Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2019 Jun 4;28(8):955–970. doi: 10.1002/hec.3885

Table 2.

Regression Results, Outcomes from Strenghts & Difficulties Questionnaire Scale

Panel A. State Unemployment Rate
Mental Health Severity (0–10) Likely Psychological Problem (0/1)

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Marginal Effect 0.0263* 0.0434** 0.0030** 0.0037***
(SE) (0.0132) (0.0163) (0.0012) (0.0014)
Mean, Dep. Var. 1.71 1.71 0.041 0.041
Relative Effect of 1.51 Percentage Point Drop in Unemployment Rate −2.3% −3.8% −11.0% −13.6%
Area-specific linear time trends No Yes No Yes

Panel B. State Housing Price Index
Mental Health Severity (0–10) Likely Psychological Problem (0/1)

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Marginal Effect −0.179** −0.185** −0.014** −0.014*
(SE) (0.068) (0.084) (0.006) (0.007)
Mean, Dep. Var. 1.71 1.71 0.041 0.041
Relative Effect of 0.19 Point Rise in Housing Price Index −2.0% −2.1% −6.4% −6.4%
Area-specific linear time trends No Yes No Yes

Sample size 94,229 94,229 94,229 94,229

Note: Results are from OLS (Columns 1–2) and probit (Columns 3–4) models with robust standard errors clustered on the state. A fall in unemployment rate of 1.51 percentage points and a rise in HPI of 0.19 represent one standard deviation improvements in economic conditions. Covariates include age, sex, race/ethnicity, parental education, parental age, and parental marital status. Models include a full set of state fixed effects and time fixed effects.

*

p-value <.10

**

p-value<.05

***

p-value<.01.