Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 26;2:7. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2018.554037

Table 2D.

LFME Preceptor Survey Constructs, Comparison of Preceptor and Student Responses—Perceived Effects of LFME

Variable Preceptor Mean (SD)
Range 1–7
Student Mean (SD)
Range: 1–7
Group Comparison
Perceived Effects of LFME (M=6.05; SD=0.65; Cronbach’s alpha 0.90)
In general, I am satisfied with the quality of the LFME course. 6.01 (1.02) 5.87 (1.36) P=.376
The LFME was an appropriate and valuable educational experience for students. 6.27 (0.99) 6.39 (1.02) P=.389
I would recommend the LFME course to other family physicians (or other medical schools). 6.14 (1.03) 6.42 (1.01) P=.043
The LFME taught students the importance of good communication and multidisciplinary teamwork. 6.04 (0.87) 5.76 (1.29) P=.061
The knowledge and skills students learn through the LFME are relevant for a future career in medicine. 6.40 (0.75) 6.34 (0.95) P=.648
The LFME improved students’ ability to communicate with patients. 5.91 (0.93) 5.64 (1.31) P=.086
The LFME helped students develop greater empathy towards patients. 5.95 (0.97) 5.52 (1.42) F=6.75
P=.010
The LFME helped students develop social accountability (ie, the desire to serve their community and make a difference in people’s lives). 5.32 (0.99) 5.26 (1.48) P=.720
The LFME gave students a better understanding of the work performed by family doctors. 6.59 (0.63) 6.14 (1.17) F=11.80
P=.001
As a result of the LFME I think more students will be interested in pursuing a career in family medicine. 5.71 (1.00) 3.98 (2.05) F=58.87
P=.000
The LFME helped students feel more prepared for clerkship and future patient encounters. 6.16 (0.87) 5.55 (1.38) F=14.50
P=.000

Note: A 7-point Likert scale was used where 1=strongly disagree, 2=moderately disagree, 3=mildly disagree, 4=neutral, 5=mildly agree, 6=moderately agree, and 7=strongly agree.