Table 1.
Key Papers Using High-Resolution Numerical Cloud Models with Bulk Microphysics Schemes to Study the Impact of Microphysical Schemes on Precipitationaa
| Study | Model | Microphysics | Resolution/Vertical Layers | Integration Time | Case(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin et al. [1983] | 2-D | 3ICE | 200 m/95 | 48 min | Montana hail event |
| Cotton et al. [1982,1986] | 2-D | 3ICE | 500 m/31 | 5h | Orographic snow |
| Rutledge and Hobbs [1984] | 2-D kinematic | 3ICE | 600 m/20 | Steady State | Narrow cold front |
| Lord et al. [1984]a | 2-D axisymmetric | 3ICE versus Warm Rain | 2 km/20 | 4.5 days | Idealized |
| Yoshizaki [1986]c | 2-D slab symmetric | 3ICE versus Warm Rain | 0.5 km/32 | 4.5 h | 12 September GATE squall line |
| Nicholls [1987] | 2-D slab symmetric | 3ICE versus Warm Rain | 0.5 km/25 | 5h | 12 September GATE squall line |
| Fovell and Ogura [1988]c,f | 2-D slab symmetric | 3ICE versus Warm Rain | 1 km/31 | 10 h | Midlatitude squall line |
| Tao and Simpson [1989,1993]c | 2-D and 3-D | 3ICE versus Warm Rain | 1 km/31 | 12 h | GATE squall line |
| Tao et al. [1993] | 2-D | 3ICE | 1 km/31 | 12 h | GATE squall line |
| McCumber et al. [1991]d,f | 2-D and 3-D | 3ICE (graupel versus hail, | 1 km/31 | 12 h | GATE squall line |
| Wu et al. [1999] | 2-D slab symmetric | 2ICE versus 3ICE) 2ICE | 3 km/52 | 39 days | TOGA COARE |
| Ferrier [1994]; Ferrier et al. [1995]c | 2-D slab symmetric | two-moment 4ICE | 1 km/31 | 12 h | COHMEX, GATE squall line |
| Tao et al. [1995] | 2-D slab symmetric | 3ICE | 0.75 and 1 km/31 | 12 h | EMEX and PRE-STORM |
| Walko et al. [1995]c | 2-D | 4ICE | 0.3 km/80 | 30 min | Idealized |
| Meyers et al. [1997]c,d | 2-D | two-moment 4ICE | 0.5 km/80 | 30 min | Idealized |
| Straka and Mansell [2005]c | 3-D | 10-ICE | 0.5 km/30 | ~2 h | Idealized |
| Lang et al. [2007]d | 3-D | 3ICE | 0.25, 1,1.5 km/41 | 8 h | LBA |
| Zeng [2008]d | 2-D and 3-D | 3ICE | 1 km/41 | 40 days | SCSMEX, KWAJEX |
| Milbrandt and Yau [2005a, 2005b]c | 1-D | three moment | N.A./51 | 50 min | Idealized hail storm |
| Morrison et al. [2005]c | 1-D | two-moment 2ICE | N.A./27 | 3 days | SHEBA |
| Morrison and Grabowski [2008]c | 2-D | two-moment ICE | 50 m/60 | 90 min | FIRE-ACE Idealized |
| Reisner et al. [1998]c | MMS | 3ICE and two-moment ICE | 2.2 km/27 | 6 h | Winter storms |
| Thompson et al. [2004]c | 2-D MMS | 3ICE | 10 km/39 | 3 h | Idealized |
| Thompson et al. [2008]d | 2-D WRF | 3ICE | 10 km/39 | 6 h | Idealized |
| Colle and Mass [2000] | MMS | 3ICE | 1.33 km/38 | 96 h | Orographic flooding |
| Colle and Zeng [2004]f | 2-D MMS | 3ICE | 1.33 km/39 | 12 h | Orographic |
| Colle et al. [2005]f | MMS | 3ICE | 1.33 km/320 | 36 h | IMPROVE |
| Yang and Ching [2005]a | MMS | 3ICE | 6.67 km/23 | 2.5 days | Typhoon Toraji (2001) |
| Zhu and Zhang [2006b]a | MMS | 3ICE | 4 km/24 | 5 days | Hurricane Bonnie (1998) |
| Wang [2002]a | TCM3-hydrostatic | 3ICE | 5 km/21 | 5 days | Idealized |
| Hong et al. [2004]c | 2-D WRF | 3ICE | 250 m/80 | 1 h | Idealized |
| Li and Pu [2008]a | 3-D WRF WRF | 2ICE and 3ICE | 45 km/23 3 km/31 |
48 h 1.25 days |
Korea heavy rain event Hurricane Emily (2005) |
| Jankov et al. [2005, 2007]a | WRF | 2ICE and 3ICE | 12 km/31 | 1 day | IHOP |
| Dudhia et al. [2008]a | WRF | 3ICE | 5 km/31 | 1.5 days | Korean heavy snow event |
| Tao and Moncrieff [2009]; | WRF | 2ICE and 3ICE | 1 km/41 | 1.5 days | IHOP and Hurricane Katrina (2005) |
