Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;8(7):e17480. doi: 10.2196/17480

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of image quality between smartphone and conventional fundus imaging. Image quality in terms of sharpness (left; semiquantitative scale from 1 to 5 as previously reported [22]), reflex artifacts (middle; scale from 0 to 3; 3=reflex artifacts in <10% of the field of view; 2=reflex artifacts in >10% of the field of view; 1=reflex artifacts in >30% of the field of view; 0=reflex artifacts in >50% of the field of view), and contrast and illumination (right; scale from 1 to 3; 3=all vessels contrast well against fundus pigmentation; 2=most vessels contrast against fundus pigmentation; 1=only few retinal vessels visible) is shown for smartphone-based fundus imaging and conventional fundus imaging.