Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;10:13497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70539-4

Table 3.

Comparison between the steroid exacerbated and non-exacerbated myasthenia gravis groups between our series and Bae et al. series.

Our series Bae et al.
Exacerbated (n = 1) Non-exacerbated (n = 44) Exacerbated (n = 23) Non-exacerbated (n = 32)
Demographic features
Age (years) 56 66.43 ± 16.38 52.3 ± 13.4 41.1 ± 15.4
Male/female ratio 1 29/15 8/15 12/20
Age at onset (years) 56 65.22 ± 16.32 48.5 ± 14.0 39.8 ± 15.4
Pre-treatment clinical status of MG
Pre-treatment dose of piridostigmine (mg) 240 152.14 ± 94.96 259.8 ± 131.9 215.6 ± 115.1
MSS score 12 12.66 ± 1.66 9.4 ± 2.0 12.5 ± 1.6
Functional MG scale score 4 3.22 ± 0.82 4.4 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.6
Thymomatous MG (n) 0 2 8 14
Thymectomized MG (n) 0 15 13 17
Laboratory findings
Patients with AChR-Ab (%) 1 90.9%
Outcome after use of PDN
Reason for PDN use, bulbar symtoms (n) 1 29 23 18
Total PDN dose 100 62.5 ± 15.87 66.7 ± 11.6 62.3 ± 14.5
Dose per body weight (mg/kg) 1 0.9 ± 0.15 1.3 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.4
Non-responders (within 6 weeks) 0 1 5 16