Table 3:
Authors | Year | Trial | NCTID | Phase | Number Enrolled |
Inclusion Criteria |
Primary Outcome | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morikawa et al.10 | 2017 | Intermittent High-Dose Lapatinib in Tandem With Capecitabine for HER2 Overexpressed/Amplified Metastatic Breast Cancer With Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases | NCT02650752 | 1 | 11 | HER2+ BCBM | Maximum tolerated dose | No improvement in survival |
Hurvitz et al.11 | 2018 | Phase 1b/2 Trial Using Lapatinib, Everolimus and Capecitabine for Treatment of HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer With CNS Metastasis | NCT01783756 | 1/2 | 9 | HER2+ BCBM | Objective response rate | The combination of lapatinib, everolimus, and capecitabine is well tolerated and yielded a 27% response rate in the CNS at 12 weeks in heavily pretreated participants |
Murthy et al.12 | 2018 | A Study of Tucatinib vs. Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine & Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced HER2+ Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB) | NCT02614794 | 2 | 612 | HER2+ BCBM | Progression-free survival | Tucatinib in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab had acceptable toxicity and showed preliminary anti-tumor activity |
Murthy et al.23 | 2020 | The triple combination lowered the risk of disease progression or death by 52% | ||||||
Yardley et al.13 | 2018 | Cabazitaxel Plus Lapatinib as Therapy for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Intracranial Metastases | NCT01934894 | 2 | 11 | HER2+ BCBM | Objective response rate, tolerated dose and toxicity | The combination of cabazitaxel plus lapatinib was not feasible because of toxicity and because no objective CNS activity was seen in the 5 evaluable patients |
Cortés et al.14 | 2015 | Lux-Breast 3; Afatinib Alone or in Combination With Vinorelbine in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Positive Breast Cancer Suffering From Brain Metastases | NCT01441596 | 2 | 121 | HER2+ BCBM | Patient benefit rate | Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigator's choice of treatments, and afatinib-containing treatments were less tolerated |
Van Swearingen et al.15 | 2018 | A Study Of Everolimus, Trastuzumab And Vinorelbine In HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases | NCT01305941 | 2 | 32 | HER2+ BCBM | Objective response rate | Intracranial response rate to the triple therapy was low and progression-free survival/overall survival was like historical control |
Wu et al.16 | 2015 | Bevacizumab With Etoposide and Cisplatin in Breast Cancer Patients With Brain and/or Leptomeningeal Metastasis | NCT01281696 | 2 | 40 | Histological confirmed invasive breast cancer | Objective response rate | Bevacizumab combined with etoposide and cisplatin exhibited promising efficacy in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis |
Bachelot et al.17 | 2013 | Lapatinib Ditosylate and Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases | NCT00967031 | 2 | 45 | HER2+ BCBM | Objective response rate | Objective CNS response was observed in 65·9%of cases; all were partial responses. The combination of lapatinib and capecitabine is active as first-line treatment of HER2+ BCBM |
Cao et al.18 | 2015 | Radiation Therapy With or Without Temozolomide in Treating Women With Brain Metastases and Breast Cancer | NCT00875355 | 2 | 100 | BCBM | Objective response rate | WBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer |
Lin et al.19 | 2011 | Brain Metastases In ErbB2-Positive Breast Cancer | NCT00437073 | 2 | 22 | HER2+ BCBM | Objective response rate | The study was closed early due to excess toxicity and lack of efficacy in the lapatinib plus topotecan arm. No responses were observed in the lapatinib plus topotecan arm. Promising indications of CNS activity were noted for lapatinib plus capecitabine. The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan was not active and was associated with excess toxicity |
Pivot et al.20 | 2015 | Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Trastuzumab Plus Capecitabine in ErbB2 (HER2) Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer | NCT00820222 | 3 | 540 | HER2+ BCBM | CNS relapse | No difference was detected between lapatinib-capecitabine and trastuzumab-capecitabine for the incidence of CNS metastases; serious adverse events were reported in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively |
Brown et al.21 | 2017 | Stereotactic Radiation Therapy With or Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Brain Metastases | NCT00377156 | 3 | 213 | Brain Metastases | Neurocognitive progression | No significant differences in survival according to receipt of WBRT. The use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulted in less cognitive deterioration |
Prat et al.22 | 2016 | Study Comparing GW572016 And Letrozole Versus Letrozole In Subjects With Advanced Or Metastatic Breast Cancer | NCT00073528 | 3 | 1285 | HER2+ BCBM | Progression-free survival | Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative disease with a HER2-enriched profile may benefit from lapatinib in combination with endocrine therapy. Patients with luminal A/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer might be good candidates for letrozole monotherapy in the first-line setting |