Table 4.
Comparison | F0 M | F0 M + P | F1 M | F1 P | F1 M + P | F2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entukura—Enzirabahima 1 | 0.2080 (+/−) | 0.0132 (+/−) | > 0.0001 (−/+) | 0.4754 (−/+) | 0.7861 (+/−) | 1.0000 (−/+) |
Entukura—Enzirabahima 2 | 0.0742 (+/−) | 0.0917 (+/−) | 0.0001 (−/+) | 0.2598 (−/+) | 0.7861 (−/+) | 1.0000 (+/−) |
Enzirabahima 1—Enzirabahima 2 | 0.5355 (+/−) | 0.3949 (−/+) | 0.0928 (+/−) | 0.5941 (−/+) | 0.5762 (−/+) | 1.0000 (+/−) |
mCmCGG–CCGG | > 0.0001 (−/+) | > 0.0001 (+/−) | 0.1353 (+/−) | > 0.0001 (−/+) | > 0.0001 (+/−) | 0.0023 (−/+) |
mCmCGG–CmCGG | 0.0659 (−/+) | > 0.0001 (+/−) | 0.7432 (+/−) | > 0.0001 (−/+) | 0.0094 (+/−) | > 0.0001 (−/+) |
mCmCGG–mCCGG/i-CmCGG | 0.0002 (−/+) | > 0.0001 (+/−) | 0.0403 (+/−) | 0.0008 (−/+) | 0.0283 (+/−) | > 0.0001 (−/+) |
CCGG–CmCGG | > 0.0001 (+/−) | 0.0160 (+/−) | 0.5635 (−/+) | 0.7531 (+/−) | 0.0083 (−/+) | 0.0690 (−/+) |
CCGG–mCCGG/i-CmCGG | 0.0005 (+/−) | 0.4431 (+/−) | 0.7432 (+/−) | 0.1904 (+/−) | 0.0017 (−/+) | 0.1762 (−/+) |
CmCGG–mCCGG/i-CmCGG | 0.0659 (−/+) | 0.0868 (−/+) | 0.2768 (+/−) | 0.2465 (+/−) | 0.6162 (−/+) | 0.5703 (+/−) |
Numbers highlighted in bold indicate significant differences
(+/−) indicates that a larger portion of the former group of the comparison is shared with the loci type in question than the latter, while (−/+) indicates the reverse. F0 M—loci that match to the F0 mother and are present in the F1 progeny, F0 M + P—loci that match to both F0 mother and F0 father which are present in the F1 progeny, F1 M—loci which were novel in the F1 mother that are shared with the F2 progeny, F1 P—loci which in the F1 father that are shared with the F2 progeny, F1 M + P—loci shared in the F1 mother and F1 father that are not shared with the F0 parents, F2—de novo loci in the F2 progeny