Table 2.
No | Description |
1 | Authors and year of publication |
2 | Country of origin of the study |
3 | Type of study |
4 | Study population |
5 | Study completion rate |
6 | Diagnosis |
7 | Surgical approach: medial parapatellar; modified medial parapatellar according to Insall; subvastus; midvastus; trivector retaining; lateral; lateral with tuberositas osteotomy28 |
8 | Study population demographics |
9 | Preoperative and postoperative frontal and sagittal plane knee alignment |
10 | Measurement methods |
10a | Isometric/isokinetic strength measurement |
10b | Angle of isometric measurement/velocity of isokinetic measurement |
10 c | Patient position during the measurement (lying supine/side-lying/standing) |
11 | Comparators: healthy individuals; asymptomatic contralateral side; no comparator |
12 | Total duration of follow-up (weeks/months after the operation) |
13 | Measurement stages (preoperative, follow-up in weeks/months after the operation) |
14 | Information regarding the rehabilitation protocols |
15 | Outcome (mean values, standard deviations (SDs) and confidence intervals (CIs)) |
15a | Absolute values of hip abductor torque in patients after TKA/UKA, or in asymptomatic control groups |
15b | Torque ratio (operated side/contralateral hip) of hip abductors in patients after TKA/UKA |
15 c | Change in hip abductor torque / hip abductor torque ratio from baseline to each follow-up |
15d | Differences in hip abductor torque / torque ratios between patientsafter TKA/UKA and healthy control groups. |
16 | Authors conclusions |
17 | Information regarding risk of bias |
TKA/UKA, total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.