Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;106(3):504–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.08.005

Table III.

Summary of results following N95 FFR decontamination for each outcome of interest and chemical disinfectant type

Disinfectant Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance Viral/bacterial load Fit Physical traits Potential health risks
Sodium hypochlorite No change in aerosol penetration, aerosol penetration <5% maintained (N = 4) No change in airflow resistance, NIOSH standards maintained (N = 3) Log10 reduction in viral levels of 0.66 ± 0.47 to 4.37 ± 0.4 depending on concentration used (N = 2) Not assessed Tarnished metallic nosepieces (N = 4) Potential for low-level chlorine exposure when FFR is rehydrated during respiration (N = 1)
Aerosol penetration exceeded 5% for particles >63 nm (N = 1)a 0% relative survival of bacteria (N = 1) Oxidized staples (N = 2)
Mean reduction in bacteria levels >99% (N = 1) Yellowing of nose pads (N = 1)
Bleeding of lettering (N = 1)
Stiffening of filter media and elastic straps (N = 1)
Dissolved nose pad (50%) (N = 1)
Bleach odour following treatment (N = 3)
Liquid H2O2 No change in aerosol penetration, aerosol penetration <5% maintained (N = 2) No change in airflow resistance, NIOSH standards maintained (N = 1) Not assessed Not assessed Oxidized staples (N = 1) Did not deposit significant quantities of toxic residues on the FFRs (N = 1)
Slight fading of the label lettering (N = 1)
No changes in odour (N = 1)
Vaporized H2O2 No change in aerosol penetration, aerosol penetration <5% maintained following one (N = 2) and three decontamination cycles (N = 1) No change in airflow resistance, NIOSH standards maintained (N = 2) No viable virus, or virus or bacteriophage below detectable assay limit (N = 4) Fit factor >100 achieved following 1, 3, 5, 10 cycles with the VHP ARD system, but only following one cycle using the Sterrad 100NX (N = 1)b Slight tarnishing of metallic nosebands (N = 2) Did not deposit significant quantities of toxic residues on the FFRs (N = 2)
Aerosol penetration exceeded 5% for four out of six FFR following three decontamination cycles (N = 1) Fit factor >100 achieved following 3 × 2 h wear + decontamination cycles (N = 1) No changes in physical appearance (N = 3)
No changes in odour (N = 3)
Ethanol Aerosol penetration post sterilization exceeded 5% for particles >63 nm (N = 1)a NIOSH standards maintained post sterilization (N = 1) Relative bacterial survival rates of 68–89% depending on ethanol concentration (N = 1) Fit factor >100 achieved for six replicate FFRs following one decontamination cycle, but not all six replicates achieved a fit factor >100 following two and three decontamination cycles (N = 1) No changes in physical appearance (N =1) Not assessed
Relative bacterial survival rates of 20–33% depending on ethanol concentration 24 h post sterilization (N = 1)
Viral levels below detectable assay limit (N = 1)
Isopropyl alcohol Aerosol penetration exceeded 5% for particle penetration (N = 1) Not assessed Not assessed Not assessed Fading of ink strap (N = 1) Not assessed
Aerosol penetration post sterilization exceeded 5% for particles >76 nm (N = 1)a No changes in physical appearance (N = 1)
EtO No change in aerosol penetration post sterilization, aerosol penetration <5% maintained (N = 3) No change in airflow resistance post sterilization, NIOSH standards maintained (N = 2) No viable virus (N = 1) Fit factor >100 achieved for four FFR models following one and three decontamination cycles (N = 1)b No changes in physical appearance (N = 4) Presence of ethylene glycol monoacetate on FFR straps, safety currently unclear (N = 1)
No changes in odour (N = 3)

FFR, filtering facepiece respirator; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; EtO, ethylene oxide.

N refers to number of studies.

a

Lin et al. used an challenge aerosol with a count median diameter of 101 ± 10 and a geometric size deviation of 2.01 ± 0.08, and evaluated penetration of particle sizes from 14.6 to 594 nm.

b

Based on normal breathing and deep breathing exercises only.