.9,47 These observations are important clinical considerations in the ongoing management of children with concussion at this age, especially those ages 9-11 years, who present with more visiovestibular deficits than their younger counterparts.
Our study had several limitations. As a retrospective cohort study, data were not collected as systematically as they might have been if collected prospectively. However, an EHR clinical decision support tool with standardized documentation of concussion-specific assessments for diagnosis and management, including the use of a visio-vestibular examination, somewhat mitigates this issue. The reliability of the visio-vestibular examination remains an area for future study. Since its introduction in 2012, the vast majority of concussion visits within the CHOP network use this tool.21 Second, although return to play in organized sports is a commonly used outcome in youth concussion studies, its role in determining “time to recovery” in elementary school-aged children was less useful due to lower rates of participation in organized sports where they might be less likely to return to a provider to receive formal medical clearance. Instead, we used length of time seen in outpatient clinics as a proxy for time to recovery because actual recovery could not be determined in this retrospective cohort. Because children seeking ongoing care for concussion at CHOP would likely have documentation, the clinical course of care was the most practical and meaningful outcome for elementary school-aged children. CHOP providers may also be unique in that a concerted effort has been undertaken in the form of extensive training and clinical decision support across the network to facilitate concussion diagnosis and management, including training in the use of the visiovestibular examination in concussion.22 Finally, the CHOP population of patients may not be completely representative of the overall population because the majority were non-Hispanic white and had private insurance. Private insurance and the perception of insurance adequacy can influence decisions to seek care at the time of the injury.48 Further study of larger, nationally representative samples comparing across ethnicities and insurance types is needed to allow more specific exploration of these demographic factors.
Overall, although symptoms and clinical course observed in our study were similar to those observed in adolescents, we demonstrated a clinical practice gap in identifying common visio-vestibular deficits after a concussion in all care settings, but particularly in the ED, potentially influencing subsequent management. Children ages 9-11 years in this cohort had a higher rate of visio-vestibular deficits than their younger counterparts, highlighting the importance of a visiovestibular assessment in the clinical diagnosis of concussion, with substantial management implications for school-based accommodations for return to learn during recovery. Further development of clinical decision support tools may aid clinicians in closing this gap and improving concussion care for children in this age group.
Acknowledgments
Supported by an intergovernmental personnel act agreement between the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The findings and conclusions inthis report arethose of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
We thank Julia Lockyer, Sayaka Ogawa, and Julia Vanni for their contribution to data collection for this study.
Glossary
- CHOP
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
- ED
Emergency department
- HER
Electronic health record
- ICD-9-CM
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Statement
Data sharing statement available at www.jpeds.com.
References
- 1.Kirkwood MW, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Randolph C, McCrea M, Anderson VA. Management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a neuropsychological review from injury through recovery. Clin Neuropsychol 2008;22:769–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suskauer SJ, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, Benzel EC, Breiding MJ, Broomand C, et al. Strengthening the evidence base: recommendations for future research identified through the development of CDC’s Pediatric Mild TBI Guideline. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019;34:215–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arbogast KB, Curry AE, Pfeiffer MR, Zonfrillo MR, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Breiding MJ, et al. Point of health care entry for youth with concussion within a large pediatric care network. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170:e160294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chrisman SPD, Lowry S, Herring SA, Kroshus E, Hoopes TR, Higgins SK, et al. Concussion incidence, duration, and return to school and sport in 5- to 14-year-old American football athletes. J Pediatr 2018;207:176–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Howell DR, Kriz P, Mannix RC, Kirchberg T, Master CL, Meehan WP. Concussion symptom profiles among child, adolescent, and young adult athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2019;29:391–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nelson LD, Loman MM, LaRoche AA, Furger RE, McCrea MA. Baseline performance and psychometric properties of the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (Child-SCAT3) in 5- to 13-year-old athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2017;27:381–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murdaugh DL, Ono KE, Morris SO, Burns TG. Effects of developmental age on symptom reporting and neurocognitive performance in youth after sports-related concussion compared to control athletes. J Child Neurol 2018;33:474–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Child Development. Middle childhood (6-8 years old). www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/childdevelopment/positiveparenting/middle.html. Accessed February 1, 2020.
