Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;110(9):1293–1299. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305757

TABLE 2—

Differences in the Percentage of Local Health Department Revenue Source by Time and Rurality: United States, 2010 and 2016

LHD Revenue Source 2010 (n = 1828), % 2016 (n = 1699), % Percentage Point Difference (2016–2010) DID
Local
 Urbana 36.7 45.7 9.0 Ref
 Large ruralb 28.3c 33.5c 5.2 3.80
 Small rurala 26.7c 35.6c 8.9 0.10
State
 Urbana 21.3 17.3 −4.0 Ref
 Large rural 19.5 22.2c 2.7 −6.70**
 Small rurala 23.3 19.9d −3.4 −0.60
Federal pass through
 Urbanb 21.3 18.6 −2.7 Ref
 Large rural 21.9 21.4d −0.5 −2.20
 Small rural 22.0 23.2c 1.2 −3.90*
Federal direct
 Urban 4.4 3.7 −0.7 Ref
 Large rurala 4.2 1.3c −2.9 2.20*
 Small rurala 3.8 1.3c −2.5 1.80
CMS
 Urbana 14.6 7.9 −6.7 Ref
 Large rurala 24.1c 15.7c −8.4 1.70
 Small rurala 24.5c 17.6c −6.9 0.20
Private foundation
 Urbanb 1.4 0.9 −0.5 Ref
 Large rural 2.0 1.2 −0.8 0.30
 Small rural 1.9 1.3 −0.6 0.10
Private insurance
 Urban 1.4 1.4 0.0 Ref
 Large ruralb 2.2d 3.3c 1.1 −1.10*
 Small rural 4.7c 4.5c −0.2 0.20
Patient fees
 Urbana 3.3 1.5 −1.8 Ref
 Large rural 4.5d 3.7c −0.8 −1.00
 Small rurala 5.1c 3.6c −1.5 −0.30
Nonclinical fees
 Urban 12.0 10.7 −1.3 Ref
 Large rural 9.1d 7.9d −1.2 −0.10
 Small rural 4.1c 3.9c −0.2 −1.10
Other
 Urbana 5.5 3.3 −2.2 Ref
 Large rurala 6.2 2.2 −4.0 1.80
 Small rural 5.7 4.2 −1.5 −0.70

Note. CMS = Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DID = differences in differences; LHD = local health department. Values derived from Stata MARGINS command following unadjusted regression model.

a

P < .01 change between 2010 and 2016.

b

P < .05 change between 2010 and 2016.

c

P < .01 compared with urban.

d

P < .05 compared with urban.

*

P < .05 DID; **P < .01 DID.