Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 18;9(8):e015846. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015846

Figure 3. Comparison of patient‐oriented composite outcome between preserved or depressed resistive reserve ratio, among high fractional flow reserve or high coronary flow reserve population with deferred revascularization.

Figure 3

The cumulative incidence of patient‐oriented composite outcome at 5 years is compared between preserved (≥3.5) and depressed resistive reserve ratio (<3.5) in subgroup of (A) high fractional flow reserve (>0.80) or (B) high coronary flow reserve (>2.0) among patients with deferred revascularization. CFR indicates coronary flow reserve; FFR, fractional flow reserve; HR, hazard ratio; and RRR, resistive reserve ratio.