| Tao et al. [2011a] | 3ICE and 4ICE | 1.667 km/31 | 3 days | ||
| Han et al. [2013]e | WRF | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 1.3 km/52 | 2 days | Northern California winter cyclone |
| Iguchi et al. [2012a, 2012b] | WRF | 3ICE and SBM | 1 km/60 | 36 h | C3VP and MC3E |
| Li et al. [2009a, 2009b]e | 2-D GCE | 3ICE and SBM | 1 km/33 | 12 h | PRE-STORM |
| Del Genio et al. [2012] | WRF | two-moment 3ICE | 600 m/50 | 3 days | TWP-ICE |
| Gilmore et al. [2004]d | SAM | 3ICE | 1 km/40 | 2 h | Idealized |
| Powell et al. [2012]e | WRF | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 3 km/61 | 24 h and 30 h | AMMA |
| Tao et al. [2013]d | WRF | 3ICE | 2 km/41 | 2 days | MC3E |
| Wu et al. [2013]e | WRF | 2ICE and 3ICE | 3 km/41 | 2 days | SGP MCSs |
| Lang et al. [2011]d | 3-D GCE | 3ICE | 250 and 500 m/70 | 6 h and 72 h | TRMM LBA and KWAJEX |
| Morrison and Grabowski [2008]e | 2-D WRF | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 250 m/N.A. | 7 h | Idealized |
| Varble et al. [2014a, 2014b]e | Multiple models | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 917 m and 1 km/50 or 120 | 6 days | TWP-ICE |
| Fridlind et al. [2012]e | Multiple models | one- and two-moment 2ICE/3ICE | 900 m–3 km/N.A. | 6 days | TWP-ICE |
| Van Weverberg et al. [2012a]d | ARPS | 3ICE | 3 km/50 | 30 h | Convective and stratiform cases |
| Van Weverberg et al. [2012b]e | 2-D WRF | two-moment 3ICE and 4ICE | 1 km/40 | 5 h | Idealized |
| Van Weverberg et al. [2013] | WRF | two-moment 3ICE | 1 km/40 | 5 h | Idealized and TWP-ICE |
| Van Weverberg et al. [2013]e | WRF | one- and two-moment 2ICE and 3ICE | 4 km/35 | 7 days | TWP-ICE |
| Bryan and Morrison [2012]e | 3-DCM1 | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 250 m/100 | 9 h | Idealized |
| Morrison and Milbrandt [2011]e | WRF | two-moment 3ICE and 4ICE | 1 km/500 m | 2 h | Idealized |
| Morrison and Grabowski [2007]e | 2-D kinematic | two-moment 3ICE w/bin warm rain | N.A. | N.A. | Idealized |
| Luo et al. [2010]de | WRF | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 3.3 km/30 | 1 day | Mei-Yu front |
| Li et al. [2008] | 3-D University of Utah CRM | 3ICE | 500 m/N.A. | 3 days | KWAJEX MCS |
| Molthan and Colle [2012] | WRF | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 9, 3,1 km/34 | 1 day | C3VP synoptic snow event |
| Guy et al. [2013] | 3-D GCE | 3ICE | 1 km/63 | >10 h | AMMA 2 Sahel MCSs |
| Lang et al. [2014] | 3-D GCE | 3ICE and 4ICE | 200 m and 1 km/70 and 76 | 6 h and 96 h | TRMM LBA and MC3E MCS |
| Saleeby and Cotton [2004]c | 3-D RAMS | one- and two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme and Drizzle mode | 2.0 km/40 | 2 h | Idealized supercell |
| Saleeby et al. [2007]c | 3-D RAMS | two-moment, new ice fall speeds | 3.0 km/35 | 36 h | Winter synoptic case/orographic |
| Saleeby and Cotton [2008]c | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE | 2.0 km/45 | 27 h | Orographic snowfall |
| Saleeby et al. [2010]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 1.25 km/50 | 48 h | Warm and mixed-phase maritime cumulus |
| Saleeby et al. [2009, 2013]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 750 m/45 600 m/45 |
42 h | Orographic snowfall |
| Saleeby and van den Heever [2013]c | 2-D and 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 200 m/50 m 1 km/0.1–1 km 3 km/75–800 m |
1 day 2 h 42 h |
Shallow warm rain Deep convection Orographic snowfall |
| Saleeby et al. [2015]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment, Aerosol scheme | 250 m/40 | 36 h | ATEX |
