Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;20:95. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00494-z

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic features of the DCIS, mIDC, and IDC lesions in the study cohort

DCIS (n = 112) mIDC (n = 50) IDC (n = 44) P value
Age, years 48.6 ± 10.3 50.3 ± 11.5 52.1 ± 10.8 0.181
Biopsy method 0.028
 SVAB 28 (25.0) 6 (12.0) 4 (9.1)
 US-CNB 84 (75.0) 44 (88.0) 40 (90.9)
Surgery type < 0.001
 Breast conserving 80 (71.4) 29 (58.0) 15 (34.1)
 Mastectomy 32 (28.6) 21 (42.0) 29 (65.9)
Nuclear grade 0.001
 1 15 (13.4) 4 (8.0) 1 (2.3)
 2 88 (78.6) 30 (60.0) 29 (65.9)
 3 9 (8.0) 16 (32.0) 14 (31.8)
Necrosis 0.073
 Present 54 (47.4) 33 (66.0) 27 (61.4)
 Absent 58 (51.8) 17 (34.0) 17 (38.6)
Pathologic tumor size (cm) 2.0 ± 1.6 3.7 ± 2.3 4.5 ± 2.4 < 0.001
Estrogen receptor < 0.001
 Positive 103 (92.0) 26 (52.0) 34 (77.3)
 Negative 9 (8.0) 24 (48.0) 10 (22.7)
Progesterone receptor < 0.001
 Positive 95 (84.8) 21 (42.0) 26 (59.1)
 Negative 17 (15.2) 29 (58.0) 18 (40.9)
HER2 < 0.001
 Positive 20 (17.9) 30 (60.0) 16 (36.4)
 Negative 92 (82.1) 20 (40.0) 28 (63.6)
Ki-67 < 0.001
 High (≥20%) 24 (21.4) 24 (48.0) 24 (54.5)
 Low (< 20%) 88 (78.6) 26 (52.0) 20 (45.5)

Data values indicate the number of patients (with percentages in parentheses), or the mean ± standard deviation.

DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ; mIDC microinvasive ductal carcinoma; IDC invasive ductal carcinoma; SVAB stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy; US-CNB US-guided core needle biopsy; HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2