Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;12(7):741–755. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i7.741

Table 3.

Correlation between clinicopathological factors and p53 expression

Clinicopathological parameter Number (n = 266) aP53 nuclear expression (n = 266)
aP value bTP53 gene status (n = 266)
bP value
negative (n = 40) 10%-50%(n = 69) > 50% (n = 157) Wild type(n = 176) Mutated (n = 90)
Age (yr) ≤ 60 96 15 28 53 > 0.05 70 26 > 0.05
> 60 170 25 41 104 106 64
Localization Proximal/middle 155 22 34 99 > 0.05 95 60 0.05
Distal and antrum 95 15 33 47 72 23
Diffuse localization 16 3 3 10 9 7
Microscopy G1+2 75 9 20 46 > 0.05 43 32 > 0.05
G3 76 14 23 39 51 25
Papillary 10 1 2 7 5 5
Poorly cohesive 53 5 14 34 35 18
Signet ring cell 25 8 2 15 19 6
Micro-glandular 27 3 8 16 23 4
Budding degree (Dyscohesivity) Nodular 34 4 8 22 > 0.05 17 17 0.05
≤ 5 buds/HPF 17 2 7 8 9 8
5-9 buds/HPF 50 5 19 26 30 20
≥ 10 buds/HPF 60 11 13 36 42 18
Diffuse 105 18 22 65 78 27
pT stage pT1,2 37 6 7 24 > 0.05 24 13 > 0.05
pT3,4 229 34 62 133 152 77
pN stage pN0 53 11 13 29 > 0.05 32 21 > 0.05
pN1-3 213 29 56 128 144 69
Dukes-MAC-like stage 1 + 3 - T1,2N0 17 2 3 12 > 0.05 12 5 > 0.05
2 + 4 - T1,2N1-3 20 3 3 14 11 9
5 + 7 – T3,4N0 36 7 10 19 20 16
6 + 8 – T3,4N1-3 193 28 53 112 133 60

G1: Well differentiated, G2: Moderately differentiated, G3: Poorly differentiated; pT: Depth of tumor infiltration; pN: Lymph node status.