Table 3.
Comparison of CNA_origin predictions with those of other algorithms.
| Cancer | Predictor | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA | CNA_origin | 0.8750 | 0.9231 | 0.8984 |
| LSTM | 0.8713 | 0.8462 | 0.8585 | |
| RF | 0.8556 | 0.8645 | 0.8601 | |
| XGboost | 0.8214 | 0.8846 | 0.8519 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.7916 | 0.8735 | 0.8306 | |
| COADREAD | CNA_origin | 0.8158 | 0.7381 | 0.7750 |
| LSTM | 0.8571 | 0.8077 | 0.8317 | |
| RF | 0.7659 | 0.6923 | 0.7272 | |
| XGboost | 0.7959 | 0.7500 | 0.7723 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.6000 | 0.7346 | 0.6605 | |
| GBM | CNA_origin | 0.9310 | 0.8438 | 0.8852 |
| LSTM | 0.8913 | 0.8913 | 0.8913 | |
| RF | 0.8627 | 0.8627 | 0.8627 | |
| XGboost | 0.9535 | 0.8913 | 0.9213 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.8870 | 0.8593 | 0.8730 | |
| KIRC | CNA_origin | 0.8889 | 0.9600 | 0.9231 |
| LSTM | 0.8837 | 0.9268 | 0.9048 | |
| RF | 0.9056 | 0.8571 | 0.8807 | |
| XGboost | 0.8780 | 0.8780 | 0.8780 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.8085 | 0.9268 | 0.8636 | |
| OV | CNA_origin | 0.8980 | 0.8627 | 0.8800 |
| LSTM | 0.7843 | 0.9091 | 0.8421 | |
| RF | 0.7826 | 0.9000 | 0.8372 | |
| XGboost | 0.7551 | 0.8409 | 0.7957 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.8461 | 0.7586 | 0.8000 | |
| UCEC | CNA_origin | 0.6792 | 0.7200 | 0.6990 |
| LSTM | 0.6897 | 0.6557 | 0.6723 | |
| RF | 0.6451 | 0.6060 | 0.6250 | |
| XGboost | 0.7407 | 0.6557 | 0.6957 | |
| CNA_zhang | 0.7419 | 0.4693 | 0.5750 |
The bold values are the best performance among counterparts.