Table 1.
Taxonomy | Macroscopy | Trichology | DNA sequencing | Pearson’s correlation coeficiente (ρ) | Total fecal samples (n = 244) |
Order Carnivora | 168 (68.8%) | ||||
Family Canidae | 112 (45.9%) | ||||
Chrysocyon brachyurus | 97 (39.7%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | C. brachyurus | C. brachyurus | c | 42 | |
Order Carnivora | Family Mustelidae | C. brachyurus | 0.95 | 11 | |
Order Carnivora | Family Mephitidae | C. brachyurus | 0.95 | 2 | |
Order Carnivora | C. brachyurus | Low quality gene sequence | 0.97 | 6 | |
Order Carnivora | Family Canidae | C. brachyurus | c | 1 | |
Order Carnivora | Absent guard hair | C. brachyurus | 0.95 | 24 | |
Family Canidae | C. brachyurus | C. brachyurus | c | 3 | |
Family Felidae | C. brachyurus | C. brachyurus | 0.99 | 7 | |
Family Felidae | Family Canidae | C. brachyurus | – | 1 | |
Canis familiaris | 13 (5.3%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | Family Canidae | C. familiaris | c | 8 | |
Order Carnivora | Procyon cancrivorus | C. familiaris | – | 1 | |
Order Carnivora | Family Mephitidae | C. familiaris | – | 1 | |
Order Carnivora | Absent guard hair | C. familiaris | – | 2 | |
Family Canidae | Family Canidae | C. familiaris | c | 1 | |
Cerdocyon thous | 2 (0.8%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | C. thous | C. thous | c | 1 | |
Order Carnivora | Absent guard hair | C. thous | – | 1 | |
Family Felidae | 56 (22.9%) | ||||
Leopardus guttulus | 52 (21.3%) | ||||
Family Felidae | L. guttulus | L. guttulus | c | 3 | |
Family Felidae | L. guttulus | Low quality gene sequence | 0.97 | 1 | |
Family Felidae | Absent guard hair | L. guttulus | 0.94 | 24 | |
Family Felidae | Family Canidae | L. guttulus | 0.94 | 6 | |
Family Felidae | Procyon cancrivorus | L. guttulus | 0.94 | 2 | |
Family Felidae | Family Mustelidae | L. guttulus | 0.94 | 2 | |
Family Felidae | Family Mephitidae | L. guttulus | 0.94 | 5 | |
Order Carnivora | Absent guard hair | L. guttulus | – | 7 | |
Order Carnivora | L. pardalis | L. guttulus | – | 1 | |
Order Carnivora | P. yagouaroundi | L. guttulus | – | 1 | |
Puma yagouaroundi | 2 (0.8%) | ||||
Family Felidae | P. yagouaroundi | Low quality gene sequence | 0.68 | 2 | |
Leopardus pardalis | 1 (0.4%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | L. pardalis | Low quality gene sequence | – | 1 | |
Puma concolor | 1 (0.4%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | Família Mustelidae | P. concolor | – | 1 | |
Order Artiodactyla | 31 (12.7%) | ||||
Family Suidae | 12 (4.9%) | ||||
Sus scrofa | 12 (4.9%) | ||||
Order Artiodactyla | Absent guard hair | S. scrofa | – | 1 | |
Order Artiodactyla | Order Artiodactyla | S. scrofa | c | 11 | |
Taxonomy | Macroscopy | Trichology | DNA sequencing | Total fecal samples (n = 244) | |
Order Carnivora | 168 (68.8%) | ||||
Order Carnivora USa | 45 (18.4%) | ||||
Order Carnivora | L. guttulus | C. familiaris | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | L. pardalis | C. brachyurus | 2 | ||
Order Carnivora | P. yagouaroundi | C. brachyurus | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | Absent guard hair | Low quality gene sequence | 9 | ||
Order Carnivora | Family Mephitidae | Low quality gene sequence | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | C. brachyurus | L. guttulus | 5 | ||
Order Carnivora | Leopardus wiedii | C. thous | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | Nasua nasua | Low quality gene sequence | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | Family Mustelidae | Low quality gene sequence | 1 | ||
Order Carnivora | Family Canidae | Low quality gene sequence | 4 | ||
Family Felidae | C. brachyurus | L. guttulus | 1 | ||
Family Felidae | Family Canidae | Low quality gene sequence | 3 | ||
Family Felidae | Nasua nasua | Low quality gene sequence | 1 | ||
Family Felidae | Family Mustelidae | Low quality gene sequence | 3 | ||
Family Felidae | Absent guard hair | Low quality gene sequence | 6 | ||
Family Felidae | Family Mephitidae | Low quality gene sequence | 4 | ||
Family Felidae | C. brachyurus | Low quality gene sequence | 1 | ||
Order Artiodactyla | 31 (12.7%) | ||||
Order Artiodactyla USb | 19 (7.8%) | ||||
Order Artiodactyla | Absent guard hair | Low quality gene sequence | 6 | ||
Order Artiodactyla | Order Artiodactyla | Low quality gene sequence | 13 |
a Order Carnivora Unidentified Species; b Order Artiodactyla Unidentified Species. c Total agreement among the three identification techniques