Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;28(8):2458–2467. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06133-y

Table 4.

Demographic data of patients with revision ACLR (n = 111), n.s. = not significant, STD standard deviation

Characteristics In total (n = 111) Failed revision ACLR (n = 16) Stable revision ACLR (n = 95) p value
Female Sex, n (%) 43 (38.7) 6 (37.5) 37 (38.9) n.s
Patient age, mean ± STD 31.7 ± 11 (15–58) 31.8 ± 10 (20–52) 31.7 ± 11.2 (15–58)
Affected knee, left, n (%) 50 (45) 5 (31.3) 45 (47.4) n.s
Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, n (%) 30 (27) 12 (75) 18 (18.9) p < 0.001
Two-stage revision ACLR with bone tunnel filling, n (%) 49 (44.1) 5 (31.3) 44 (46.3) n.s
High-grade anterior knee laxity, n (%) 41 (36.9) 11 (68.8) 30 (31.6) p = 0.004
Number of previous ACLR procedures, n (%)
1 previous ACLR procedure 94 (85.5) 12 (75) 82 (87.2) n.s
2 previous ACLR procedures 13 (11.8) 4 (25) 9 (9.6)
3 previous ACLR procedures 1 (0.9) 0 1 (1.1)
4 previous ACLR procedures 2 (1.8) 0 2 (2.1)
Time between revision ACLR and previous ACLR in months, mean ± SD 47.5 ± 37.6 (12–181) 45.3 ± 44.3 (12–178) 47.9 ± 36.6 (14–181) n.s
Traumatic reinjury after revision ACLR n (%) 1 (0.9) 1 (6.3) 0