Skip to main content
. 2020 May;253:112971. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112971

Table 1.

Reading for pleasure (age 7) and SDQ (age 11).

Frequency of reading for pleasure Strengths and difficulties
Matched on mother's data only
Matched on both mother's and father's data
ATT (95% CI) p ATT (95% CI) p
Most days vs. any other frequency Hyperactivity/Inattention −0.05 (−0.09, −0.02) <0.001 −0.06 (−0.10, −0.02) 0.005
Prosocial behaviour 0.04 (0.01, 0.08) 0.020 0.05 (0.01, 0.09) 0.023
Emotional problems 0.01 (−0.03, 0.04) 0.721 0.00 (−0.04, 0.05) 0.952
Peer problems 0.03 (−0.00, 0.07) 0.059 0.04 (−0.00, 0.08) 0.078
Conduct problems −0.00 (−0.04, 0.03) 0.824 −0.01 (−0.05, 0.03) 0.566
Mean bias 0.7 0.8
Rubin's B 4.0 4.8
Rubin's R 1.06 1.06
N 8936 7016
Most days vs. never/less often than once a year Hyperactivity/Inattention −0.20 (−0.29, −0.12) <0.001 −0.21 (−0.32, −0.11) <0.001
Prosocial behaviour 0.09 (0.01, 0.17) 0.035 0.12 (0.03, 0.20) 0.010
Emotional problems −0.11 (−0.21, −0.02) 0.021 −0.13 (−0.25, −0.00) 0.043
Peer problems −0.06 (−0.18, 0.05) 0.283 −0.08 (−0.20, 0.04) 0.215
Conduct problems −0.02 (−0.10, 0.05) 0.541 −0.04 (−0.13, 0.05) 0.349
Mean bias 3.8 4.0
Rubin's B 25.7 25.4
Rubin's R 1.12 1.30
N 4479 3564

Note. Columns present ATT estimates from PSM models using Epanechnikov kernel matching with 0.05 bandwidths; common support condition is imposed. The models controlled all covariates. ATT Ninety-five percent confidence intervals in parentheses were computed by bootstrapping with 100 replications. Success of the propensity score matching was assessed using a percentage bias of <10% for each covariate, Rubin's B <25% and Rubin's R of 0.5–2. Models controlled for children's gender and ethnicity; parents' marital status, educational levels, and employment status; mental health condition of parents; the levels of closeness between parents and children; parent-child reading engagement frequency; and children's strengths and difficulties indexes at baseline.