Skip to main content
editorial
. 2020 Aug 13;56(2):2002108. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02108-2020

TABLE 1.

COPD and smoking prevalence in coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Study [ref.] Location Subjects n Age# Female Type of patient Smoking rate COPD rate COPD prevalence by outcome p-value
Guan [8] China 1099 47.0 41.9% Hospitalised and outpatients Current 12.6%; former 1.9% 1.1% Severe 3.5% NA
Non-severe 0.6%
Met primary endpoint 10.4% NA
Did not meet primary endpoint 0.5%
Wang [10] China 138 56 45.7% Hospitalised NA 2.9% ICU 8.3% 0.054
Non-ICU 1.0%
Zhou [11] China 191 56.0 38% Hospitalised Current 6% 3% Survivor 7% 0.047
Non-survivor 1%
Huang [12] China 41 49.0 27% Hospitalised Current 7% 2% ICU 8% 0.14
Non-ICU 0
Guan [13] China 1590 48.9 42.7% Hospitalised Current and former 7% 1.5% Severe 62.5% NA
Non-severe 15.3%
ICU 29%
Non-ICU 5.9%
Mechanical ventilation 20.8%
No mechanical ventilation 2.9%
Survivor 25%
Non-survivor 2.8%
Zhang [14] China 140 57 49.3% Hospitalised Current 1.4%; former 5.0% 1.4% Severe 3.4% 0.170
Non-severe 0
Liu [15] China 78 38 50.0% Hospitalised Current and former 6.4% 10% Progression 9.1% 0.264
Improvement 1.5%
Feng [16] China 476 53 43.1% Hospitalised 9.7%+ 4.6% Critical 15.7% <0.001
Severe 5.6%
Moderate 2.3%
Li [17] China 548 60 49.1% Hospitalised Current 7.5%; former 9.4% 3.1% Severe 4.8% 0.026
Non-severe 1.4%
Wang [18] China 85 59.4 47.1% Hospitalised NA 5.9% Severe 10.3% 0.265
Non-severe 2.2%
Yan [19] China 1004 62§; 68ƒ 50.9% Hospitalised 46.0%+ 0.8% Survivors 0.8% 0.563
Non-survivors 0
Xiong [20] China 421 52 49.2% Hospitalised NA 4.3% Severe 1.7% 0.478
Recovered 4.7%
Lv [21] China 354 62 50.56% Hospitalised NA 1.69% Critical 1.19% NA
Severe 1.94%
Mild 1.74%
Zheng [90] China 34 66 32.4% ICU NA 5.9% Intubated 6.7% 1.00
Non-intubated 5.3%
Cai [22] China 383 61##; 44.5¶¶ 36.3%##; 57.2%¶¶ Hospitalised NA 8.4% Severe 14.3% 0.03
Non-severe 6.51%
Chen [23] China 548 56.0 42.9% Hospitalised Ever 5.8% 1.3% Survivors 0.4% NA
Non-survivors 4.9%
Shi [24] China 671 63 52% Hospitalised NA 3.4% Survivors 3.4% 1.00
Non-survivors 3.2%
Zou [25] China 154 60.68 56.49% Hospitalised 8.44%+ 5.84% Survivors 2.94% 0.074
Non-survivors 11.54%
Hu [26] China 323 61 48.6% Hospitalised 11.8%+ 1.9% Critical 3.8% 0.033
Severe 3.4%
Non-severe 0
Zhang [27] China 111 38.0 65% Hospitalised NA 2.7% Deterioration 5.6% 0.415
Discharge 2.2%
Chu [91] China 33 65.2 33.3% ICU NA 3.0% ECMO 14.3% 0.21
No ECMO 0
Wang [28] China 107 51.0 46.7% Hospitalised NA 2.8% Survivors 2.3% 0.447
Non-survivors 5.3%
Lagi [46] Italy 84 62 34.5% Hospitalised Current 7.1%; former 22.6% 5.6% ICU 18.8% 0.045
Non-ICU hospitalisation 2.9%
Tomlins [92] UK 95 75 37% Hospitalised NA 11% Survivors 8% 0.2
