Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;2(1):fcaa023. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa023

Table 1.

Mean (SD) case processing times, diagnostic accuracy, confidence, difficulty and effort ratings for the case validation pilot study and the final fMRI study separated for Type 1 and Type 2 cases

Case pilot validation study
fMRI study
Type 1 cases, mean (SD) Type 2 cases, mean (SD) Type 2 − Type 1, t-value (df = 16) Type 1 cases, mean (SD) Type 2 cases, mean (SD) Type 2 − Type 1, t-value (df = 15)
Case processing time (s) 39 (14) 55 (17) 2.88a 21.6 (6.2) 26.3 (9.0) 4.74b
Diagnostic accuracy 1.87 (0.12) 1.64 (0.12) −5.05b 1.81 (0.16) 1.61 (0.26) −2.72a
Confidence 80 (7) 69 (9) −4.70b 81 (11) 70 (14) −2.81a
Difficulty 32 (15) 46 (15) 2.30a 26 (12) 40 (15) 4.74b
Effort 32 (13) 45 (14) 2.51a NAc NAc NAc

Notes: The data for the case pilot validation study include five cases that were not selected for the final fMRI study. Diagnostic accuracy was scored as 0 (incorrect diagnosis), 1 (partially correct diagnosis) or 2 (correct diagnosis). Confidence and difficulty were provided on a Likert-type scale from 1 (not at all confident/difficult) to 7 (very confident/difficult) in the fMRI experiment and transformed to a percentage for this table.

a

Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 cases is significant at P < 0.05.

b

Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 cases is significant at P < 0.001.

cNA: not available.