Table 7.
Revision ACLR graft choice and additional procedures during revision ACLR (n = 111), n.s. = not significant, BTPB = bone–tendon–patellar–bone, HTO = high tibial osteotomy
| Characteristics | In total (n = 111) | Failed revision ACLR (n = 16) | Stable revision ACLR (n = 95) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choice of revision ACLR graft, n (%) | ||||
| BTPB graft | 64 (57.7) | 12 (75) | 52 (54.7) | n.s |
| Ipsilateral hamstring graft | 20 (18) | 2 (12.5) | 18 (18.9) | |
| Contralateral hamstring graft | 12 (10.8) | 1 (6.3) | 11 (11.6) | |
| Quadriceps graft | 15 (13.5) | 1 (6.3) | 14 (14.7) | |
| Medial stabilized operatively in total, n (%) | 25 (22.5) | 5 (31.3) | 20 (21,1) | n.s |
| Houghston, n (%) | 22 (19.8) | 4 (25) | 18 (18.9) | n.s |
| MCL graft reconstruction, n (%) | 3 (2.7) | 1 (6.3) | 2 (2.1) | n.s |
| Extra-articular lateral tenodesis, n (%) | 51 (45.9) | 8 (50) | 43 (45.3) | n.s |
| Valgus-open HTO | 7 (6.3) | 1 (6.3) | 6 (6.3) | n.s |
| Slope reduction osteotomy | 5 (4.5) | 0 | 5 (5.3) | n.s |