- 9.Master CL, Scheiman M, Gallaway M, Goodman A, Robinson RL, Master SR, et al. Vision diagnoses are common after concussion in adolescents. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016;55:260–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mucha A, Collins MW, Elbin RJ, Furman JM, Troutman-Enseki C, DeWolf RM, et al. A Brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2479–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Risen SR, Reesman J, Yenokyan G, Slomine BS, Suskauer SJ. The course of concussion recovery in children 6-12 years ofage: experience from an interdisciplinary rehabilitation clinic. PM R 2017;9:874–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suskauer SJ, Rane S, Reesman J, Slomine BS. Caregiver-report of symptoms following traumatic brain injury in a small clinical sample of preschool-aged children. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2018;11:7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mayer AR, Wertz C, Ryman SG, Storey EP, Park G, Phillips J, et al. Neurosensory deficits vary as a function of point of care in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2018;35:1178–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sady MD, Vaughan CG, Gioia GA. School and the concussed youth: recommendations for concussion education and management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2011;22:701–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swanson MW, Weise KK, Dreer LE, Johnston J, Davis RD, Ferguson D, et al. Academic difficulty and vision symptoms in children with concussion. Optom Vis Sci 2017;94:60–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zemek R, Barrowman N, Freedman SB, Gravel J, Gagnon I, McGahem C, et al. Clinical risk score for persistent postconcussion symptoms among children with acute concussion in the ED. JAMA 2016;315:1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ledoux AA, Tang K, Yeates KO, Pusic MV, Boutis K, Craig WR, et al. Natural progression of symptom change and recovery from concussion in a pediatric population. JAMA Pediatr 2019;173:e183820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corwin DJ, Wiebe DJ, Zonfrillo MR, Grady MF, Robinson RL, Goodman AM, et al. Vestibular deficits following youth concussion. J Pediatr 2015;166:1221–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bernard CO, Ponsford JA, McKinlay A, McKenzie D, Krieser D. Predictors of post-concussive symptoms in young children: injury versus non-injury related factors. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2016;22:793–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Corwin DJ, Propert KJ, Zorc JJ, Zonfrillo MR, Wiebe DJ. Use of the vestibular and oculomotor examination for concussion in a pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37:1219–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arbogast KB, Curry AE, Metzger KB, Kessler RS, Bell JM, Haarbauer-Krupa J, et al. Improving primary care provider practices in youth concussion management. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017;56:854–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haarbauer-Krupa J, Arbogast KB, Metzger KB, Greenspan AI, Kessler R, Curry AE, et al. Variations in mechanisms of injury for children with concussion. J Pediatr 2018;197:241–8.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corwin DJ, Zonfrillo MR, Master CL, Arbogast KB, Grady MF, Robinson RL, et al. Characteristics of prolonged concussion recovery in a pediatric subspecialty referral population. J Pediatr 2014;165: 1207–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iverson GL, Gardner AJ, Terry DP, Ponsford JL, Sils AK, Broshek DK, et al. Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:941–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howell DR, O’Brien MJ, Beasley MA, Mannix RC, Meehan WP III. Initial somatic symptoms are associated with prolonged symptom duration following concussion in adolescents. Acta Paediatr 2016;105: e426–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kontos AP, Deitrick JM, Collins MW, Mucha A. Review of vestibular and oculomotor screening and concussion rehabilitation. J Athl Train 2017;52:256–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Master CL, Master SR, Wiebe DJ, Storey EP, Lockyer JE, Podolak OE, et al. Vision and vestibular system dysfunction predicts prolonged concussion recovery in children. Clin J Sport Med 2017;28:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pearce KL, Sufrinko A, Lau BC, Henry L, Collins MW, Kontos AP. Near point of convergence after a sport-related concussion. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:3055–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Snedden TR, Pierpoint LA, Currie DW, Comstock RD, Grubenhoff JA. Postconcussion academic support in children who attend a primary care provider follow-up visit after presenting to the emergency department. J Pediatr 2019;209:168–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Giza CC, Hovda DA. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 2014;75(Suppl 4):S24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Storey EP, Wiebe DJ, D’Alonzo BA, Nixon-Cave K, Jackson-Coty J, Goodman AM, et al. Vestibular rehabilitation is associated with visuovestibular improvement in pediatric concussion. J Neurol Phys Ther 2018;42:134–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Nettel-Aguirre A, Barlow KM, Emery CA. Cervicovestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:1294–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gallaway M, Scheiman M, Mitchell GL. Vision therapy for postconcussion vision disorders. Optom Vis Sci 2017;94:68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mucha A, DeWitt J, Greenspan AI. The CDC guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children: what physical therapists need to Know. Phys Ther 2019;99:1278–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halstead ME, McavoyK, Devore CD, Carl R, Lee M, Logan K. Returning to learning following a concussion. Pediatrics 2013;132:948–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blackwell LS, Robinson AF, Proctor MR, Taylor AM. Same care, different populations. J Child Neurol 2017;32:327–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zuckerbraun NS, Atabaki S, Collins MW, Thomas D, Gioia GA. Use of modified acute concussion evaluation tools in the emergency department. Pediatrics 2014;133:635–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stache S, Howell D, Meehan WP. Concussion management practice patterns among sports medicine physicians. Clin J Sport Med 2016;26: 381–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Putukian M, Riegler K, Amalfe S, Bruce J, Echemendia R. Preinjury and postinjury factors that predict sports-related concussion and clinical recovery time. Clin J Sport Med 2018. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McCrea M, Guskiewicz K, Randolph C, Barr WB, Hammeke TA, Marshall SW, et al. Incidence, clinical course, and predictors of prolonged recovery time following sport-related concussion in high school and college athletes. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2013;19:22–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Williams RM, Puetz TW, Giza CC, Broglio SP. Concussion recovery time among high school and collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med 2015;45:893–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kamins J, Bigler E, Covassin T, Hnery L, Kemp S, Leddy JJ, et al. What is the physiological time to recovery after concussion? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:935–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Henry LC, Elbin RJ, Collins MW, Marchetti G, Kontos AP. Examining recovery trajectories after sport-related concussion with a multimodal clinical assessment approach. Neurosurgery 2016;78:232–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, Breiding MJ, Haegerich TM, Gioia GA, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on the diagnosis and management of mild traumatic brain injury among children. JAMA Pediatr 2018;172:e182853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Slobounov S, Slobounov E, Sebastianelli W, Cao C, Newell K. Differential rate of recovery in athletes after first and second concussion episodes. Neurosurgery 2007;61:338–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Eisenberg MA, Andrea J, Meehan W, Mannix R. Time interval between concussions and symptom duration. Pediatrics 2013;132:8–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wasserman EB, Kerr ZY, Zuckerman SL, Covassin T. Epidemiology of sports-related concussions in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes from 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:226–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nelson LD, Guskiewicz KM, Barr WB, Hammeke TA, Randolph C, Ahn KW, et al. Age differences in recovery after sport-related concussion: a comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train 2016;51:142–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
