Table 2.
Results of genetic diversities, AMOVAs and mismatch distribution for populations of Bulinus spp. in Lake Victoria
| Bulinus truncatus | Bulinus sp. 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (n = 29) | Lentic sand substrate (n = 14) | Lentic stone & rocks substrate (n = 8) | River systems (n = 7) | Mean (n = 31) | Islands (n = 5) | Swamp papyrus (n = 15) | Marshes water hyacinth (n = 11) | |
| Haplotype (h) | 22 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 17 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| Haplotype diversity (h) | 0.978 ± 0.005 | 0.956 ± 0.0156 | 1.000 ± 0.022 | 0.905 ± 0.040 | 0.940 ± 0.005 | 0.900 ± 0.016 | 0.895 ± 0.022 | 0.909 ± 0.041 |
| Nucleotide diversity (π) | 0.01067 | 0.01134 | 0.01014 | 0.08387 | 0.00753 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.084 |
| FST (P-value) | 0.034 (0.045) | 0.014 (0.297) | 0.048 (0.072) | 0.047 (0.027) | 0.064 (0.020) | 0.077 (0.081) | − 0.016 (0.432) | 0.080 (0.000) |
| Tajima’s D (P-value) | − 0.126 (0.484) | − 1.092 (0.144) | 0.096 (0.575) | 0.618 (0.733) | − 1.158 (0.112) | − 1.162 (0.058) | − 0.606 (0.279) | − 0.317 (0.414) |
| Fu’s FS (P-value) | − 1.735 (0.237) | − 2.549 (0.097) | − 3.273 (0.022) | 0.617 (0.585) | − 5.439 (0.014) | − 0.445 (0.277) | − 2.088 (0.149) | 0.644 (0.312) |
Note: The ordering of specimens was based on the habitats they were found