Table 2.
Panel A. State Unemployment Rate | ||||
Mental Health Severity (0–10) | Likely Psychological Problem (0/1) | |||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Marginal Effect | 0.0263* | 0.0434** | 0.0030** | 0.0037*** |
(SE) | (0.0132) | (0.0163) | (0.0012) | (0.0014) |
Mean, Dep. Var. | 1.71 | 1.71 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
Relative Effect of 1.51 Percentage Point Drop in Unemployment Rate | −2.3% | −3.8% | −11.0% | −13.6% |
Area-specific linear time trends | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Panel B. State Housing Price Index | ||||
Mental Health Severity (0–10) | Likely Psychological Problem (0/1) | |||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Marginal Effect | −0.179** | −0.185** | −0.014** | −0.014* |
(SE) | (0.068) | (0.084) | (0.006) | (0.007) |
Mean, Dep. Var. | 1.71 | 1.71 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
Relative Effect of 0.19 Point Rise in Housing Price Index | −2.0% | −2.1% | −6.4% | −6.4% |
Area-specific linear time trends | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Sample size | 94,229 | 94,229 | 94,229 | 94,229 |
Note: Results are from OLS (Columns 1–2) and probit (Columns 3–4) models with robust standard errors clustered on the state. A fall in unemployment rate of 1.51 percentage points and a rise in HPI of 0.19 represent one standard deviation improvements in economic conditions. Covariates include age, sex, race/ethnicity, parental education, parental age, and parental marital status. Models include a full set of state fixed effects and time fixed effects.
p-value <.10
p-value<.05
p-value<.01.