Table 4. Summary of coding analysis of engagement forum comments.
| Code | # of Comments | Total # of Comments | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information gathering | |||
| UWI-1 | 23 | ||
| UWI-2 | 28 | ||
| Tamana | 9 | 154 | 31% |
| Curepe | 54 | ||
| St. Augustine | 40 | ||
| Positive | |||
| UWI-1 | 162 | ||
| UWI-2 | 15 | ||
| Tamana | 7 | 238 | 48% |
| Curepe | 29 | ||
| St. Augustine | 25 | ||
| Neutral | |||
| UWI-1 | 1 | ||
| UWI-2 | 0 | ||
| Tamana | 0 | 7 | 1% |
| Curepe | 1 | ||
| St. Augustine | 5 | ||
| Negative | |||
| UWI-1 | 0 | ||
| UWI-2 | 0 | ||
| Tamana | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Curepe | 0 | ||
| St. Augustine | 0 | ||
| Recommendations | |||
| UWI-1 | 3 | ||
| UWI-2 | 17 | ||
| Tamana | 19 | 99 | 20% |
| Curepe | 17 | ||
| St. Augustine | 43 | ||
| TOTAL | 498 | 499 | 100% |
The numbers of comments corresponding to the five codes (Information Gathering, Positive, Neutral, Negative, Recommendations) at each session (UWI-1, UWI-2, Tamana, Curepe, and St. Augustine) are indicated. See text for details.