Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;222(6):948–956. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa099

Table 1.

Herd Effect (With 95% Confidence Interval) Against Genital Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Type-Specific HPV Prevalence (%) by HPV Vaccination Strategya in Non-HPV-Vaccinated 18.5-Year-Old Females by Trial Arm and Birth Cohort

Arm A (Gender-Neutral) Arm B (Girls-Only) Arm C (Control)
HPV Type Birth Cohorts Prevalence (95%CI) HEc (95% CI) Prevalence (95% CI) HEc (95% CI) Prevalencef (95% CI)
HPV16 1992–1995 7.5 (5.8–9.6) 14.9 (−13.2 to 36.0) 7.6 (6.0–9.6) −1.3 (−29.4 to 20.7) 8.3 (7.4–9.2)
1995 9.5 (5.8–15.1) −19.9 (−92.9 to 25.5) 8.7 (5.6–13.3) 19.2 (−81.8 to 21.9) 8.1 (6.4–10.2)
HPV18 1992–1995 5.0 (3.7–6.9) −16.3 (−60.8 to 15.9) 3.9 (2.8–5.4) 15.1 (−19.8 to 39.8) 5.0 (4.3–5.8)
1995 1.9 (0.6–5.4) 58.3 (−13.5 to 84.7) 2.9 (1.3–6.2) 27.0 (−45.8 to 63.5) 2.7 (1.8–4.1)
HPV31 1992–1995 3.5 (2.4–5.1) 6.6 (−40.5 to 37.9) 3.8 (2.7–5.2) −5.9 (−51.8 to 26.2) 3.8 (3.2–4.5)
1995 0.6 (0.1–3.5) 83.9 (21.2–96.7)e 2.9 (1.3–6.2) 34.9 (−49.0 to 71.5) 3.4 (2.3–4.9)
HPV33 1992–1995 2.9 (1.9–4.3) −41.4 (−125 to 11.2) 3.0 (2.0–4.3) −86.2 (−176 to −25.5)e 2.1 (1.7–2.7)
1995 1.3 (0.3–4.5) 64.9 (−57.5 to 92.2) 1.4 (0.5–4.2) 24.8 (−108 to 72.8) 1.4 (0.8–2.5)
HPV35 1992–1995 1.1 (0.6–2.1) 46.1 (−17.6 to 75.3) 1.1 (0.6–2.1) 50.7 (−4.5 to 76.7) 1.6 (1.3–2.1)
1995 1.3 (0.3–4.5) 3.4 (−203 to 69.2) 1.4 (0.5–4.2) 4.2 (−168 to 65.8) 2.1 (1.3–3.3)
HPV45 1992–1995 3.0 (2.0–4.5) −36.2 (−110 to 11.8) 2.2 (1.4–3.3) −4.5 (−63.9 to 33.4) 2.5 (2.0–3.1)
1995 2.5 (1.0–6.3) −14.5d (−178 to 52.7) 1.0 (0.3–3.5) 52.1d (−49.8 to 84.7) 2.1 (1.3–3.4)
HPV18/31/33 1992–1995 10.1 (8.1–12.5) −39.6 (−71.9 to −13.4)e 9.5 (7.8–11.7) −6.4 (−32.4 to 14.4) 9.8 (8.9–10.9)
1995 3.8 (1.8–8.0)b 59.1 (14.3–80.5)e 6.8 (4.1–11.0) 23.9 (−23.2 to 53.0) 6.7 (5.2–8.7)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, HE, herd effect.

aArm A, gender-neutral (49% girls, 23% boys HPV-vaccinated); Arm B, girls-only (47% girls HPV-vaccinated); Arm C, hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination.

bSignificantly different.

cGeneralized estimating equation (GEE) estimates adjusted for Chlamydia trachomatis/mobility/smoking/vaccination coverage, balanced for equal proportions of HBV vaccinated and nonvaccinated. Herd effect (1-ratio of risks, GEE model, HBV-vaccinated/unvaccinated-ratio balanced between arms using mean GEE estimates from 21 balanced materials).

dNot adjusted for mobility.

eSignificant.

fThe prevalence in Arm C is mean of prevalence estimates from 21 balanced materials. For the estimation of pertinent 95% CI, a material with the mean prevalence and actual size of Arm C was used.