Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Geophys Res Atmos. 2016 Jan 11;121(3):1278–1305. doi: 10.1002/2015JD023986

Table 1.

Key Papers Using High-Resolution Numerical Cloud Models with Bulk Microphysics Schemes to Study the Impact of Microphysical Schemes on Precipitationaa

Study Model Microphysics Resolution/Vertical Layers Integration Time Case(s)
Lin et al. [1983] 2-D 3ICE 200 m/95 48 min Montana hail event
Cotton et al. [1982,1986] 2-D 3ICE 500 m/31 5h Orographic snow
Rutledge and Hobbs [1984] 2-D kinematic 3ICE 600 m/20 Steady State Narrow cold front
Lord et al. [1984]a 2-D axisymmetric 3ICE versus Warm Rain 2 km/20 4.5 days Idealized
Yoshizaki [1986]c 2-D slab symmetric 3ICE versus Warm Rain 0.5 km/32 4.5 h 12 September GATE squall line
Nicholls [1987] 2-D slab symmetric 3ICE versus Warm Rain 0.5 km/25 5h 12 September GATE squall line
Fovell and Ogura [1988]c,f 2-D slab symmetric 3ICE versus Warm Rain 1 km/31 10 h Midlatitude squall line
Tao and Simpson [1989,1993]c 2-D and 3-D 3ICE versus Warm Rain 1 km/31 12 h GATE squall line
Tao et al. [1993] 2-D 3ICE 1 km/31 12 h GATE squall line
McCumber et al. [1991]d,f 2-D and 3-D 3ICE (graupel versus hail, 1 km/31 12 h GATE squall line
Wu et al. [1999] 2-D slab symmetric 2ICE versus 3ICE) 2ICE 3 km/52 39 days TOGA COARE
Ferrier [1994]; Ferrier et al. [1995]c 2-D slab symmetric two-moment 4ICE 1 km/31 12 h COHMEX, GATE squall line
Tao et al. [1995] 2-D slab symmetric 3ICE 0.75 and 1 km/31 12 h EMEX and PRE-STORM
Walko et al. [1995]c 2-D 4ICE 0.3 km/80 30 min Idealized
Meyers et al. [1997]c,d 2-D two-moment 4ICE 0.5 km/80 30 min Idealized
Straka and Mansell [2005]c 3-D 10-ICE 0.5 km/30 ~2 h Idealized
Lang et al. [2007]d 3-D 3ICE 0.25, 1,1.5 km/41 8 h LBA
Zeng [2008]d 2-D and 3-D 3ICE 1 km/41 40 days SCSMEX, KWAJEX
Milbrandt and Yau [2005a, 2005b]c 1-D three moment N.A./51 50 min Idealized hail storm
Morrison et al. [2005]c 1-D two-moment 2ICE N.A./27 3 days SHEBA
Morrison and Grabowski [2008]c 2-D two-moment ICE 50 m/60 90 min FIRE-ACE
Idealized
Reisner et al. [1998]c MMS 3ICE and two-moment ICE 2.2 km/27 6 h Winter storms
Thompson et al. [2004]c 2-D MMS 3ICE 10 km/39 3 h Idealized
Thompson et al. [2008]d 2-D WRF 3ICE 10 km/39 6 h Idealized
Colle and Mass [2000] MMS 3ICE 1.33 km/38 96 h Orographic flooding
Colle and Zeng [2004]f 2-D MMS 3ICE 1.33 km/39 12 h Orographic
Colle et al. [2005]f MMS 3ICE 1.33 km/320 36 h IMPROVE
Yang and Ching [2005]a MMS 3ICE 6.67 km/23 2.5 days Typhoon Toraji (2001)
Zhu and Zhang [2006b]a MMS 3ICE 4 km/24 5 days Hurricane Bonnie (1998)
Wang [2002]a TCM3-hydrostatic 3ICE 5 km/21 5 days Idealized
Hong et al. [2004]c 2-D WRF 3ICE 250 m/80 1 h Idealized
Li and Pu [2008]a 3-D WRF WRF 2ICE and 3ICE 45 km/23
3 km/31
48 h
1.25 days
Korea heavy rain event Hurricane Emily (2005)
Jankov et al. [2005, 2007]a WRF 2ICE and 3ICE 12 km/31 1 day IHOP
Dudhia et al. [2008]a WRF 3ICE 5 km/31 1.5 days Korean heavy snow event
Tao and Moncrieff [2009]; WRF 2ICE and 3ICE 1 km/41 1.5 days IHOP and Hurricane Katrina (2005)
Tao et al. [2011a] 3ICE and 4ICE 1.667 km/31 3 days
Han et al. [2013]e WRF one- and two-moment 3ICE 1.3 km/52 2 days Northern California winter cyclone
Iguchi et al. [2012a, 2012b] WRF 3ICE and SBM 1 km/60 36 h C3VP and MC3E
Li et al. [2009a, 2009b]e 2-D GCE 3ICE and SBM 1 km/33 12 h PRE-STORM
Del Genio et al. [2012] WRF two-moment 3ICE 600 m/50 3 days TWP-ICE
Gilmore et al. [2004]d SAM 3ICE 1 km/40 2 h Idealized
Powell et al. [2012]e WRF one- and two-moment 3ICE 3 km/61 24 h and 30 h AMMA
Tao et al. [2013]d WRF 3ICE 2 km/41 2 days MC3E
Wu et al. [2013]e WRF 2ICE and 3ICE 3 km/41 2 days SGP MCSs
Lang et al. [2011]d 3-D GCE 3ICE 250 and 500 m/70 6 h and 72 h TRMM LBA and KWAJEX
Morrison and Grabowski [2008]e 2-D WRF one- and two-moment 3ICE 250 m/N.A. 7 h Idealized
Varble et al. [2014a, 2014b]e Multiple models one- and two-moment 3ICE 917 m and 1 km/50 or 120 6 days TWP-ICE
Fridlind et al. [2012]e Multiple models one- and two-moment 2ICE/3ICE 900 m–3 km/N.A. 6 days TWP-ICE
Van Weverberg et al. [2012a]d ARPS 3ICE 3 km/50 30 h Convective and stratiform cases
Van Weverberg et al. [2012b]e 2-D WRF two-moment 3ICE and 4ICE 1 km/40 5 h Idealized
Van Weverberg et al. [2013] WRF two-moment 3ICE 1 km/40 5 h Idealized and TWP-ICE
Van Weverberg et al. [2013]e WRF one- and two-moment 2ICE and 3ICE 4 km/35 7 days TWP-ICE
Bryan and Morrison [2012]e 3-DCM1 one- and two-moment 3ICE 250 m/100 9 h Idealized
Morrison and Milbrandt [2011]e WRF two-moment 3ICE and 4ICE 1 km/500 m 2 h Idealized
Morrison and Grabowski [2007]e 2-D kinematic two-moment 3ICE w/bin warm rain N.A. N.A. Idealized
