Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;10:13692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70626-6

Table 1.

Comparison of basic data between the two groups.

Classification Modular group Nonmodular group P values
Age (years) 69.1 ± 7.5 (49–82) 67.6 ± 7.9 (50–83) 0.100
Gender (female/male) 48/60 50/60 0.136
BMI (kg/m2) 26.1 ± 2.8(19.15–32.30) 25.9 ± 2.5(20.74–31.99) 0.833
Initial replacement to repair time (months) 12.6 ± 6.0 (1–27) 11.0 ± 6.7 (0.08–25) 0.057
Reasons for revision (n) 0.583
Aseptic loosening 96 95
Periprosthetic fractures 6 5
Dislocation 6 10
Paprosky femoral defect (n) 0.347
I 18 20
II 54 60
IIIA 24 25
IIIB 12 5
ASA classification (n) 0.168
I 6 10
II 90 80
III 12 20
Combined acetabular revision(n) 96 105 0.071
VAS score (score) 7.6 ± 1.3 (6–10) 7.5 ± 1.1 (6–10) 0.839
Harris score (score) 40.5 ± 6.1 (29–52) 40.1 ± 6.6 (27–52) 0.774
Preoperative limb length discrepancy (mm) 18.7 ± 6.6 (5–33) 20.3 ± 6.1 (5–32) 0.071