Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;24(3):893–904. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01915-2

Table 3.

Masticatory muscle activity (MMA), orofacial activity (OFA), and other muscle activity (OMA) indices and statistical comparison to polysomnography (PSG) with audio and video

Variable All events Sleep-time events only
MMA index
  1 channel EMG 6.6 [4.0–10.3]*** 3.0 [1.6–6.3]***
  2 channels EMG 5.3 [3.6–8.0]*** 2.2 [1.3–5.1]***
  3 out of 4 channels EMG 5.4 [3.7–7.7]*** 1.9 [1.5–4.8]***
  PSG, no audio or video (PSG-N) 1.1 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.2
  FES with audio (FES-A) 1.1 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.2
  PSG with audio (PSG-A) 0.9 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.3
  PSG with audio and video (PSG-AV) 0.9 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.3
OFA index
  PSG, no audio or video (PSG-N) 0 [0–0.3]*** 0 [0–0.3]***
  FES with audio (FES-A) 1.2 [0.6–2.0]*** 0.4 [0.1–0.8]**
  PSG with audio (PSG-A) 1.1 [0.6–2.3]** 0.5 [0.1–1.3]**
  PSG with audio and video (PSG-AV) 2.0 [1.1–4.6] 1.2 [0.4–3.1]
OMA index
  PSG, no audio or video (PSG-N) 6.0 [4.7–9.5]*** 3.2 [1.6–5.0]***
  FES with audio (FES-A) 6.7 [4.2–12.1]** 3.5 [2.0–8.7]*
  PSG with audio (PSG-A) 8.2 [4.3–11.6]** 4.1 [1.6–6.7]***
  PSG with audio and video (PSG-AV) 8.1 [5.0–12.4] 5 [2.2–8.0]

Data presented as median [25th percentile–75th percentile] (for non-normally distributed variables) or mean ± standard deviation (for normally distributed variables)

MMA masticatory muscle activity, EMG electromyography, PSG polysomnography, FES frontal electrode set, OFA orofacial activity, OMA other muscle activity

*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, comparison to PSG with audio and video)

p ≤ 0.05 (paired samples t test, comparison to PSG with audio and video)