Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar 4;52(3):864–872. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27115

Table 2.

Pairwise Comparisons of Macromolecular Fraction (MMF) Between Groups for Each Corresponding Region.

Group Region MMF Mean Difference, [95% Confidence Interval] (%) p-value MMF Difference1 (%)
Control - Symptomatic All segments 0.87, [0.09 – 1.84] 0.027 6.39
Control - Asymptomatic All segments 1.18, [0.20 – 2.63] 0.024 8.76
Asymptomatic - Symptomatic All segments −0.31, [−1.27 – 0.70] 0.540 2.38

Control - Symptomatic Lateral segments 1.23, [−0.10 – 2.58] 0.027 8.23
Control - Asymptomatic Lateral segments 1.31, [0.06 – 2.45] 0.040 8.79
Asymptomatic - Symptomatic Lateral segments −0.08, [−1.40 – 1.12] 0.870 0.56

Control - Symptomatic Bursal-sided segments 0.43, [−0.43 – 1.67] 0.280 6.39
Control - Asymptomatic Bursal-sided segments 1.01, [0 – 2.02] 0.044 3.33
Asymptomatic - Symptomatic Bursal-sided segments −0.58, [−1.53 – 0.74] 0.420 7.92

Control - Symptomatic Articular-sided segments 1.31, [0.54 – 2.23] 0.001 9.14
Control - Asymptomatic Articular-sided segments 1.35, [0.07 – 2.44] 0.037 9.44
Asymptomatic - Symptomatic Articular-sided segments −0.04, [−0.99 – 1.23] 0.950 0.30
1

Percent difference = |group 1 – group 2| / [(group 1 + group 2) / 2]