Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 18;9(8):e015473. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015473

Table 5.

Summary of Demographic, Baseline Clinical and Outcome Data for Major Published HCM Studies Comparing Genotype‐Positive and Genotype‐Negative Patients

Center SHaRe Registry Mayo Clinic, USA UCL, UK Toronto General Hospital, Canada Erasmus Medical Centre, Netherlands Centenary Institute, Australia Meta‐Analysis (13 Cohorts)
Study Ho et al102 Bos et al120 Lopes et al121 Li et al118 van Velzen et al125 Ingles et al126 Lopes et al124
Cohort size 4591 1053 874 558 512 265 2459
Genes tested 8 9 8 8 Large panel 10 ···
Genotype positive, % 46.3% 34.1% 43.8% 35.5% 45.7% 52.1% ···
Demographics
Age at inclusion 45.8±14.7 vs 53.1±14.9 46±15 vs 55±15 47±16 vs 56±17
P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001
Age at diagnosis 37.3±17.1 vs 49.0±17.4 36.4±17 vs 48.5±18 39.5±15.2 vs 48.5±14.8 34±17 vs 44±18 38.4±10.3 vs 46.0±10.4
P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001
Sex (% male) 60.6% vs 66.0% 58.5% vs 60.4% 56.1% vs 70.3% 67.9% vs 61.5% 53.6% vs 70.9% 57.5% vs 61.5%
P<0.01 P=0.6 P=0.001 P=0.13 P=0.005 P=0.422
FH HCM (%) 57.9% vs 24.5% 50.4% vs 22.9% 39.8% vs 15.6% 52.5% vs 20.0% 73.9% vs 30.7% 50.6% vs 23.1%
P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001
FH SCD (%) 27.0% vs 15.0% 28.5% vs 15.2% 16.7% vs 7.2% 19.7% vs 5.4% 41.3% vs 6.3% 27.0% vs 14.9%
P<0.001 P<0.001 P=0.002 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001
Baseline characteristics
Max LVWT, mm 19.7±6.2 vs 18.1±5.2 22.6±6 vs 20.1±5 18.8±4.4 vs 18.1±4.1 20.8±4.8 vs 19.6±4.9 20±5 vs 18±4 22±6 vs 21±5 21.0±4.1 vs 19.3±3.5
P<0.001 P<0.001 P=0.004 P=0.16 (adjusted) P<0.001 P=0.03 P=0.03
Hypertension (%) 19.2% vs 43.2% 25.3% vs 46.9% 22.8% vs 41.7%
P<0.001 P<0.001 P=0.004
Clinical outcomes—hazard ratio (CI/log rank P value)
Mean follow‐up years 5.4±6.9 6.6±6.3/6.2±5.6 12±9
CV mortality 2.41 (1.73–3.35) (all death) 3.99 (P=0.001) 2.82 (P=0.002)
HF‐related mortality 6.33 (P=0.004)
SCD/aborted SCD 3.44 (P=0.028) 2.88 (P=0.015)
Combined HF events 1.87 (1.55–2.25) 4.51 (P<0.001)
Overall composite 1.98 (1.72–2.28)

Genotype‐positive status is defined by the presence of a putatively pathogenic variant—the vast majority of these occur in one of the 8 core sarcomeric genes (MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNT2, TNNI3, TPM1, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1). The meta‐analysis by Lopes et al124 involved 13 previously published cohorts—this included subsets of the cohorts from the Mayo Clinic and Toronto General Hospital that had been published prior to the larger versions of those cohorts described here. The SHaRe registry may include cases from the Erasmus Medical Centre study and the meta‐analysis by Lopes et al124. CI indicates confidence interval; FH, family history; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HF, heart failure; LVWT, left‐ventricular wall thickness; SCD, sudden cardiac death; and UCL, University College London.