Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;7(5):1544–1550. doi: 10.1002/nop2.536

TABLE 2.

Frequency of postgraduate student responses to teaching design and content questions [score and number (%)]

Item Scores Number (%)
Strongly agree Agree Uncertain Disagree Strongly disagree 2 p
Course learning requirements clearly (including teaching objectives and assessment methods) 4.64 ± 0.48 11 (61.1) 6 (33.3) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 23.64 <.001
High quality textbooks or handouts (including rich references and bibliography) 4.79 ± 0.49 14 (77.8) 3 (16.7) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 19.65 <.001
Moderated teaching information, combined theory, and practice 4.31 ± 0.82 8 (44.4) 8 (44.4) 1 (5.6) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 10.22 .007
Seize the latest international tendency of gerontologic nursing 4.58 ± 0.50 10 (55.6) 7 (38.8) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 24.31 <.001
Thinking clearly, teaching vividly, and stimulating interest 4.62 ± 0.60 12 (66.7) 5 (27.7) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 22.64 <.001
To expound academic thought and research methods precisely 4.53 ± 0.59 10 (55.6) 7 (38.8) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 24.31 <.001
Enlightening teaching and encouraging students to think independently and innovatively 4.58 ± 0.61 11 (61.1) 6 (33.3) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 23.64 <.001
Diversified teaching form and methods, and improved effective teaching 4.65 ± 0.48 11 (61.1) 6 (33.3) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 23.64 <.001
Helpful for students to improve their fund of knowledge and scientific research 4.24 ± 0.65 6 (33.3) 10 (55.6) 2 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 24.66 <.001