Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237112

Table 2. Target outcomes reported by individual studies.

Treatment arm Trials (Author and year)
de Gier et al., 2016 Al-Mekhlafi et al., 2014 Ebenezer et al., 2013 Nchitoet al., 2009 Olsen’, Nawiri’ and Friis, 2000 Olsen et al, 2003
Length of follow-up (months) 7 6 6 10 12 11
Prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides Infection (95%CI) Intervention arm - 76.8 (61.5–79.1) 14.3 42.6 / 47.5 / 47.4 45 (35–55) 13.1 (9.6–16.6)
Control arm - 73.1 (60.0–77.5) 24.5 46.0 44 (33–55) 13.4 (9.9–16.9)
Prevalence of Trichuris trichiura Infection (95%CI) Intervention arm - 65.8(53.1–68.7) 4.9 - 30 (22–38) 18.1 (13.5–22.7)
Control arm - 66.5 (55.8–70.1) 8.5 - 35 (26–44) 20.2 (15.5–24.9)
Prevalence of hookworm infection (95% CI) Intervention arm 21.2 56.4 (30.8–69.1) 8.0 - 35(25–45) 19.9 (15.2–24.6)
Control arm 11.9 51.9 (30.5–65.0 8.7 - 36(26–46) 17.6 (13.3–21.9)
Infection Intensity of Ascaris lumbricoides Intervention arm - 14,867 (5,246)2 85.73 2628/ 1902/ 31104 3745 (94–10 990)5 2.2 (1.7–2.7)
Control arm - 13,368 (6,367)2 75.53 26464 5905 (95–15 958)5 2.4 (1.9–3.0)
Infection Intensity of Trichuris trichiura Intervention arm - 2,859 (799)2 95.13 - 38 (18–104)5 2.0 (1.6–2.3)
Control arm - 3,678 (562)2 91.53 - 30 (13–108)5 1.9 (1.6–2.2)
Infection Intensity of hookworm1 Intervention arm - 14(11)2 92.03 - 40 (10–110)3 1.9 (1.6–2.3)
Control arm - 11(8)2 91.33 - 45 (15–80)5 1.9 (1.6–2.2)
Weight (kg) Intervention arm - - - - - -
Control arm - - - - - -
Mid Upper Arm Circumference for age (MUAC-for-age) Intervention arm - - - - - -
Control arm - - - - - -
School attendance Intervention arm - - 61.5 - - -
Control arm - - 61.0 - - -
School Productivity Intervention arm - - 49.6(27.1)2 General math test; 55.1(25.9)2 General Tamil test - - -
Control arm - - 48.9(27.5)2 General math test; 56.2(27.1)2 General Tamil test - - -

All outcomes are presented as reported in the original study.

NA = Not Assessed

Prevalence of all STH species Infection reported as percentages rates with 95%CI unless stated otherwise.

Percentage prevalence of infection (SD1)

Mean (SD2)

Percentage infection intensity (the author did not report any summary statistic3)

Mean eggs per gram of faeces (the author did not report any summary statistic4)

Mean eggs per gram of faeces (interquartile range5)