Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 12;24(9):2520–2531. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02808-2

Table 2.

Baseline attitudes towards injectable PrEP characteristics liked and disliked, by region, sex at birth and cohort

Total
(n = 199)
Total
(n = 199)
Total
(n = 199)
Regional comparisons Sex-at-birth comparisons Cohort comparisons
Overall
(n = 199)
U.S.
(n = 106)
Non-U.S.
(n = 93)
P-value Male (n = 67) Female (n = 132) P-value C1
(n = 110)
C2
(n = 89)
P-value
Liked characteristics (%)
 Nothing 2.5 2.8 2.1 0.76 3.0 2.3 0.76 3.6 1.1 0.26
 HIV prevention 42.2 39.6 45.2 0.43 41.8 42.4 0.93 40.0 44.9 0.48
 Easier to use 58.8 73.6 41.9 < 0.01 61.2 57.6 0.62 60.9 56.2 0.50
 Long duration 47.7 54.7 39.8 0.04 37.3 53.0 0.04 50.9 43.8 0.32
 Discreet 14.1 17.9 9.7 0.10 7.5 17.4 0.06 13.6 10.1 0.84
 Offered by provider 12.6 19.8 4.3 < 0.01 9.0 14.4 0.27 12.7 4.5 0.94
 No interruption of sex 13.6 20.7 5.4 < 0.01 11.9 14.4 0.63 15.4 5.6 0.39
Disliked characteristics (%)
 Nothing 24.1 14.1 35.5 < 0.01 20.9 25.8 0.45 24.5 23.6 0.88
 No HIV prevention 12.1 14.1 9.7 0.33 13.4 11.4 0.67 16.4 6.7 0.04
 Painful 36.2 40.6 31.2 0.17 34.3 37.1 0.70 33.6 39.3 0.41
 Side effects 40.7 46.2 34.4 0.09 38.8 41.7 0.70 39.1 42.7 0.61
 No reversal 12.1 17.0 6.4 0.02 9.0 13.6 0.34 15.4 7.9 0.10
 Offered by provider 7.0 8.5 5.4 0.39 6.0 7.6 0.68 10.0 3.4 0.07
 Not discreet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Cost 14.1 21.7 5.4 < 0.01 11.9 15.1 0.54 19.1 7.9 0.02