Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;7(5):1431–1445. doi: 10.1002/nop2.514

TABLE 4.

The post‐test levels of metacognition among the study participants (N = 401)

Variables Yes No X2
n(%) n(%) p‐value
Intervention
FPBE 112(83.6) 22(16.4) 5.969
NFPBE 123(46.1) 144(53.9) 0.017
Total 235(58.6) 166(41.4)

The post‐test levels of metacognition among the study participants: Table4  indicates that out of 401 study participants, 58.6% (N = 235) had a higher level of metacognition. However, 83.6% (N = 112) of the study participants in an intervention group had adequate metacognition against their counterparts in the control group (46.1%; N = 123). The difference in metacognition levels among the study participants was observed to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Source: Field Data (2019).