Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;6(2):e001263. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001263

Table 6.

Efficacy of different therapeutic agents in refractory/non-responding or flaring LN

Reference Type of study n Intervention Control Endpoint Results Risk of bias*
CY
Anutrakulchai et al 91 RCT CY:32
EC-MPS: 27
CY + P EC-MPS + P 12 m CR, PR, TF CR+PR: CY vs EC-MPS 68% vs 71%, p = ns
TF: CY vs EC-MPS 46.9% vs 37%, p = ns
Premature termination due to high rate of serious adverse events in CY arm
High
Moroni et al 92 Observational CY:14 RTX:10 PO CY + P RTX + P 3y CR CR: CY vs RTX 92% vs 80% 7
Multitarget
Choi et al 93 Observational 29 MMF + TAC + P - 12 m CR, PR CR: 25.9%
PR: 29.6%
4
Mok et al 94 Observational 21 MMF + TAC + P - 12 m CR, PR CR+PR: 67% 5
Kasitanon et al 95 Observational 21 MMF + CsA + P add-on to IS - 12 m CR, PR CR: 33.3%
PR: 38.1%
5
RTX
Zhang et al 96 RCT 84 (1:1) CY + RTX + P CY + P 12 m CR, PR CR+ PR: CY vs RTX+CY 57.1% vs 83.3% p < 0.05 High
Kotagiri et al 97 Observational 14 RTX + p add-on to IS - 18 m CR, PR, Relapse CR+PR: 79%
Relapse: 45%
4
Davies et al 98 Observational 18 RTX + CY + P - 12 m CR, PR, Relapse CR+PR: 72%
Relapse: 39%
5
Jonsdottir et al 99 Observational 25 RTX + CY + P - 36 m CR, PR, Relapse CR: 64%
PR: 88%
Relapse: 24%
6
Iaccarino et al 100 Observational 68 RTX + P± CY - 12 m CR, PR, Relapse CR+PR: 94.1%
Relapse: 29.4%
6
Contis et al 101 Observational 17 RTX + P - 52 w CR, PR CR+PR: 53% 4
MMF
Rivera et al 102 Observational 85 MMF + P - 60 m CR, PR, Relapse CR: 27%
PR: 60%
Relapse: 15.7%
5

*Overall risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB2) for RCT and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies.

CY, cyclophosphamide; CR, complete response; CsA, ciclosporin A; EC-MPS, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; IS, immunosuppressant; m, months; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; P, prednisone; PR, partial response; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RTX, rituximab; TF, treatment failure; TAC, tacrolimus; w, weeks; y, years.