Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;11(8):1627–1633. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00300

Table 2. Characterization by MALDI-TOF, PDB Codes, BMRD ID, and Electrophysiology Effect of Current Inhibition of R-tam and Mutantsa.

r-tam mutant Oxidized form, Theoretical Mass Experimental Mass PDB ID Code BMRB ID Case Effect of SK2 current inhibition Effect of SK3 current inhibition
r-tam 3459.1 3459.0 2LU9 18513   ⧫⧫⧫ ⧫⧫
ΔP30 3362.0 3361.8 6D3T 30454 1 ⧫⧫
ΔP30/In32N 3476.1 3476.1 6D8Q 30460 1 ⧫⧫
Y31H 3433.1 3433.4 6D8Y 30465 1 ⧫⧫
In32N 3573.2 3573.1 6D8H 30459 1 ⧫⧫
K20E 3460.1 3460.2 6D8U 30464 2 ⧫⧫⧫
E25K 3458.2 3457.9 6D8R 30461 2 ⧫⧫
K27E 3460.1 3460.0 6D8S 30462 2 ⧫⧫
E25K/K27E 3459.1 3458.9 6D8T 30463 2 ⧫⧫ ⧫⧫⧫
K20A 3402.0 3402.1 6VNZ 30719 3 ⧫⧫⧫
E25A 3401.1 3401.0 6D9O 30467 3 ⧫⧫
K27A 3402.0 3402.3 6D9P 30468 3 ⧫⧫
Y31A 3367.0 3367.0 6D93 30466 3 ⧫⧫
a

We also include the case described to include the mutant in our study. We evaluated all mutants base on high (⧫⧫⧫, > 85%), medium (⧫⧫, 84–40), low (⧫, < 39%), or absence activity (−) under electrophysiology activity on SK2 and SK3 channels.