Non-survivors 20%
Israelsen [93] Denmark 175 71 51.4% Hospitalised Ever 55.8%
Never 44.2%
6.3% ICU 7.4% 1.00
Non-ICU hospitalisation 6.1%
Auld [94] Atlanta, GA, USA 217 64 45.2% ICU NA 9.7% Survivors 9.5% 0.737
Non-survivors 8.1%
Buckner [95] Seattle, WA, USA 105 69 50% Hospitalised Ever 26% 10% Severe 14% NA
Non-severe 7%
Javanian [96] Iran 100 60.12 49% Hospitalised NA 12% Survivors 8.64% 0.032
Non-survivors 26.31%
Itelman [97] Israel 162 52 35.2 Hospitalised 8.9%+ 1.2% Severe 3.8% 0.364
Moderate 0
Mild 1.1%
Lian [29] China 788 68 57.4% Hospitalised Current 5.88% 2.2% NA
Liu [30] China 137 57 55.5% Hospitalised NA 1.5% NA
Wu [31] China 80 44 48% Hospitalised NA 4% NA
Xu [32] China 90 50 57% Hospitalised NA 1% NA
Zhu [33] China 32 46 53% Emergency room 19%+ 6% NA
Huang [34] China 34 56.2 58.8% Hospitalised NA 8.8% NA
Wang [9] China 63 39.3 46% Asymptomatic NA 1.6% NA
Zhang [35] China 326 51 47.54% Hospitalised NA 0.61% NA
Liu [36] China 238 55.0 42.0% Hospitalised NA 1.3% NA
Lian [37] China 465 45 47.7% Hospitalised NA 0 NA
Hong [38] China 75 46.37 45% Hospitalised NA 0 NA
Ji [39] China 101 51.0 52% Hospitalised 5%+ 2% NA
Qiu [40] China 104 43 52.88% Hospitalised 3.85%+ 0.96% NA
Wei [41] China 101 49 46.5% Hospitalised 7.9%+ 1.0% NA
Grasselli [49] Italy 1591 63 19% ICU NA 4% NA
Cecconi [47] Italy 239 63.9 29.3% Hospitalised NA 9.2% NA
Inciardi [48] Italy 99 67 19% Hospitalised 20%+ 9% NA
de Abajo [98] Spain 1139 69.1 39.0% Hospitalised NA 10.5% NA
Barrasa [51] Spain 48 63.2 43% ICU 19%+ 38% NA
Szekely [99] Israel 100 66.1 37% Hospitalised 8%+ 4% NA
Richardson [42] NYC 5700 63 39.7% Hospitalised 15.6%+ 5.4% NA
Goyal [43] NYC 393 62.2 39.4% Hospitalised NA 5.1% NA
Kuno [44] NYC 8438 59 46.1% Hospitalised and outpatients NA 2.4% NA
Palaiodimos [45] NYC 200 64 51% Hospitalised Current and former 32.5% 14.0% NA
Arentz [52] Washington state, USA 21 70 48% ICU NA 33.3% NA
Bhatraju [50] Seattle, WA, USA 24 64 38% ICU NA 4% NA
Price-Haywood [100] Louisiana, USA 3481 55.5++; 53.6§§ 60% Hospitalised and outpatients NA 2.3% NA
Ferguson [101] California, USA 72 60.4 47.2% Hospitalised Ever 27.4% 4.2% NA
Gold [102] Georgia, USA 305 60 50.5% Hospitalised Current 5.2% 5.2% NA
Rentsch (preprint) [103] USA 585 66.1 4.6% Hospitalised and outpatients Current 27.2%; former 30.6%; never 36.9% 15.4% NA
Mitra [104] Canada 117 69 32.5% ICU Current and former 13.7% 6.8% NA

NYC: New York City, NY, USA. #: median or mean ages, years; : ICU, mechanical ventilation or death; +: smoking status (i.e. current or former) not specified; §: age for survivors; ƒ: age for non-survivors; ##: severe cases; ¶¶: non-severe cases; ++: age for white patients; §§: age for black patients. NA: not available.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure