Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;110(9):e1–e14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305774

TABLE 1—

Prevalence of Any, Physical, or Sexual Intimate Partner Violence Victimization by Recall Period Among Transgender Individuals

Article Recall Period Gender Any IPV, % (No./Total No.) Physical IPV, % (No./Total No.) Sexual IPV, % (No./Total No.)
Lifetime
Bazargan and Galvan44 Lifetime AMAB TG 56.8 (125/220) NA NA
Castro et al.33,a Lifetime AMAB TG 26.7 (8/30) NA NA
De Boni et al.34,a Lifetime AMAB TG 41.7 (10/24) 37.5 (9/24) NA
DeVylder et al.80,a Lifetime TG (NS) 83.3 (5/6) 66.7 (4/6) 66.7 (4/6)
Fernández-Rouco et al.22 Lifetime, aged > 14 y AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA NA 5.0 (6/120)
FORGE38 Lifetime AMAB TG Dating violence: 5.8 (8/138) NA NA
IPV/DV: 29.0 (40/138)
FORGE38 Lifetime AFAB TG Dating violence: 23.3 (47/202) NA NA
IPV/DV: 36.1 (73/202)
FORGE38 Lifetime TG (NS) Dating violence: 31.9 (29/91) NA NA
IPV/DV: 38.5 (35/91)
Garthe et al.64 Lifetime AMAB TG 41.7 (78/187) NA 16.0 (30/187)
Goldenberg et al.65 Lifetime AMAB TG 43.6 (34/78) NA NA
Goldenberg et al.65 Lifetime AFAB TG 30.4 (7/23) NA NA
Goldenberg et al.65 Lifetime NB 60.0 (18/30) NA NA
Henry et al.66,a Lifetime AMAB TG 72.4 (21/29) 34.5 (10/29) 17.2 (5/29)
Henry et al.66,a Lifetime AFAB TG 76.9 (20/26) 61.5 (16/26) 46.2 (12/26)
Henry et al.66,a Lifetime NB 65.2 (15/23) 30.4 (7/23) 34.8 (8/23)
Holt42,a Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA 16.2 (55/340) NA
Holt43,a Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA 14.8 (26/176) NA
James et al.15 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG, NB 53.1 (14217/26 780) 34.4 (9333/27 166) 19.3 (5316/27 557)
Kattari et al.50 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG, NB 37.8 (2438/6456)b NA NA
Keuroghlian et al.51,c Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 33.1 (150/452) NA NA
Logie et al.11,a Lifetime AMAB TG 37.5 (51/136) NA NA
Logie et al.28 Lifetime TG (NS) 10.0 (1/10) NA NA
Langenderfer-Magruder et al.52 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 31.1 (38/122) NA NA
Martinez-Velez et al.67 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG, TG (NS) 55.8 (29/52) NA NA
McDowell et al.78,d Lifetime AFAB TG 66.4 (99/149) NA NA
Mimiaga et al.68 Lifetime AMAB TG 41.7 (78/187) NA NA
Nemoto et al.58 Lifetime AMAB TG NA 22.0 (125/568) NA
Peitzmeier et al.87,d Lifetime AFAB TG NA 39.5 (58/147) 51.0 (75/147)
Pitts et al.23 Lifetime AMAB TG 36.4 (24/66) 16.7 (11/66) 3.0 (2/66)
Pitts et al.23 Lifetime AFAB TG 61.8 (21/34) 26.5 (9/34) 8.8 (3/34)
Qureshi et al.56 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 6.3 (2/32) NA NA
Reisner et al.85 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 25.8 (8/31) NA NA
Reisner et al.91,c Lifetime AFAB TG 41.0 (71/173) NA NA
Risser et al.57 Lifetime AMAB TG NA 50 (34/67)e 25 (17/67)e
Roch et al.9 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 80.0 (48/60) 45.0 (27/60) 46.7(28/60)
Salazar et al.58 Lifetime AMAB TG NA 55.4 (51/92) NA
Swan et al.37,a Lifetime AMAB TG NA 37.5 (3/8) 50.0 (4/8)
Taliaferro et al.74,a Lifetime AMAB TG 22.9 (134/585) 10.4 (61/587) 13.0 (76/585)
Taliaferro et al.74,a Lifetime AFAB TG 30.1 (410/1362) 10.5 (143/1362) 18.2 (249/1368)
Turell60 Lifetime AMAB TG NA 42.9 (3/7) 28.6 (2/7)
Veale et al.26 Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 27.0 (203/751)e NA NA
White Hughto et al.90,c Lifetime AMAB TG, AFAB TG 33.3 (137/412) NA NA
Wilton et al.76,a Lifetime AMAB TG 15.4 (2/13) NA NA
Yamanis et al.77,a Lifetime AMAB TG 50.0 (19/38) 21.1 (8/38) 23.1 (9/39)
Zhang et al.7 Lifetime AMAB TG 65.6 (40/61) NA NA
Past year
Bukowski et al.92,f Past year AMAB TG NA 44.7 (220/492) NA
Clements-Nolle et al.46 Past year AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA 18.9 (36/190) NA
Griner et al.93,g Past year TG (NS) NA 10.3 (21/204) 10.8 (22/204)
Hoxmeier94 Past year AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA 3.8 (3/79) 6.3 (5/79)
Johns et al.82,h Past year TG (NS) NA 33.8 (593/1752) 29.1 (374/1287)
Langenderfer-Magruder et al.62,a Past year AMAB TG, AFAB TG 60 (9/15) NA NA
Mizuno et al.53 Past yeari AMAB TG 3.7 (7/166)b NA NA
Scheer et al.72,a Past year AMAB TG NA 15.6 (5/32) 9.4 (3/32)
Scheer et al.72,a Past year AFAB TG NA 19.0 (12/63) 15.9 (10/63)
Scheer et al.72,a Past year NB NA 16.1 (22/137) 13.1 (18/137)
Scheer et al.72,a Past year TG (NS) NA 16.1 (10/62) 11.3 (7/62)
Smith et al.59 Past year AMAB TG NA NA 3.2 (2/63)
Sterzing et al.73 Past year AMAB TG NA 11.8 (2/19)j NA
Sterzing et al.73 Past year AFAB TG NA 15.1 (7/47) NA
Sterzing et al.73 Past year AMAB NB NA 14.7 (7/52) NA
Sterzing et al.73 Past year AFAB NB NA 12.6 (24/189) NA
Valentine et al.6 Past year AMAB TG 12.1 (19/157) 8.9 (14/157) 7.6 (12/157)
Valentine et al.6 Past year AFAB TG 6.6 (11/167) 4.8 (8/167) 3.0 (5/167)
Valentine et al.6 Past year NB 8.2 (16/194) 5.2 (10/194) 5.2 (10/194)
Valentine et al.6 Past year TG (NS) 9.1 (18/197) 5.6 (11/197) 5.1 (10/197)
Walls et al.75 Past year AMAB TG NA 39.7 (25/63) NA
Walls et al.75 Past year AFAB TG NA 27.5 (28/102) NA
Walls et al.75 Past year NB NA 48.5 (32/66) NA
Whitfield et al.83,g Past year TG (NS) NA 10.0 (20/201) 10.4 (21/201)
Woulfe et al.17,a Past year TG (NS) NA 9.2 (13/142) 11.3 (16/142)
Zalla et al.36,a Past year AMAB TG NA 33.9 (37/109) NA
Other recall periods
Askevis-Leherpeux et al.29,a During an “index period” during which gender incongruence or distress may have been particularly prominent AMAB TG, AFAB TG 8.7 (6/69) NA NA
Bhochhibhoya et al.79,a By current or recent dating partner while in college TG (NS) NA NA 37.5 (3/8)
Campbell et al.31,a During an “index period” during which gender incongruence or distress may have been particularly prominent AMAB TG, AFAB TG 3.5 (2/57) NA NA
Cantor et al.40 Since enrollment (graduate students) AMAB TG, AFAB TG 17.8 (87/490) 8.6 (42/490) NA
Cantor et al.40 Since enrollment (undergraduates) AMAB TG, AFAB TG 22.8 (207/908) 9.7 (88/908) NA
Cantor et al.40 Since start of 2014 term (graduate students) AMAB TG, AFAB TG 10.2 (50/490) NA NA
Cantor et al.40 Since start of 2014 term (undergraduates) AMAB TG, AFAB TG 15.3 (139/908) NA NA
Dank et al.95 Ever with current or most recent partner AMAB TG, AFAB TG NA 88.9 (16/18) 61.1 (11/18)
Edwards et al.47,a Past 2 y NB NA 30.4 (7/23) NA
Edwards et al.47,a Past 2 y AMAB TG NA 50.0 (2/4) NA
Edwards et al.47,a Past 2 y AFAB TG NA 40.0 (4/10) NA
Fedina et al.81,a Since enrollment TG (NS) NA NA NA
Flentje et al.48 Current AFAB TG 30.8 (4/13) NA NA
Flentje et al.48 Current AMAB TG 13.6 (3/22) NA NA
Guadamuz et al.8 Other AMAB TG NA NA 4.2 (20/474)
Lane et al.30,a Past 6 mo AMAB TG 0 (0/6) NA NA
Logie et al.96 Adulthood AMAB TG 26.5 (36/137) NA NA
Nemoto et al.54 Ever, aged < 18 y AMAB TG NA NA 2.5 (14/564)
Nemoto et al.54 Adulthood AMAB TG NA NA 4.9 (28/568)
Odo and Hawelu55 Other AMAB TG 20.0 (20/100)k NA NA
Parsons et al.69 Past 5 y AMAB TG 65.1 (138/212) NA NA
Petering et al.70,a Past 3 mo AMAB TG NA 0 (0/3) NA
Reuter et al.88,l Up to 3 partners in the past 6 mo AMAB TG 66.7 (6/9) 44.4 (4/9) NA
Reuter et al.88,l Up to 3 partners in the past 6 mo AFAB TG 0 (0/7) 0 (0/7) NA
Robles et al.35,a During an “index period” during which gender incongruence or distress may have been particularly prominent AMAB TG, AFAB TG, NB 11.2 (28/250) NA NA
Sinha et al.32 Past 3 mo AMAB TG NA NA 5.6 (5/90)
Smith et al.59 Adolescence (aged 12–17 y) AMAB TG NA NA 3.2 (2/63)
Smith et al.59 Adulthood (aged ≥ 25 y) AMAB TG NA NA 9.5 (6/63)
Smith et al.59 Young adulthood (aged 18–24 y) AMAB TG NA NA 15.9 (10/63)
Spittal et al.24,a Other AMAB TG, AFAB TG 5.7 (5/88)b NA NA
Whitton et al.61,a,l Up to 3 partners in the past 6 mo at any of 6 study visits AMAB TG 66.7 (8/12) 50.0 (6/12) 50.0 (6/12)
Whitton et al.61,a,l Up to 3 partners in the past 6 mo at any of 6 study visits AFAB TG 50.0 (4/8) 50.0 (4/8) 25.0 (2/8)
Zakrison et al.97 Current AMAB TG, AFAB TG 100.0 (1/1) NA NA
Zhang et al.7,a Ever with current partner AMAB TG NA 31.0 (9/29) 61.9 (13/21)

Note. AFAB = assigned-female-at-birth; AMAB = assigned-male-at-birth; DV = domestic violence; IPV = intimate partner violence; NA = information not available; NB = nonbinary or genderqueer; SAB = sex assigned at birth; TG = transgender; TG (NS) = transgender (not specified)—transgender, but gender identity or SAB of participants not available. Articles with prevalence estimates for multiple recall periods or populations are reported on multiple rows. Samples of exclusively IPV survivors reporting prevalence of specific types of IPV (e.g., Heintz et al.49 and Scheer and Baams71) are not included as any IPV prevalence is 100%. “Any IPV” indicates either a single question that includes multiple types of IPV (e.g., “Has your partner hit you or forced you to have sex?”) or a summary measure of IPV across multiple types of IPV assessed in the study. Studies with AMAB TG or AFAB TG participants may include NB participants under those terms without necessarily assessing for nonbinary identity or providing disaggregated prevalence estimates for nonbinary participants. Gender is standardized across studies as AMAB TG, AFAB TG, or NB regardless of language the original study may have used around gender (e.g., “transmasculine individuals” or “transgender women”) for greater consistency.

a

Some prevalence data not published in article; authors provided data upon contact.

b

Prevalence defined as percentage of individuals who accessed a domestic violence service. Other articles that used the same data set (the National Transgender Discrimination Survey) were not reported again in this table.

c

Articles used the same data set.

d

Articles used the same data set.

e

Prevalence given in article, number/total number is approximate.

f

Bukowski et al.92 article with larger sample size represented in Table 1 because the other Bukowski et al.63 article uses a subsample from the same data set.

g

Articles use the same data set and, therefore, Whitfield et al.83 sample is not represented in the text of the results when summarizing findings around past-year prevalence, to avoid double-counting this study sample.

h

Weighted prevalence estimates reported by Johns et al.82 in the article were 26.4% for physical IPV and 22.9% for sexual IPV. Raw data were obtained from the authors.

i

Recall period vague in article.

j

Sterzing et al.73 used multiple imputation to report prevalence estimates. Numerators are approximated by applying the percentage to the reported sample size (denominator) and rounding.

k

“By informal count” “at least 20” of 100 transgender participants experienced IPV.

l

Articles used the same data set.