Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;9(7):e014919. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014919

Table 4.

Comparison of Indexed Volume for Coronary Plaque Subtypes and CAC Score Stratified by the Exercise Intensity Groups

No Exercise (n=75) Moderate Intensity (n=89) High Intensity (n=106) ANOVA P Value P Value No Exercise vs High Intensity
Plaque subtypesa
Fatty plaque 9.6 [5.5, 14.1] 8.0 [4.3, 13.1] 9.6 [5.6, 14.2] 0.42 0.88
Fibrous plaque 16.0 [9.4, 23.9] 15.0 [8.9, 22.4] 17.6 [17.6, 25.2] 0.29 0.59
Noncalcified plaque 25.3 [15.0, 37.2] 22.4 [15.0, 35.3] 27.4 [15.0, 47.5] 0.36 0.69
Total plaque 30.2 [18.1, 43.8] 27.3 [15.8, 41.8] 33.3 [18.6, 46.2] 0.32 0.75
CACb 356.9 [83.6, 978.0] 455.2 [170.2, 984.6] 516.6 [142.0, 1350.6] 0.28 0.46

Data presented as median [interquartile range]. CAC indicates coronary artery calcium score.

a

Plaque volume expressed as mm3 divided by artery segment length (mm).

b

CAC score using Agatston technique and expressed in Agatston units.