Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Jul 2;116:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105218

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Associations between parenting stress, responsiveness, and child PPVT. Mothers’ and fathers’ pathways are constrained.

Dotted lines indicate pathways where p > .05.

Note: Coefficients are standardized. Mothers’ and fathers’ pathways are constrained to be equal. Model controls for parental depression, race, education, age, number of biological children, child sex, treatment group, income-to-poverty ratio, marital status, and residential status.

N = 812 *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001

CFI: 1.00, RMSEA: 0.02; SRMR: 0.00. Indirect effect, mothers and fathers: b = −0.34, SE = 0.14, p = .017, bootstrapped 95% CI: [−0.62, −0.06]