Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;3:445. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01178-8

Table 1.

Melting temperature (Tm) and basal activity of PLCε variants.

PLCε variant Tm ± SD (˚C) Significance n Specific activity ± S.D. (nmol IP3/min/ nmol PLCε variant) Significance n
PH-COOHa 51.9 ± 0.9 5 360 ± 120 9
PH-COOH Δ RA1 47.6 ± 1.0 **** 3 16 ± 4 **** 5
PH-RA1 50.8 ± 0.3 4 200 ± 50 * 9
PH-C2a 48.3 ± 1.0 **** 4 78 ± 20 *** 5
EF3-RA1 52.7 ± 0.4 4 230 ± 30 3
 1526–1546 51.0 ± 0.2 3 590 ± 40 ** 4
 1621–1634 50.8 ± 0.3 3 290 ± 130 3
 N1316E 48.8 ± 0.4 **** 4 240 ± 120 3
 D1911A 49.7 ± 0.4 **** 4 630 ± 120 *** 4
 R1965A 50.3 ± 0.6 ** 3 640 ± 60 * 2
 F1982A 50.2 ± 0.3 *** 4 390 ± 40 3
 F1982E 50.2 ± 0.4 ** 3 990 ± 300 **** 3
 F2006A 48.9 ± 0.3 **** 3 330 ± 100 3
 F2006E 46.6 ± 0.7 **** 4 320 ± 50 3
 F2077A 50.4 ± 0.4 ** 4 400 ± 120 3
 R2085A 49.4 ± 0.2 **** 3 410 ± 70 3

aData previously reported22.

Results are based on one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test vs. PLCε PH-COOH. (****p ≤ 0.0001,***p ≤ 0.0005, **p ≤ 0.001, *p ≤ 0.05).