Luo et al. [2010]de WRF one- and two-moment 3ICE 3.3 km/30 1 day Mei-Yu front
Li et al. [2008] 3-D University of Utah CRM 3ICE 500 m/N.A. 3 days KWAJEX
MCS
Molthan and Colle [2012] WRF one- and two-moment 3ICE 9, 3,1 km/34 1 day C3VP synoptic snow event
Guy et al. [2013] 3-D GCE 3ICE 1 km/63 >10 h AMMA 2 Sahel MCSs
Lang et al. [2014] 3-D GCE 3ICE and 4ICE 200 m and 1 km/70 and 76 6 h and 96 h TRMM LBA and MC3E MCS
Saleeby and Cotton [2004]c 3-D RAMS one- and two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme and Drizzle mode 2.0 km/40 2 h Idealized supercell
Saleeby et al. [2007]c 3-D RAMS two-moment, new ice fall speeds 3.0 km/35 36 h Winter synoptic case/orographic
Saleeby and Cotton [2008]c 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE 2.0 km/45 27 h Orographic snowfall
Saleeby et al. [2010]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 1.25 km/50 48 h Warm and mixed-phase maritime cumulus
Saleeby et al. [2009, 2013]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 750 m/45
600 m/45
42 h Orographic snowfall
Saleeby and van den Heever [2013]c 2-D and 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 200 m/50 m
1 km/0.1–1 km
3 km/75–800 m
1 day
2 h
42 h
Shallow warm rain
Deep convection
Orographic snowfall
Saleeby et al. [2015]f 3-D RAMS two-moment, Aerosol scheme 250 m/40 36 h ATEX
Igel et al. [2013]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 3.0 km/45 48 h Synoptic warm front
Igel et al. [2015]f 3-D RAM one- and two-moment SICE 70–750 m/65 10 days RCE
Grant and van den Heever [2015]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 25–300 m/92 3 h Idealized supercell
Grant and van den Heever [2014]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 100 m–1.0 km/57 16 h Idealized sea breeze convection
van den Heever and Cotton 2004]e 3-D RAMS SICE, specified hail diameter 1.0 km/35 2 h Idealized supercell
van den Heever et al. [2006]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 500 m/36 12 h CRYSTAL-FACE Deep convection
van den Heever and Cotton [2007]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 1.5 km/40 26 h St. Louis urban convection
van den Heever et al. [2011]f 2-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 1.0 km/38 100 days Radiative convective equilibrium
Herbener et al. [2014]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 2.0 km/56 144 h Idealized TC
Seigel et al. [2013]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 500 m/70 7 h Idealized continental squall line
Seigel and van den Heever [2013]e 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, varied hail size 500 m/65 7 h Idealized continental squall line
Adams-Selin et al. [2013a]e WRF SICE versus 6ICE 1.0 km/72 6 h Oklahoma bow echo
Adams-Selin et al. [2013b]e WRF Multiple WRF schemes 3.0 km/35 24 h Oklahoma bow echo
Storer et al. [2010]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 1.0 km/35 5.5 h Idealized supercell
Storer and van den Heever [2013]f 3-D RAMS two-moment SICE, Aerosol scheme 1.0 km/65 100 days RCE deep convection
Zhu et al. [2012]e Multiple models one- and two-moment 3ICE 1–2.8 km/50–92 33 h TWP-ICE
Varble et al. [2014a, 2014b]e Multiple models one- and two-moment 3ICE 917 m and 1 km/76–103 33 h TWP-ICE
a

Model type (2-D or 3-D), microphysical scheme (one moment or multimoment), horizontal resolution and number of vertical layers, integration time, and case(s) are listed. TCM3 stands for the “Tropical Cyclone Model with triple nested movable mesh.” RCE is radiative-convective equilibrium, SGP the southern Great Plains, ATEX the AMMA the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analyses, TWP-ICE the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment, CRYSTAL-FACE the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers—Florida Area Cirrus Experiment, IMPROVE the Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment, EMEX the Equatorial Monsoon Experiment, SCSMEX the South China Sea Monsoon Experiment, KWAJEX the Kwajalein Experiment, PRE-STORM the Preliminary Regional Experiment for STORM-Central, TOGA-COARE the Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment, GATE the Global Atmospheric Research Program’s Atlantic Tropical Experiment, SHEBA the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean Experiment, COHMEX the Cooperative Huntsville Meteorological Experiment, and FIRE-ACE the FIRE Artic Cloud Experiment.

b

Comparison with the present study.

c

Development of a new scheme.

d

Existing schemes.

e

Different schemes.

f

Process (budget) studies.