Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;11:1213. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01213

Table 1.

The effect of rootstock and crop load interaction on the return bloom of “Ligol” and “Auksis” apple trees (number of flower clusters tree−1).

Treatment “Ligol” “Auksis” Average
M.26 (75) 153.0 a* 142.3 bc 147.7 a
M.26 (113) 34.7 f 117.3 cde 76.0 f
M.26 (150) 16.3 g 109.3 de 62.8 h
M.9 (75) 101.3 c 176.0 a 138.7 ab
M.9 (113) 125.3 b 120.7 cde 123.0 cd
M.9 (150) 23.7 fg 108.7 de 66.2 gh
B.396 (75) 92.7 cd 98.7 e 95.7 de
B.396 (113) 62.0 e 98.7 e 80.3 f
B.396 (150) 58.7 e 93.7 e 76.2 fg
P 67 (75) 130.0 b 131.0 bc 130.5 bc
P 67 (113) 82.0 d 124.3 cd 103.2 de
P 67 (150) 60.0 e 116.3 de 88.2 ef
P 22 (75) 86.3 cd 151.0 ab 118.7 cd
P 22 (113) 55.7 e 116.3 cde 86.0 ef
P 22 (150) 21.7 fg 102.7 de 62.2 h
Effect of rootstock
M.26 68.0 b 123.0 b 95.5 b
M.9 83.4 a 135.1 a 109.3 a
B.396 71.1 b 97.0 c 84.1 c
P 67 90.7 a 123.9 b 107.3 a
P 22 54.6 c 123.3 b 88.9 bc
Effect of crop load
75 112.7 a 139.8 a 126.2 a
113 71.9 b 115.5 b 93.7 b
150 36.1 c 106.1 c 71.1 c

*The different letters on the same column indicate significant differences between treatments, rootstock and crop load separately. The analysis was conducted with all data resulting from 9 trees of “Ligol” and “Auksis” apple trees grafted on M.26, M.9, B.396, P 67, and P 22, with crop-load adjusted to 75, 113, and 150 fruits per tree. The data were processed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Turkey (HSD) multiple range test at the confidence level p = 0.05.