Table 1.
Hospital performance rankeda | No. of surveys completed | No. of group calls attended | Group or individual interview | Types of data collected | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detailed field notes | Transcribed audio recordings | ||||
Sites performing above the mean | |||||
1 | 13 | 14 | X | X | X |
2 | 12 | 11 | X | X | X |
3 | 11 | 12 | X | X | X |
4 | 3 | 0 | |||
5 | 7 | 10 | X | X | X |
6 | 0 | 0 | |||
Sites performing at the mean | |||||
7 | 4 | 5 | |||
8 | 7 | 11 | |||
Sites performing below the mean | |||||
9 | 6 | 6 | |||
10 | 11 | 10 | |||
11ab | 11 | 5 | X | X | |
11bb | 8 | 10 | X | X | |
12 | 5 | 4 | |||
13 | 12 | 14 | X | X | X |
14 | 9 | 1 | |||
15 | 5 | 0 | |||
16 | 10 | 13 | X | X | X |
17 | 10 | 8 | |||
18 | 8 | 5 | X | X | |
19 | 5 | 2 |
aPerformance was ranked based on per protocol completion of the intervention. Per protocol completion is defined as % of enrolled patients who attended the COMPASS-TC clinic visit within 30 calendar days of hospital discharge (Duncan et al., in press).
bThese sites were part of the same system and were combined in the primary outcome analyses.