Table 2. Comparison of excision margin in different studies .
Study | Total number of cases | Excision margin | Number of skin lesions | Complete excision | Incomplete excision | Recurrence |
Ito et al. [11] | 288 | 2mm | 46 | 44 | 2 | 0 |
3mm | 172 | 172 | 0 | |||
4mm | 17 | 17 | 0 | |||
5mm | 53 | 53 | 0 | |||
Unverdi et al. [12] | 99 | 3mm | 53 | 50 | 3 | - |
5 mm | 46 | 46 | 0 | |||
Lin et al. [13] | 143 | 3mm | 143 | 120 | 23 | 11 |
Thomas et al. [14] | 92 | 4mm | 92 | 87 | 5 | - |
Sood et al. [15] | 63 | 2 mm | 63 | 60 | 3 | 0 |
Konopnicki et al. [16] | 127 | 3 mm | 32 | 28 | 4 | - |
4mm | 45 | 35 | 10 | |||
5mm | 50 | 42 | 8 | |||
Chada et al. [17] | 90 | 2mm | 90 | 78 | 12 | 3 |
Hsuan et al. [18] | 55 | 2mm | 55 | 45 | 10 | 0 |
Santiago et al. [19] | 306 | 2mm | 226 | 206 | 20 | - |
3mm | 63 | 54 | 9 | |||
4mm | 14 | 11 | 3 | |||
5mm | 3 | 3 | 0 | |||
Nazhad et al. [20] | 50 | 4mm | 50 | 48 | 2 | - |
Nemet et al. [21] | 417 | 3mm | 417 | 311 | 106 | 27 |
Wolf et al. [22] | 117 | 4mm | 117 | 111 | 6 | - |
Griffith et al. [23] | 1392 | 3mm | 1392 | 1293 | 99 | 40 |
Blomqvist et al. [24] | 477 | 3mm | 477 | 457 | 20 | 11 |
Kimyai-Asadi et al. [25] | 134 | 1mm | 25 | 19 | 4 | - |
2mm | 85 | 65 | 20 | |||
3-mm | 24 | 21 | 3 |