Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;71(4):933–943. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz889

Table 3.

Microfiladermia: Intention to Treat

IVM annual IVM semiannual IVM + ALB annual IVM + ALB semiannual P Value
Baseline n 68 68 70 66
MF positive n (%) 68 (100%) 68 (100%) 70 (100%) 66 (100%)
MF/mg skin


Median 4.5 3.3 5.2 3.6
95% CI of the mediana (2.9–7.6) (1.4–5.7) (2.9–8.1) (1.7–6.2)
Geometric meanb 5.2 4.5 5.7 5.5
Min–Max 0.2–69.5 0.1–113 0.1–367 0.1–159
25th; 75th percentiles 1.2; 14.1 0.8; 15.2 0.9; 14.8 0.9; 10.8 .77c
6 months n 63 66 67 63
MF positive n (%) [95%CI]d 26 (41.3%) [30–53.6] 26 (39.4%) [28.5–51.5] 30 (44.8%) [33.5–56.6] 18 (28.6%) [18.9–40.7] .262e
MF/mg skin


Median 0 0 0 0
95% CI of the mediana (0–.25) (0–.13) (0–.29) (0–0)
Geometric meanb 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.19
Min–Max 0–4.2 0–4.6 0–13.9 0–3.3
25th; 75th percentiles 0; 0.3 0; 0.3 0; 0.6 0; 0.2 .268c
P Value (comparison to baseline)f P < .001 P < .001 P < .001 P < .001
18 months n 62 63 64 61
MF positive n (%) [95%CI]d 15 (24.2%) [15.2–36.2] 4 (6.3%) [2.5–15.2] 12 (18.8%) [11.1–30] 8 (13.1%) [6.8–23.8] .035 e
MF/mg skin


Median 0 0 0 0
95% CI of the mediana (0–0) (0–0) (0–0) (0–0)
Geometric meanb 0.09 0.02 0.11 0.06
Min–Max 0–3.7 0–0.7 0–4.2 0–1.6
25th; 75th percentiles 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 .051c
P Value (comparison to baseline)f P < .001 P < .001 P < .001 P < .001
36 months n 56 59 64 53
MF positive n (%) [95%CI]d 21 (37.5%) [26–50.6] 17 (28.8%) [18.8–41.4] 25 (39.1%) [28.1–51.3] 10 (18.9%) [10.6–31.4] .075e
MF/mg skin

Median 0 0 0 0
95% CI of the mediana (0–0.05) (0–0) (0–0.05) (0–0)
Geometric meanb 0.2 0.15 0.23 0.16
Min–Max 0–6.3 0–5.6 0–11.1 0–6.1
25th; 75th percentiles 0; 0.3 0; 0.1 0; 0.2 0; 0 .139c
P Value (comparison to baseline)f P < .001 P < .001 P < .001 P < .001

These P-values are written in bold to show the significant values below .05.

Abbreviations: ALB, albendazole; CI, confidence interval; IVM, ivermectin; MF, microfilaria.

aCIs for the median were calculated using bootstrapping.

bThe geometric mean was calculated by adding 1 to the original MF values and subtracting 1 from the final result.

cKruskal-Wallis test.

dCIs for proportions were calculated using the method recommended by Altman et al [30].

eFisher’s exact test.

fWilcoxon signed-rank test.