Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0236362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236362

Table 2. Drug resistance patterns of isolates to first- and second-line anti-TB drugs with TB patient category of study participants in the Tigray Region, northern Ethiopia, July 2018 to August 2019.

First-line resistance pattern New cases (n = 172), F (%) Previously treated cases (n = 55), F (%) Total cases (n = 227), F (%)
Any-S 152 (88.4) 37 (67.3) 189 (83.3)
RIF-R 21 (12.2) 19 (34.5) 40 (17.6)
RIF mono- R 1 (0.6) 1 (1.8) 2 (0.9)
RIF-S 151 (87.8) 36 (65.5) 187 (82.4)
INH-R 23 (13.4) 18 (32.7) 41 (18.1)
INH mono-R 3 (1.7) 0 (0) 3 (1.3)
INH-S 149 (86.6) 37 (67.3) 186 (81.9)
Any-R 24 (14) 19 (34.5) 43 (18.9)
MDR 20 (11.6) 18 (32.7) 38 (16.7)
Second-line resistance pattern (38) New cases (20), F (%) Previously treated cases (18), F (%) Total cases (38), F (%)
FLQ R 0 2 (11.1) 2 (5.3)
S 20 (100) 16 (88.9) 36 (94.7)
AMK, CAP, KAN R 0 0 0
S 20 (100) 18 (100) 38 (100)
KAN, CAP, VIO R 0 0 0
S 20 (100) 18 (100) 38 (100)
KAN, AMK, CAP, VIO R 0 0 0
S 20 (100) 18 (100) 38 (100)
Low-level KAN R 0 0 0
S 20 (100) 18 (100) 38 (100)

R = resistant, S = susceptible, FLQ = Fluoroquinolones (Ofloxacin, levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin), AMK = Amikacin, KAN = kanamycin, CAP = Capromycin, VIO = Viomycin.