| Igel et al. [2013]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 3.0 km/45 | 48 h | Synoptic warm front |
| Igel et al. [2015]f | 3-D RAM | one- and two-moment SICE | 70–750 m/65 | 10 days | RCE |
| Grant and van den Heever [2015]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 25–300 m/92 | 3 h | Idealized supercell |
| Grant and van den Heever [2014]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 100 m–1.0 km/57 | 16 h | Idealized sea breeze convection |
| van den Heever and Cotton 2004]e | 3-D RAMS | SICE, specified hail diameter | 1.0 km/35 | 2 h | Idealized supercell |
| van den Heever et al. [2006]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 500 m/36 | 12 h | CRYSTAL-FACE Deep convection |
| van den Heever and Cotton [2007]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 1.5 km/40 | 26 h | St. Louis urban convection |
| van den Heever et al. [2011]f | 2-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 1.0 km/38 | 100 days | Radiative convective equilibrium |
| Herbener et al. [2014]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 2.0 km/56 | 144 h | Idealized TC |
| Seigel et al. [2013]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 500 m/70 | 7 h | Idealized continental squall line |
| Seigel and van den Heever [2013]e | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, varied hail size | 500 m/65 | 7 h | Idealized continental squall line |
| Adams-Selin et al. [2013a]e | WRF | SICE versus 6ICE | 1.0 km/72 | 6 h | Oklahoma bow echo |
| Adams-Selin et al. [2013b]e | WRF | Multiple WRF schemes | 3.0 km/35 | 24 h | Oklahoma bow echo |
| Storer et al. [2010]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 1.0 km/35 | 5.5 h | Idealized supercell |
| Storer and van den Heever [2013]f | 3-D RAMS | two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme | 1.0 km/65 | 100 days | RCE deep convection |
| Zhu et al. [2012]e | Multiple models | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 1–2.8 km/50–92 | 33 h | TWP-ICE |
| Varble et al. [2014a, 2014b]e | Multiple models | one- and two-moment 3ICE | 917 m and 1 km/76–103 | 33 h | TWP-ICE |
Model type (2-D or 3-D), microphysical scheme (one moment or multimoment), horizontal resolution and number of vertical layers, integration time, and case(s) are listed. TCM3 stands for the “Tropical Cyclone Model with triple nested movable mesh.” RCE is radiative-convective equilibrium, SGP the southern Great Plains, ATEX the AMMA the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analyses, TWP-ICE the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment, CRYSTAL-FACE the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers—Florida Area Cirrus Experiment, IMPROVE the Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment, EMEX the Equatorial Monsoon Experiment, SCSMEX the South China Sea Monsoon Experiment, KWAJEX the Kwajalein Experiment, PRE-STORM the Preliminary Regional Experiment for STORM-Central, TOGA-COARE the Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment, GATE the Global Atmospheric Research Program’s Atlantic Tropical Experiment, SHEBA the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean Experiment, COHMEX the Cooperative Huntsville Meteorological Experiment, and FIRE-ACE the FIRE Artic Cloud Experiment.
Comparison with the present study.
Development of a new scheme.
Existing schemes.
Different schemes.
Process (budget) studies.